"[O]ften inquisitors create heretics. [...] Inquisitors repress the heretical putrefaction so vehemently that many are driven, to share in it, in their hatred for the judges."
-Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose.
I dearly miss #UmbertoEco with his clinical insights on everything, from religion/belief to fascism. The quote above also reminded me of Arthur Koestler's Darkness at Noon, and in turn the Stalinist purges it was based on. A must read book for our times, I you ask me.
It's ironic that Stalin, the militant atheist, used methods that the Spanish Inquisition would have been proud of, to break down dissidents, on random pretenses, just like the former. And although the scale of those two is probably incomparable to other such instances ...
... Spanish Inquisition was not the first such instance in Human history, and Stalinist purges won't be the last. With the kind of surveillance apparatus the rulers have access to, imagine how easy it would be to break the dissidents -- when nothing is private anymore!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Back in my teens, I read Sunita Deshpande's (Marathi) book Aahe Manohar Tari
Loosely translated as: it's all pleasant but) from a line of a poem that end with "gamate udaas" (feels sad).
It was an important book in many ways.
1/
Sunita Deshpande was the wife of P. L. Deshpande -- Maharasthra's much loved writer, and a multi-talented person. He was primarily a humorist, but an astute observer of human traits and frailties. The book, an autobiography, generated a lot of controversy (more later).
2/
To introduce Sunita tai as "wife" of someone is an injustice to her, but for many, that's how they know her. She was a firebrand woman, independent thinker, outspoken, and courageous. She joined freedom struggle when she was 17 yo.
This is going to be the most difficult thread I've ever written. But I know I have to. For my own sanity, catharsis.
1/
In 2019, I lost a friend. He died of suicide. He was a classmate, and a colleague. We worked alongside each other for 8 years. We had lunches together. He was a gem of a person. Extremely intelligent, a 10x engineer (if there is such a thing). Soft-spoken. Without malice.
2/
No, I am not eulogising him. I know that most people who have known him would agree with this assessment. And in any case, it shouldn't matter if he wasn't all that I'm saying he was. Those are just details I could not not mention.
3/
My primary school was a govt. aided vernacular medium school run by an ed. institute (one of the better ones in my home city). My first recall of #caste is from when I was in 2nd/3rd.
1/
One of our teachers that year was NOT upper-caste (unlike most teachers in the school), and the predominantly upper-caste parents (including mine) weren't happy with the "quota" teacher. The general mood was "our education system is going to collapse due to quota"
2/
The thing is, this was decided based on his "surname", and of course based on prejudice of all the upper-caste teacher's, who had an obvious grudge against "quota system" that the govt. grant mandated. I don't even remember if he was a good or bad teacher.
3/
Long back, when I had just passed my 10th exam with decent marks, a distant relative who was an office bearer for "karhade brahmin sanghatana", or some such organization representing my born caste, visited our house to hand me a "prize"
1/
Incidentally, we were invited to attend a program to felicitate "bright" students from the community but hadn't turned up, so he had come home to deliver my cash prize. "I don't accept prizes that are caste-based", I said. He tried to convince me, but I was adamant.
2/
Give that money away to some deserving candidate from the (so-called) lower castes, I told him. Given my background, this isn't even an achievement, I told him.
3/
To follow up on a thread I RTed earlier on about "introverts", a common Marathi word thrown at introverts is "manus-ghana" (literally someone "repulsed by human beings"). Even in English, where we have anti-social and asocial, the former is used frequently for introverts.
1/
These implicit judgements in our language tend to strongly bias us, because, after all, they're just tokens of the social attitudes, passed on generations after generations -- just like caste names being used derogatively, thus making a group feel bad about themselves.
2/
Of course, I do not want to lessen the severity of the latter by equating it with the former -- it was to illustrate the point of what labels and biased language can do. Growing up in the eighties, spectacle use was rare at a young age, and anyone wearing them was bullied.
3/
One of my earliest jobs was at a startup. It was a toxic work culture. And over years, I've seen much better workplaces, and now culture is key criteria for me for work. But what I've observed is, people tend to discount the toxicity because "work is challenging" 1/
In the early years, when you want to learn a lot, sure, it does help to be in those sort of "cutting edge" (self-certified) workplaces, on purely the work axis. But given a chance to start fresh again, I'd not want to be in such setups. It does invisible damage. 2/
And it normalizes the toxic culture in the name of "productivity" and "achievement". The key years of your life are wasted without personal development because there is just no time. Even taking a day off is scoffed at. Self-care is basically office parties/events. 3/