17/🧵
Part 2
🚨::: Internal Links - What, Why, When, Where and How ::: 🚨

(Part 1 = )

The second Thread covers the 2 bits you are likely more interested in:
* SEO
* Optimisation
of Internal links.

Please Retweet

>>>

#SEO #InternalLinks
18/*
:: SEO ::
Finally - the bits you’ve been waiting for!
SEO aspects of Internal Links:
* Crawling
* Indexing
* Ranking
* Hybrid

>>>
19/*
Crawling :
SE’s (can/do/may) use links for URL discovery - they note the destination of the URL and add it to a crawl queue.

(They may also note “patterns”, and attempt to “guess” URLs, sometimes looking at JS etc. to do so.)

>>>
20/*

Indexing :
Links also contribute towards Topicality (Relevance, via Link-text/Image Alt Attrib.).

But it’s not just the Destination URL they hold influence for!
The “content” of the link may also influence the Origin page too!

>>>
21/*

Ranking :
The most well known aspect of Links (Inbound/Outbound and Internal) is of course “PageRank” and “Authority”.

Internal links pass value, similar to InBound and OutBound links,
and aid in distributing the value of InBound Links to other pages.

>>>
22/*

Then we have hybrid influences, such as;

Crawl priority :
This can be influenced by how “important” a page appears to be, including the quantity of Internal and InBound links, the “depth of linkage” (how many clicks from X to Y), and the “value” of the linking pages.

>>>
23/*

Canonical selection :
Though you might indicate a preferred URL via the Canonical link element (CLE),
Google may choose a different URL if you have duplicates/highly similar content.

This may be influenced by ILs (quantity, value, prominence etc., as well as IbLs).

>>>
24/*

As you can see - Internal Links play a Massive role in On-Site Optimisation.

(No, I have no idea why so many SEOs ignore/forget this!)

And this leads us to ... Optimisation!

>>>
25/*

::: Optimising :::

Optimising Internal Links is not as straightforward/simple as it sometimes seem (or some people suggest).

There are multiple (possible) facets of Internal Links to consider, which can make things more complicated (if you want to "optimise").

>>>
26/*

Link Features :
* Visibility (or requires User Interaction)
* Number of links to the same destination
* "Link text" of link
* If there are multiple links to the same destination (Menu + In-content etc.)
* Number of links on the page (Internal, Internal+OutBound)

>>>
27/*

Link Features (Cont. 1) :
* Number of pages linking to destination
* Value of linking page(s)* Type of Link (In-content, Nav, Contextual etc.)
* Visual position of link (page)
* Visual position/order of link (within type/block)

>>>
28/*

Link Features (Cont. 2) :
* Styling of link (bigger/bolder, smaller/weaker etc.)
* Variant Destination URL (and canonicalisation!)
* Hierarchal position of linking page (click depth/ease of reach)
etc.

>>>
29/*

When you consider some of those, you can see why there is no singular "best practice", as it can (does!) depend on the site/page, content type/purpose, design/structure of the site etc.

So, when you see people
"link to at least 5 other pages"
(subtweeting),
it's BS!

>>>
30/*

So, rather than "hard and fast" tips, here's a bunch of loose ones for you to think of, to help guide you.

1) Limit your "link blocks"
Some pages make sense to have "recent" or "hottest" links etc., others do not!

>>>
31/*

2) Consider converting Non-Contextual to Semi-Contextual
See if you can use "recent" or "popular",
but in a contextual way (recent products of type X when on the Category X page, rather than non-category items being listed).

>>>
32/*

3) Remember, non-permanent links may cause fluctuations
If you use non-permanent links (contextual, non-contextual (or semi) links), these tend to rotate/change over time!
Ranking benefits may slowly decline over time (good for getting initial crawl/index though! :D).

>>>
33/*

4) Don't use "dumb" automated links!
a) Try to manually select at least a few "contextual" links that appear after/next to main content
b) Avoid auto-linking "keywords" (47 links in the same page to the same destination is stupid).

>>>
34/*

5) Use informative "Link Text"
Do not use dummy/stub content, such as "click here".
If possible, use a bit of context, not just "the keyword".
Consider using the main Heading or Title of the destination, or a variation of it.

>>>
35/*

6) Don't vary "Link Text" (A) (too much)
a) If you link to the same destination 2+ times,
the link text should ideally be identical (else the user may think it's for different pages).
b) Unless you are using Fragments (inc. scroll to text),
then variation makes sense

>>>
36/*

7) Don't vary "Link Text" (B) (too much)
You will likely link to Page X from multiple other pages.
All of those links should ideally have the same/highly similar "link text".
(Do NOT have 20 internal links, with 5+ very different link texts)
37/*

8) Don't "hide" your links (if you can help it)
If you are linking from Page A to Page B,
it should be to help the User go from A to B.
Hiding links in interactive blocks may not be ideal

>>>
38/*

9) Consider the User Journey/Stage flow
Depending on the nature of the site, you may have multiple pages that cover each separate stage of the consumer journey (or should have!!!).
Make sure you interlink each stage to the previous/next stage
39/*

10) Less is more!
The more links, the more the page value may be divided (less value through each link).
So clearly, the fewer links, the more value that may pass to the destination.

11) Don't skimp!
Tip (10) does Not mean you should skip logical/helpful links!
40/*

12) Assign appropriately
Not all pages have equal value to the business/site.
Ideally, you want more links to "action" pages than "supporting" pages.
Thus Products should have more links to them than the care page or buyer guide (you do have those pages, right?)

>>>
41/*

13) Watch your Pagination!
Sometimes, the default Pager setup is a bit sucky, and may lead to an unnecessary number of links.
If so, consider limiting to X number, including First, Last, Previous, Next and a few pages either side of current.
(Use a Jump to page form to!)
42/*

14) Avoid "NoFollow"
Seriously - there are very few cases where the use of the nofollow rel attribute is required on Internal Links.
It does Not conserve PageRank or such (G fixed that a decade ago!)

>>>
43/*

15) Avoid "blocked" pages
Not always avoidable, but linking to pages that aren't crawlable (robots.txt disallowed), or indexable (noindex meta-robot or x-robot header) means the value basically gets wasted/lost.
(No, nofollow won't help "conserve" that value!)

>>>
44/*

16) Consider the "PageRank"/Value of the page
The more "value" the page has, the more value that is meant to pass through the links.
This means you could potentially concentrate that value, or spread it out amongst more pages (depending on value, goals and destination(s)).
45/*

17) There is no "best number" of Internal Links
As per (16), there is no "optimum" or "minimum" number of Internal Links you should have.
(Seriously, 5 links minimum? Get off the bus!)

>>>
46/*

18) Push new and/or deeper content via Important/Prominent pages
Some pages will have a lot of "link value".

You may/can get new pages crawled/indexed quicker,
or get more bot attention to "deeper" pages by linking from stronger/prominent pages.

>>>
47/*

19) Mind your Canonicals!

domin,tld/directory/page?x=1&y=2&z=3
domin,tld/directory/page?z=3&x=1&y=2
domin,tld/directory/page?y=2&z=3&x=1

All of these will (typically) show the same content,
they are the same page.
Unless you're a bot.
Then it's 3 different URLs!

>>>
48/*

20) Link to your preferred Canonical
In some cases, there are legit reasons to have duplicate pages, or variants.
You may use the Canonical Link Element to point to your preferred version.

But if you then go an link to a different version,
G may choose that instead!

>>>
49/*

21) Old to New
Quite often, you will see new articles, with links to previous pieces.

Yet you will then notice that they do not go back, edit the older pieces, and link to the newer!

Do it!

Link your old to new, benefit from in-content, relevant links!

>>>
50/* (For @clorinda__ :D)

22) New to Old
Tip (21) does not mean you shouldn't link to older content. In some cases, it makes perfect sense.
But, do stop and think.
Ask yourself (or check your data!) if the older page serves any business or user purpose.
(possibly merge?)
Okay ... is that enough,
or do people really want a longer thread, with more tips, thoughts or suggestions?

:D

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lyndon NA (Darth Autocrat)

Lyndon NA (Darth Autocrat) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @darth_na

22 Oct
1/🧵
Part 1
🚨::: Internal Links - What, Why, When, Where and How ::: 🚨

As Internal Links (ILs) are back in fashion (again),
I thought I'd do a thread (2 actually!)

I'll cover explanations here,
then SEO and Optimisations in Thread 2

Pls Retweet

🧵>>>

#SEO #InternalLinks
2/*

Definition:
Internal links are links between your own pages,
within the same “site”,
(this may be the same subdomain, or across subdomains, depending on structure/organisation).

>>>
3/*

:: Features ::
Links often consist of:
* Location
* Content
* Attributes

Location:
The location may be a URL (different page),
a Fragment (specific point in the current page, or specific text (Fragment Directive)),
or both URL+Fragment (a part/text on a different page).

>>
Read 17 tweets
22 Oct
Heads up, Thread about Internal Links incoming,
(Which I'm grateful for the 3% lead, as I've half written it already :) (and my eldest tried to spike it towards Keywords, knowing I've not touched that topic yet- sod!))
24 tweets in ...
... maybe I should split it?

:D
Erm - apparently, I have to stop there!

Did you know ...
Twitter has a 24 tweets in series limit?
(Did anyone?)

I can add more tweets once I've posted the rest!

So I think I may split it into 2 threads,
(as reading through 20+ tweets has to be painful for most people)
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
.
::: Retention > Reclaiming > Acquisitions :::

(Caveat - usually)

For many businesses, it is typically cheaper, faster and easier to keep existing consumers/clients than to try to win them back.
(Subsequently, it's cheaper to win them back than get new)

>>>

via @CarrieHill
>>>

Far to often though, you will see businesses get this wrong.

And not just SMBs, but look at Banks, TV Service providers etc.

They will offer all sorts of deals to get new consumers,
but don't offer the same/similar value to reward existing ones.
(threaten to leave ;))

>>>
>>>

The typical mindset is existing clients/customers are "banked money" - they own you, you're a safe couple of quid, you don't need nurturing etc. (your money is theirs, already!)

So their efforts go on Clawbacks (recently left) and Acquisitions (inc. Poaching!).

>>>
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
🧵
::: Attribution - is it really BS ? :::

I've seen a steady rise in tweets and discussions around #Attribution;
and many state/suggest that it's a load of crap.

🧵 Read More >>>

#MarketingTwitter #Marketing #DigitalMarketing Image : Chart : Amusing chart, with rises, plateaus and fall
2/*

The majority (but not all!) come from "marketing",
rather than "digital marketing".
And, in many cases, it seems more aimed at things like DigitalAds or SMM, often looking at Last Click etc.

But, why are people saying it;
esp. if they are from "real" marketing?

>>>
3/*

Now, for most of us - the statement is actually true (-ish).
Few of us get to work with hard-attribution (physical tickets etc.).

That means most of us deal with incomplete data,
often with inaccuracies.

But that in no way makes attribution BS or useless!

>>>
Read 17 tweets
15 Oct
🧵
::: Size of site is not the same as Quality or Authority :::

There really does seem to be a confusion between:
* Shallow thinking
* Simple logic

As with "Longform Content", it's not Quantity,
it's what's contained and how it's structured.

Please Retweet
#SEO

Read More >>> Image
2/*

Now, Google will downplay this as hard/fast as they can, and there will be all sorts of semantic-slides.

Anyone that has done this for some time knows that in many cases - Big sites rank better
(be it hundreds of thousands of pages, a Brand, or both)

>>>
3/*

The problem is, that many people seem to jump to the conclusion that it's because they are a Brand-site, or a Mega-site.

There are in fact multiple reasons why this happens,
and not all Brand/Mega's dominate.
Smaller sites can win/rank against.

>>>
Read 17 tweets
1 Oct
1/🧵
🚨!!! Do NOT just delete content for SEO !!!🚨

Doing this wrong can harm your (clients) sites!

You should only do this after a proper content performance audit.

And, unlike Brian, I’ll actually explain WHY this can help/harm your rankings!

🧵>>>

#SEO #Backlinko Image : composite : Text, screen shot of an old article and
2/*

How does it help?

Site Quality.
Google uses more than just "page-level" metrics

Link value flow.
Removing pages may mean fewer internal links, thus more PageRank flowing through links.

Improved crawling.
Not wasting crawls on garbage.

But there are RISKS!

>>> How does Deleting pages help?  Removing pages "can"
3/*

How can that be harmful?

There’s lots of damage you may do - here’s 5 risks.

Inbound links.
You might remove pages that have Inbound links, which give you ranking value.
If the page is deleted, you lose those link values!

>>> How can Deleting pages harm a site?  Removing pages can harm
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(