1/🧵
Part 1
🚨::: Internal Links - What, Why, When, Where and How ::: 🚨

As Internal Links (ILs) are back in fashion (again),
I thought I'd do a thread (2 actually!)

I'll cover explanations here,
then SEO and Optimisations in Thread 2

Pls Retweet

🧵>>>

#SEO #InternalLinks
2/*

Definition:
Internal links are links between your own pages,
within the same “site”,
(this may be the same subdomain, or across subdomains, depending on structure/organisation).

>>>
3/*

:: Features ::
Links often consist of:
* Location
* Content
* Attributes

Location:
The location may be a URL (different page),
a Fragment (specific point in the current page, or specific text (Fragment Directive)),
or both URL+Fragment (a part/text on a different page).

>>
4/*

Content:
Link content is typically Text, but may also default to the alt-attribute of an image, if an image is used/included within the anchor.
Content may be Blank (no text, no alt), Non-informative (holding/stub, such as “here”),
...

>>>
5/*

Content - Cont.
... Short (length constrained, as seen in many menus) or Free/Long (as we typically see in Contextual, Non-Contextual and In-Content links (see further down for these definitions :D))

>>>
6/*

Attribute:
The most known link attribute is “rel", with the Nofollow” value; and for SEO this (and newer sibling values “UGC” and “Sponsored”) are the only ones that really count.
(Please avoid “noreferrer” unless needed, screws tracking/attribution)

>>>
7/*

:: Types ::
I typically break IL’s down into the following:
* Navigational / Site
* Sub Navigation
* Jump / Target
* Contextual block
* Non-Contextual block
* In-Content

It's important to understand that not all links are the same,
and are likely treated differently.

>>>
8/*

Navigational and Site Links:
These are the links in your Primary/Secondary Navigation systems (main menu, footer etc.)
In the majority of cases, they are similar to boilerplate, as they are consistent across the majority of pages.

>>>
9/*

Sub-Navigation Links:
These links are situational, reflecting where the user is within the site.
They may be semi-boilerplate, consistent across a small % of pages.
This can include breadcrumbs and sectional menus.

>>>
10/*

Jump Links/Target Anchors:
These links act as a kind of content-index, taking users to specific parts of the page/content (such as headings etc.). They typically appear at the start of the content, or in a side panel, being page-specific.

>>>
11/*

Contextual Block Links:
These links typically appear after the content, (or in a sideblock),
and point to related content or tag/category pages, including sibling and child pages, older content about the same topic etc.
(These can be viewed as a form of Sub-Nav)

>>>
12/*

Non-Contextual Links:
These links may appear after content, or in an adjacent block (or on homepages, main categories etc.).
They typically include things like recent/new or popular/recommended pages.
(These can be viewed as a form of Sub-Nav)

>>>
13/*

In-Content Links:
As the name implies, these are internal links that appear within the content, such as references to internal resources and other pages on-site.
These should be either topically relevant, or term relevant (such as disambiguation links)

>>>
14/*

:: Users ::
Links are meant for users (shocking!),
and to enable them to navigate websites.

Unfortunately, few invest in UX/IA research,
or apply basic SEO research prior to building the site, including it’s Navigation systems.

>>>
15/*

This can mean that users may not fully understand the terms used in Menus/Nav etc.,
often having to mentally work harder to get from A to B, or find C,

This can negatively impact pages visited, time-on-site, retention and ultimately conversions.

>>>
16/*

Pointers:
* Informative (Link Text or Img Alt Attrib (IAA))
* Consistent (LT / IAA)
* Distinct (make it clear it’s not “just text” (or Image)
* Reactive (do Not style visited the same as unvisited)
* Quantity (do Not link to the same URL 47 times in the same page!)

>>>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lyndon NA (Darth Autocrat)

Lyndon NA (Darth Autocrat) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @darth_na

22 Oct
17/🧵
Part 2
🚨::: Internal Links - What, Why, When, Where and How ::: 🚨

(Part 1 = )

The second Thread covers the 2 bits you are likely more interested in:
* SEO
* Optimisation
of Internal links.

Please Retweet

>>>

#SEO #InternalLinks
18/*
:: SEO ::
Finally - the bits you’ve been waiting for!
SEO aspects of Internal Links:
* Crawling
* Indexing
* Ranking
* Hybrid

>>>
19/*
Crawling :
SE’s (can/do/may) use links for URL discovery - they note the destination of the URL and add it to a crawl queue.

(They may also note “patterns”, and attempt to “guess” URLs, sometimes looking at JS etc. to do so.)

>>>
Read 35 tweets
22 Oct
Heads up, Thread about Internal Links incoming,
(Which I'm grateful for the 3% lead, as I've half written it already :) (and my eldest tried to spike it towards Keywords, knowing I've not touched that topic yet- sod!))
24 tweets in ...
... maybe I should split it?

:D
Erm - apparently, I have to stop there!

Did you know ...
Twitter has a 24 tweets in series limit?
(Did anyone?)

I can add more tweets once I've posted the rest!

So I think I may split it into 2 threads,
(as reading through 20+ tweets has to be painful for most people)
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
.
::: Retention > Reclaiming > Acquisitions :::

(Caveat - usually)

For many businesses, it is typically cheaper, faster and easier to keep existing consumers/clients than to try to win them back.
(Subsequently, it's cheaper to win them back than get new)

>>>

via @CarrieHill
>>>

Far to often though, you will see businesses get this wrong.

And not just SMBs, but look at Banks, TV Service providers etc.

They will offer all sorts of deals to get new consumers,
but don't offer the same/similar value to reward existing ones.
(threaten to leave ;))

>>>
>>>

The typical mindset is existing clients/customers are "banked money" - they own you, you're a safe couple of quid, you don't need nurturing etc. (your money is theirs, already!)

So their efforts go on Clawbacks (recently left) and Acquisitions (inc. Poaching!).

>>>
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
🧵
::: Attribution - is it really BS ? :::

I've seen a steady rise in tweets and discussions around #Attribution;
and many state/suggest that it's a load of crap.

🧵 Read More >>>

#MarketingTwitter #Marketing #DigitalMarketing Image : Chart : Amusing chart, with rises, plateaus and fall
2/*

The majority (but not all!) come from "marketing",
rather than "digital marketing".
And, in many cases, it seems more aimed at things like DigitalAds or SMM, often looking at Last Click etc.

But, why are people saying it;
esp. if they are from "real" marketing?

>>>
3/*

Now, for most of us - the statement is actually true (-ish).
Few of us get to work with hard-attribution (physical tickets etc.).

That means most of us deal with incomplete data,
often with inaccuracies.

But that in no way makes attribution BS or useless!

>>>
Read 17 tweets
15 Oct
🧵
::: Size of site is not the same as Quality or Authority :::

There really does seem to be a confusion between:
* Shallow thinking
* Simple logic

As with "Longform Content", it's not Quantity,
it's what's contained and how it's structured.

Please Retweet
#SEO

Read More >>> Image
2/*

Now, Google will downplay this as hard/fast as they can, and there will be all sorts of semantic-slides.

Anyone that has done this for some time knows that in many cases - Big sites rank better
(be it hundreds of thousands of pages, a Brand, or both)

>>>
3/*

The problem is, that many people seem to jump to the conclusion that it's because they are a Brand-site, or a Mega-site.

There are in fact multiple reasons why this happens,
and not all Brand/Mega's dominate.
Smaller sites can win/rank against.

>>>
Read 17 tweets
1 Oct
1/🧵
🚨!!! Do NOT just delete content for SEO !!!🚨

Doing this wrong can harm your (clients) sites!

You should only do this after a proper content performance audit.

And, unlike Brian, I’ll actually explain WHY this can help/harm your rankings!

🧵>>>

#SEO #Backlinko Image : composite : Text, screen shot of an old article and
2/*

How does it help?

Site Quality.
Google uses more than just "page-level" metrics

Link value flow.
Removing pages may mean fewer internal links, thus more PageRank flowing through links.

Improved crawling.
Not wasting crawls on garbage.

But there are RISKS!

>>> How does Deleting pages help?  Removing pages "can"
3/*

How can that be harmful?

There’s lots of damage you may do - here’s 5 risks.

Inbound links.
You might remove pages that have Inbound links, which give you ranking value.
If the page is deleted, you lose those link values!

>>> How can Deleting pages harm a site?  Removing pages can harm
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(