We often think about conspiracy theories as being the purview of the far-right (i.e. QAnon). COVID-19 however has shown that elements of the left can be just as good at it.

Here are a bunch of receipts from Aus, and some thoughts on implications of this. Thread. #covid19aus
Conspiracy theories succeed through tapping into, often healthy, distrust of institutions, and turning that toward a belief in a shadowy plot of elites working against the general populace.
These plots are always impossible to disprove, making response really difficult. In fact a lack of evidence is often spoken about as evidence of the plot itself, as it suggests a mass cover up by those undertaking the conspiracy.
Conspiracy theories are also often hyper partisan. They create a bogeyman - an evil doer who has inherently evil intentions. Those engaging in the conspiracy theory are then framed as the just warriors of truth - the only ones willing to speak out against the grave injustice.
The left COVID conspiracy theories in Australia align to these traits. Pushed by often high-profile Labor or anti-Coalition partisans they have particularly targeted the response from the NSW Gov to the pandemic. The main claim has been that they have hidden COVID numbers.
This started early last year from high profile partisans like Vic Rollison, who, in the midst of the Victorian outbreak suggested that NSW's low numbers simply couldn't be true. How could NSW be handling an outbreak, when Vic couldn't?
This tweet follows a trend in conspriacy theories which suggests that something dodgy must be happening, even if what is not pointed to directly. MFWitches did something similar in a (recently deleted) tweet.
The former diplomat and political commentator Bruce Haigh has done similar. Like so many conspiracy theories, he is just 'asking questions'. What's wrong with questions?
Conspiracy theorists however have been more explicit than this as well. At one point MFWitches specifically stated that they believed the NSW Gov was hiding numbers.

Note, they specifically say there is no evidence for this. But they don't need evidence to spread disinformation.
Sometimes all of this is just based on a really bad understanding of the science and maths (like so many other conspiracy theories).
As I said, like most conspiracy theories, this is based in generic 'mistrust'. The mistrust is not based in histories of injustice (like genuine mistrust of the state say from PoC) but is often entirely partisan nature. I don't trust what is happening because of who is in charge.
I'll note here that I am not saying we should have blind faith in Governments and the state. There is a lot of things I don't trust them about. But I much rather direct my mistrust to the problems that are actually proven (there are so many) rather than completely made up ones.
Of course, the so called conspiracy also comes with a cover-up. In this case a belief that the NSW Gov has changed the way they report numbers to lessen them.
My favourite part of this tweet is the reference to Twitterati. Conspiracy theorists work hard to create their own 'knowledge' (do your own research they say!). In this case the mainstream media can't be trusted, so the research comes from others on Twitter.
Another example of this, with 'digital and entrepreneurial futurist' Craig Thomler claiming that the NSW Government somehow 'positively manages' the numbers (whatever the hell that means).
PR Guy also ran this rubbish, suggesting a major plot from the NSW Government to silence health practitioners to stop it getting out how bad it is. This was around strain on the health system. Again, he's just asking questions!
Disappointingly this was based on a Guardian article that stirred controversy over a social media policy in NSW Health. This sort of policy is common in Government. But the article made it look like a cover-up, taking a standard policy and turning it into a conspiracy.
One of the things I love is when they insist that they aren't conspiracy theorists, trying to desperately distance themselves from the likes of QAnon. But then go ahead to spout conspiracy ideas based in no actual facts.
Finally, the sometimes most entertaining, but also most dangerous part of the conspiracy theory, when people theorise about the evil plot by the Government. Apparently vaccines in NSW were rushed into Liberal held seats before Labor seats to allow more Labor voters to die.
This same thread suggests the NSW and Federal Government was denying other states access to vaccines entirely for partisan reasons. They'd let people die so boost their own political agenda. It's actually out of this world.
Sadly it was shared by a number of high-profile figures, including the (previous?) darling of the left and Greens candidate Julian Burnside.
Why does this all matter? Because conspiracy theories can be dangerous. This has been a campaign of disinformation. It not only breeds distrust in NSW Health, but also foments a type of thinking and argument that relies on partisan speculation more than actual critical thinking.
It also shows conspiracy theories are not just the purview of the right. If we want to take them seriously we need to look in many ways at the left just as much as the right. It's extraordinarily frustrating that this comes from people who would then call QAnon people idiots.
Anyway, here are the receipts. We have a real problem in the Australia left. COVID-19 and hyperpartisanship is rotting the debate. It's depressing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Copland

Simon Copland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SimonCopland

27 Sep
Incoming: long thread about the #melbourneprotests. TLDR: the institutional left are massively failing in the response, and in doing so I really worry are going to push even more people to the far-right. #tradiesprotest #covid19aus
Before I begin, a note about what I mean by the institutional left, because I always get in trouble about this. I’m specifically referring to those in powerful mainstream orgs – the ALP, elements of the Greens, unions, left-wing think tanks and some progressive NGOs.
There’s been a lot of debate about the Melbourne protests, and whether they are all from the far-right. There was a mix – tradies with genuine issues and right-wing grifters who latched on. At times those two are the same, with an influence of the right in construction industry.
Read 25 tweets
17 Mar
Nope, this is a seriously stupid idea. #auspol dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/nsw-p…
It's not just that this is unromantic, it's that it fundamentally misunderstands sexual relationships. Relationships are not transactions in which one person (a man) asks an other party (a woman) for sex, who then, reluctantly, agrees.
Relationships are spaces of mutual desire, lust, communication and ongoing negotiation.

Consent should be thought about in the same way. It is not a transaction. It's a mutual process requiring ongoing communication and sometimes even negotiation.
Read 8 tweets
26 Jan
This proposal (and the responses to it) are a perfect example of the serious challenges we face in the regulation/moderation of discourse on the web. Thread. 1/15 #Twitter #Birdwatch #SocialMedia
It is clear that Twitter has, rightfully, concluded that they want to remove themselves somewhat from the process of moderation. They, alongside other companies, have faced significant backlash over their approaches and are searching for ways to outsource the process. 2/15
This controversy is well deserved, and we should be very skeptical of these companies having complete control over these decisions. Twitter's main priority is profit and they make decisions primarily to appease advertisers. 3/15
Read 15 tweets
12 Jan
TLDR: social media bans may reduce extremist content on a platform, but they push the issue somewhere else. They make it "someone else's problem".
One thing to note is that this research is about relatively low-profile bans on Reddit. The ban of Donald Trump is much more serious and is leading to literally hundreds of thousands of people moving to platforms like Gab. It moves these platforms away from the fringes.
While not every Trump fan will move to Gab or Parler (if it comes back online), many many will. His reach overall will decrease, but those people who do move will encounter more extreme places.
Read 5 tweets
14 Dec 20
This video is a good example of a lot of the things I find frustrating about #masculinity discourse, particularly in gay circles. 1/10
Initially it's an interesting discussion. Jacob Michael talks about the issues with masculine norms and I agree that gay men can be good at challenging these. When you break one norm (around sexuality) it can become easier to break them around gender. 2/10
But I find the way he talks about male behaviour frustrating.

He speaks as if men, in particular gay men, can only into masculine things (sports, gyms etc.) because it's the way to show their masculinity. Those things are all just about proving masculinity. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
14 Jan 20
Some, not entirely complete, thoughts over the suicide of Wilson Gavin after the drag protest earlier this week.

First, as I said yesterday, this whole this is absolutely awful. Their protest was awful, and his suicide is awful too. The whole thing is awful. 1/10
Similar to the thread I retweeted from @maevemarsden, I am extraordinarily uncomfortable with people trying to diagnose why Gavin committed suicide.

We don't know why he did it, and attempts to describe why based off the little information we have is unhelpful. 2/10
I think this is particularly true for those who are assuming that he must somehow have been 'conflicted' about his same-sex attraction and conservative politics.

It is possible that is the case, but it is also entirely possible it wasn't. Again, we just don't know. 3/10
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(