Definition:
Internal links are links between your own pages,
within the same “site”,
(this may be the same subdomain, or across subdomains, depending on structure/organisation).
>>>
3/*
:: Features ::
Links often consist of:
* Location
* Content
* Attributes
Location:
The location may be a URL (different page),
a Fragment (specific point in the current page, or specific text (Fragment Directive)),
or both URL+Fragment (a part/text on a different page).
>>
4/*
Content:
Link content is typically Text, but may also default to the alt-attribute of an image, if an image is used/included within the anchor.
Content may be Blank (no text, no alt), Non-informative (holding/stub, such as “here”),
...
>>>
5/*
Content - Cont.
... Short (length constrained, as seen in many menus) or Free/Long (as we typically see in Contextual, Non-Contextual and In-Content links (see further down for these definitions :D))
>>>
6/*
Attribute:
The most known link attribute is “rel", with the Nofollow” value; and for SEO this (and newer sibling values “UGC” and “Sponsored”) are the only ones that really count.
(Please avoid “noreferrer” unless needed, screws tracking/attribution)
>>>
7/*
:: Types ::
I typically break IL’s down into the following:
* Navigational / Site
* Sub Navigation
* Jump / Target
* Contextual block
* Non-Contextual block
* In-Content
It's important to understand that not all links are the same,
and are likely treated differently.
>>>
8/*
Navigational and Site Links:
These are the links in your Primary/Secondary Navigation systems (main menu, footer etc.)
In the majority of cases, they are similar to boilerplate, as they are consistent across the majority of pages.
>>>
9/*
Sub-Navigation Links:
These links are situational, reflecting where the user is within the site.
They may be semi-boilerplate, consistent across a small % of pages.
This can include breadcrumbs and sectional menus.
>>>
10/*
Jump Links/Target Anchors:
These links act as a kind of content-index, taking users to specific parts of the page/content (such as headings etc.). They typically appear at the start of the content, or in a side panel, being page-specific.
>>>
11/*
Contextual Block Links:
These links typically appear after the content, (or in a sideblock),
and point to related content or tag/category pages, including sibling and child pages, older content about the same topic etc.
(These can be viewed as a form of Sub-Nav)
>>>
12/*
Non-Contextual Links:
These links may appear after content, or in an adjacent block (or on homepages, main categories etc.).
They typically include things like recent/new or popular/recommended pages.
(These can be viewed as a form of Sub-Nav)
>>>
13/*
In-Content Links:
As the name implies, these are internal links that appear within the content, such as references to internal resources and other pages on-site.
These should be either topically relevant, or term relevant (such as disambiguation links)
>>>
14/*
:: Users ::
Links are meant for users (shocking!),
and to enable them to navigate websites.
Unfortunately, few invest in UX/IA research,
or apply basic SEO research prior to building the site, including it’s Navigation systems.
>>>
15/*
This can mean that users may not fully understand the terms used in Menus/Nav etc.,
often having to mentally work harder to get from A to B, or find C,
This can negatively impact pages visited, time-on-site, retention and ultimately conversions.
>>>
16/*
Pointers:
* Informative (Link Text or Img Alt Attrib (IAA))
* Consistent (LT / IAA)
* Distinct (make it clear it’s not “just text” (or Image)
* Reactive (do Not style visited the same as unvisited)
* Quantity (do Not link to the same URL 47 times in the same page!)
Heads up, Thread about Internal Links incoming,
(Which I'm grateful for the 3% lead, as I've half written it already :) (and my eldest tried to spike it towards Keywords, knowing I've not touched that topic yet- sod!))
24 tweets in ...
... maybe I should split it?
:D
Erm - apparently, I have to stop there!
Did you know ...
Twitter has a 24 tweets in series limit?
(Did anyone?)
I can add more tweets once I've posted the rest!
So I think I may split it into 2 threads,
(as reading through 20+ tweets has to be painful for most people)
For many businesses, it is typically cheaper, faster and easier to keep existing consumers/clients than to try to win them back.
(Subsequently, it's cheaper to win them back than get new)
Far to often though, you will see businesses get this wrong.
And not just SMBs, but look at Banks, TV Service providers etc.
They will offer all sorts of deals to get new consumers,
but don't offer the same/similar value to reward existing ones.
(threaten to leave ;))
>>>
>>>
The typical mindset is existing clients/customers are "banked money" - they own you, you're a safe couple of quid, you don't need nurturing etc. (your money is theirs, already!)
So their efforts go on Clawbacks (recently left) and Acquisitions (inc. Poaching!).
The majority (but not all!) come from "marketing",
rather than "digital marketing".
And, in many cases, it seems more aimed at things like DigitalAds or SMM, often looking at Last Click etc.
But, why are people saying it;
esp. if they are from "real" marketing?
>>>
3/*
Now, for most of us - the statement is actually true (-ish).
Few of us get to work with hard-attribution (physical tickets etc.).
That means most of us deal with incomplete data,
often with inaccuracies.
But that in no way makes attribution BS or useless!