2/ The post is doing excellent traffic, getting tons of reads, and I'm getting many new sign-ups for my Substack, Original Jurisdiction.
After 8 hours or so, the post has gotten more than 10,000 views—which, for Original Jurisdiction, is huge.
3/ But here's what I find most interesting: the post is getting little traction on social media, especially Twitter. Very few links, mentions, retweets, etc.
4/ What does this gap between high private engagement with my story but low public engagement reflect?
Scared of being attacked, declared A Bad Person, or yes, canceled.
5/ My post is about cancel culture and the serious threats faced by free speech and intellectual diversity, at Yale Law and in higher education more generally.
Many have messaged me privately to express support and agreement.
Few have done so publicly.
6/ Why? Because to express concern publicly over cancel culture is to put yourself at risk of cancellation.
7/ I can hardly fault folks for inveighing against cancel culture privately—in emails or DMs or group texts, over dinner and drinks with friends—but not publicly.
Yes, it's a form of cowardice—but one that I have practiced myself for years.
8/ Like pretty much everyone for the past few years, I have lived in fear of being canceled.
I have censored myself—especially on Twitter.
I have read draft tweets ten times over for possible offensiveness.
9/ I have refrained from expressing views that are extremely mainstream and eminently sensible (outside of Twitter).
I have virtue-signaled, liking and retweeting posts that I know will find favor with the right people.
I have played the game.
10/ But you know what? I'm tired.
Walking this tightrope, day after day, is exhausting.
(And as the Yale Law email controversy demonstrates, I'll probably fall off anyway; it's just a matter of time.)
11/ Monday was National Coming Out Day. So I'm "coming out"—as someone who thinks that cancel culture might be a problem and free speech might be in danger.
(Before folks accuse me of insensitivity to LGBTQ+ people, I should mention I'm gay.)
12/ Why am I taking a stand now? As I explain in my Yale Law post, this latest ridiculousness is what's leading me to speak out.
It's simply too absurd. It's clear evidence that things have spiraled out of control. It would be funny if it weren't so awful.
13/ Read this great article about the Yale Law brouhaha by @aaronterr1 of @TheFIREorg, who interviewed the law student who sent the supposedly offensively email.
15/ But let me add caveats; my position is far from extreme.
As I write in my Yale Law post (excerpt below), I admit that not all complaints about cancel culture are valid. And crying "cancel culture" can itself be a form of weaponized victimhood.
16/ But right now, at least, the dangers posed by illiberalism and political correctness outweigh those posed by excessive focus on cancel culture.
We must not take freedom of speech and thought for granted. Instead, we must stand up for these values.
17/ My family is originally from the Philippines, where a brave journalist named @MariaRessa just won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Read about her work if you're not familiar with it—and be thankful for our First Amendment.
1/ THREAD. There is now a push to get Trent Colbert, the Yale Law School student who sent the “trap-house email,” removed as a 2L student representative.
Here’s the form letter the students who want him removed are circulating for signature.
2/ This is a terrible idea. I think it’s unfair to Trent Colbert, who I believe is the victim here.
But even if you disagree, this will just increase the ability of @fedsoc & @TheFIREorg to claim free-speech martyrdom. See @mjs_DC:
3/ Ousting Trent Colbert will just pour more gasoline on the fire.
The YLS email controversy has already made Slate and the @washingtonpost. This latest development could get it into a few more papers (maybe @nytimes).
1/ Assuming even the partial accuracy of what @aaronsibarium just wrote (apparently based in part on leaked audio), what's going on at Yale Law School is deeply disturbing.
1/ THREAD. Should I get a #covid19 booster shot? I just got an email from @nyulangone telling me that I’m eligible:
2/ I assume that I’m eligible for a booster shot as an “individual 18 through 64 years of age at high risk of severe #Covid_19”— since, well, I actually HAD severe Covid-19.
3/ Based on research showing that folks like me who had #covid19 and then got fully vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine have very strong immunity, some experts say we don’t need boosters. (I got Pfizer, FYI.)
1/ It's nice to have some good news about #COVID19 amidst all the bad news.
The latest good news: research suggests that folks who already had #COVID and then get vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine enjoy a "superhuman" immunity to Covid and related viruses.
2/ Here's an @NPR article about the latest research into what's known as "hybrid immunity," which immunologist @profshanecrotty describes as "impressively potent."
3/ This very strong immunity from natural infection plus vaccination—an immunity not just to #COVID19 but to certain other coronaviruses—is yet another reason to get #vaccinated even if you already had Covid.
“Among unvaccinated workers who are not self-employed, about 7 in 10 say they would likely quit if their employer required them to be #vaccinated and did not grant a medical or religious exemption.”
3/ We are all getting really tired of the pandemic. But it’s far from over, as this article by @MitchKSmith and @juliebosman makes clear, with 1,500+ dying of #covid19 on most days of the week.