Maybe you have one of those devices below at home.
They are getting smaller and more intelligent "to do stuff" directly.
Doing voice recognition directly on the phone is a good example for that: tcrn.ch/3EwloVp
Or also the #Tesla autopilot.
And this is great. Because intelligent devices mean better automation. Which saves costs. A LOT of costs.
But often implementations are insecure, get hacked or a central system goes down. Like when #Tesla users had no access to their cars (bit.ly/3ms2KI8).
So: Why not outtask 'security stuff' to a globally available data backbone which is never down by design? Everybody could use it and tap into it. Automation.
But the challenge is HUGE. With more devices online we are looking at potentially millions of interactions per second.
Enter the stage: #Blockchain:
A distributed, immutable trust layer, digital identities, no middlemen, cryptocurrencies for payments... awesome!
Not only for IoT, but for #DeFi, gaming etc. connecting millions.
So you ask: "But what's the problem? We have blockchain today!"
Remember the IoT example above? It's not only IoT any more, but has evolved into the #metaverse. We need capacity to interconnect billions of humans, organizations and devices securely, to really automate.
The problem: blockchain does not scale to the demand. But there's more:
High fees make it uneconomical. $20 per transaction is a hard no. How should that scale in business?
Low capacity, high energy use... But why is that so? Let's take a closer look behind the curtain of #blockchain:
A block is a container for transactions ("tx"). Only a limited number can fit into one block. They "fight" for space in the block. Pay more, get added faster. Fee too low? Please wait for the next block. Or the next. Or the next...
Simplified: that is because the validators (who secure the chain) want to get paid. So they pick & include the tx with the highest fees. When a block is full, it's shared in the network. This takes time. There are trade-offs, e.g. fewer validators -> faster decision making, BU...
Fewer validators mean you have to trust them more. Also not good. We want a distributed but secure system. That's called the Trilemma. ATM every blockchain trades off 1 feature to improve the other 2.
But we want more. Oh, also no tx fees and no energy waste pls.
Enter #IOTA. IOTA is not based on slow expensive blocks or miners or chains. It uses another underlying principle, to directly link transactions together. Not in blocks but directly. Users confirm other users tx directly.
The big advantage:
1) It's very green (the energy of 1 #bitcoin is equivalent to 600 Million to 1B #IOTA tx). 2) Tx happen in PARALLEL. Not sequentially like in a blockchain. No need to wait for a block. Scalability. 3) No miners to pay -> No transaction fee!
The implications are huge! Why?
Without having to pay fees, we can suddenly send data for free. A lot of data in many transactions. Cryptocurrency (IOTA Token) is also natively "baked in".
This enables highly scalable and free to low-fee DeFi applications, digital identity, secure data sharing + MANY use-cases
We're building #IOTA as an ecosystem, to truly solve the technical challenges of blockchain: high fees, few validators, low throughput, energy waste, but especially scaling, where even 64 or 120 "subchains" won't be enough.
If you made it this far: thank you.
ATM an awesome community is already building a #DAO, #DeFi, and many other exciting projects on #IOTA. Join us on discord.iota.org.
I don't have a soundcloud, but if you want to dive into it, I'd recommend these links:
No, that's not it. Look at the state of blockchain ATM. Most now aim to scale through L2 bc L1 just sucks for most. In addition they reduce the # of validators (Solana is extreme here, but you see it also at Eth2.0, BSC etc.), 1/7
(CC @vprokopev_AI )
2/7 to achieve speed. (Fewer validators can form a consensus quicker.) Also a blockchain is a linear list of tx in a block. If one conflicts you have to reroll the good ones as well. #IOTA essentially says: you don't need a serial list, but 1) we see a way how tx can be executed
3/7 in parallel ("blocksize=1tx") and avoid serial dependency, and 2) we extend Nakamoto consensus to have thousands/millions of validators in parallel (the initial spirit of blockchain) without compromising security. All of this with subsecond
Initially, #IOTA was designed with the IoT in mind - lightweight, highly scalable, no transaction fees, parallel transactions, no miners.
Turns out this is also a great technical basis for every other scenario as well.
Since 17/18 a lot of things have happened:
The project is one of the most ambitious in the whole DLT space. The aim is so high that some don't believe it's possible: "scam" "garbage" etc. And 18/19 was a valley of despair. There were technical misconceptions and unnecessary dirty laundry.
Also - research is not a straight road - no organization has ever researched a feeless DLT system based on a DAG.
But the team took all the learning from the past and redesigned a whole new system with the same principles in mind. The birth of the current #Chrysalis network.