Site Quality.
Google uses more than just "page-level" metrics
Link value flow.
Removing pages may mean fewer internal links, thus more PageRank flowing through links.
Improved crawling.
Not wasting crawls on garbage.
But there are RISKS!
>>>
3/*
How can that be harmful?
Thereโs lots of damage you may do - hereโs 5 risks.
Inbound links.
You might remove pages that have Inbound links, which give you ranking value.
If the page is deleted, you lose those link values!
>>>
4/*
Internal links.
Your pages should interlink. They not only permit value to flow, but provide Relevance via Link Text.
Removing pages may alter (potentially harming) Topicality and PageRank of other pages!
>>>
5/*
Non-SE Traffic.
Not all traffic is from Search Engines (or shouldnโt be!).
Some of your pages should receive inter-site and direct traffic (such as from Twitter or Bookmarks).
Deleting these is not going to please some users!
>>>
6/*
Seasonal/Trending shifts.
Sometimes, a pageโs SE traffic may be low/non-existent due to the time of year etc.
At certain points, it may increase (massively).
Do Not just go by โrecentโ SE Traffic data, else you may cut a seasonal bloomer.
>>>
7/*
Conversion path.
Conversion can be a gradual process - with users visiting many pages (info, trust etc.).
Some of these pages arenโt seen in the same session - spread over several, across different devices and/or accounts.
Removing these pages may harm conversions!
>>>
8/*
Okay doomsayer, if youโre so cleverโฆ
โฆ how do we get the benefits, without the negatives?
* By doing a (proper!) Content Audit!
* By choosing the right Action (deletion is just one option)
>>>
9/*
Content Auditing:
You need to look at metrics/KPIs that arenโt just SE based.
You want things like;
* Ranking position (by term, per page)
* Traffic (by source)
* Conversion Value (by source)
* If contributes to Conversions (by conversion page/by source)
>>>
10/*
Content Auditing (cont.(1)):
* Interaction level (time on page, scroll depth etc.)
* Engagements (comments, social shares etc.)
* Inbound Links (quality/type/traffic/conversions)
* If it links to important/ranking pages
* Quality/User value of the content
>>>
11/*
Content Auditing (cont.(2)):
* Purpose of page
* Similarity of page (topic/intent/functionality)
And you want to check all of those over a duration (at least 13 months, ideally 25+)
Look at your content from a Business perspective, not an SEO only one!
>>>
12/*
Once youโve got Audit, you can start to make proper, informed (lower risk) decisions.
You can decide on 1 of 4 actions (5 actually):
* Leave
* Revise
* Merge
* Remove (+1)
The right choice can help you improve your SEO,
and avoid hurting the site/business!
>>>
13/*
Actions:
Leave.
If the page performs well across the board -
leave it alone!
Revise.
If the page fluctuates in the SERPs and/or has low SE value,
but has strong performance in other areas -
consider improving it .
Make a copy/backup first!
>>>
14/*
Actions (cont.(1)):
Merge.
If you have 2+ pages that serve the same purpose, target the same/similar term(s), overlap in topic etc. -
consolidate via 301 Redirect (or canonicalisation) (and update links/sitemap etc.).
Make a backup/extract comments etc. first!
>>>
15/*
Actions (cont.(2)):
Remove.
If the page sucks, provides no value or serves no purpose -
Then itโs a candidate for Deletion.
If the page has low/no SE value, but has some value to Users, NoIndex it (the 5th option!)
Preferably, unpublish or make a backup!
>>>
16/*
Do the Audit, choose the right Action,
you may not only get the 3 initial benefits:
* Improved site quality
* More internal link value
* Crawl performance
You may also get
* Consolidated ranking values
* Better content
* Unharmed/Improved value/topicality flow
>>>
17/*
Then monitor!
Watch GSC, see if SE things improve.
Watch your analytics, check conversion rate/value.
Make sure nothing is wrong.
Because you didnโt delete, (or backed stuff up), you can reverse it if needed!
Note:
Quality may take 6+ months to see G respond!!!
>>>
18/*
I know, it sounds like a lot of work.
It can be (esp. on Huge sites!)
But it is far better to sweat a bit and do it right,
than tank a site due to broad, uninformative advice and poor decisions!
Else you may find the site ends up like this...
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
: Writing about covered topics :
Chances are, you've clicked on a link to a piece ... and been disappointed.
It's either nigh identical to 1+ other pieces you've read,
or it's just fluff wrapping keywords.
Do Not produce that sort of content.
>>>
3/*
If the topic is already covered, you need to make yours "better".
Add more recent information/data.
Add insights from experience.
Take a different perspective.
Cover aspects the rest miss, or go deeper than they do.
The first thing most people miss (and I do mean Most!), is ...
GOALS.
Yes, you are doing SEO - but:
* SEO is not a goal
* Ranking is not a goal
* Traffic is not a goal (unless you are ad-rev based)
Money, Opportunity and Visibility are Goals.
SEO is just a method!
>>>
3/*
So the first thing you should be "scoring" your priorities by is the Goal they will be contributing to.
In most cases, that's going to be Money (Rev., Profit, via Traffic, via Rankings, via Keywords etc.)
Okay, I didn't even get to the list of 9 summarised points before I started itching.
It looks like the definition of "evergreen content" is based on it's ranking/traffic consistency,
not it's relevance/topical durability.
(Not the same things).
@aleyda@remotersnet * Schedule multiple meetings each and every day.
* Failing to have a a proper comms system in place.
* Not ensuring everyone has the right comms software/apps
* Not ensuring people know how to use the software/apps
* Failing to realise not everyone has access to good internet
@aleyda@remotersnet * Making last minute schedule changes and failing t notify properly
* Not making use of established collaborative tools
* Trying to work/make things the same as Real Life/In Person
* Treating comms as unidirectional, (a talk vs a meeting)
* Not considering the home environment
@aleyda@remotersnet * Assuming no travel means people will start earlier and finish later
* People failing to separate/juggle home/work
* Family not comprehending the shift
* Failing to ensure people are able to access the work-network externally
* Not providing adequate (or any) training
To begin with, you are unlikely to rank for shorter terms - so you have to go with long-tail.
Produce content for each stage & collection of terms per stage. This not only increases the number of terms you are likely to rank for, but naturally means lower competition.
>>>
/3
Over time, your site gains "weight", and it is easier to rank for shorter terms.
But you still produce content for each stage, and you still target longer queries.
Just be mindful of "term value".
Longtail may be "easier", but typically has small audiences.