1/ THREAD. There is now a push to get Trent Colbert, the Yale Law School student who sent the “trap-house email,” removed as a 2L student representative.
Here’s the form letter the students who want him removed are circulating for signature.
2/ This is a terrible idea. I think it’s unfair to Trent Colbert, who I believe is the victim here.
But even if you disagree, this will just increase the ability of @fedsoc & @TheFIREorg to claim free-speech martyrdom. See @mjs_DC:
3/ Ousting Trent Colbert will just pour more gasoline on the fire.
The YLS email controversy has already made Slate and the @washingtonpost. This latest development could get it into a few more papers (maybe @nytimes).
4/ Some folks who disagree with me have said, “How was Trent Colbert ‘canceled’? Two YLS administrators just had a few nice conversations with him, trying to help him.”
5/ Getting Trent Colbert ousted from his position as a Yale Law School student rep position sounds a lot more like cancellation.
Look, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying losing this post will ruin his life. But it’s not a good thing.
6/ I will add this, for consistency: Yale Law School administrators should also not get involved in this attempt to get Trent Colbert removed as a student rep (even if it might generate more negative publicity for YLS).
7/ As noted above, I think removing Trent Colbert as a student representative is not a good idea (to put it mildly).
But assuming it's consistent with the governing docs (I haven't checked), the Yale law students have the right to do this if they want.
8/ Personally I think ousting Trent Colbert a mistake.
But if it is a mistake, maybe it's a mistake the students can learn from.
2/ The post is doing excellent traffic, getting tons of reads, and I'm getting many new sign-ups for my Substack, Original Jurisdiction.
After 8 hours or so, the post has gotten more than 10,000 views—which, for Original Jurisdiction, is huge.
3/ But here's what I find most interesting: the post is getting little traction on social media, especially Twitter. Very few links, mentions, retweets, etc.
1/ Assuming even the partial accuracy of what @aaronsibarium just wrote (apparently based in part on leaked audio), what's going on at Yale Law School is deeply disturbing.
1/ THREAD. Should I get a #covid19 booster shot? I just got an email from @nyulangone telling me that I’m eligible:
2/ I assume that I’m eligible for a booster shot as an “individual 18 through 64 years of age at high risk of severe #Covid_19”— since, well, I actually HAD severe Covid-19.
3/ Based on research showing that folks like me who had #covid19 and then got fully vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine have very strong immunity, some experts say we don’t need boosters. (I got Pfizer, FYI.)
1/ It's nice to have some good news about #COVID19 amidst all the bad news.
The latest good news: research suggests that folks who already had #COVID and then get vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine enjoy a "superhuman" immunity to Covid and related viruses.
2/ Here's an @NPR article about the latest research into what's known as "hybrid immunity," which immunologist @profshanecrotty describes as "impressively potent."
3/ This very strong immunity from natural infection plus vaccination—an immunity not just to #COVID19 but to certain other coronaviruses—is yet another reason to get #vaccinated even if you already had Covid.
“Among unvaccinated workers who are not self-employed, about 7 in 10 say they would likely quit if their employer required them to be #vaccinated and did not grant a medical or religious exemption.”
3/ We are all getting really tired of the pandemic. But it’s far from over, as this article by @MitchKSmith and @juliebosman makes clear, with 1,500+ dying of #covid19 on most days of the week.