New paper today estimates the per capita emissions gaps for 1.5C of global income groups in 2030, based on NDCs

Richest 1% set for footprints 30x 1.5C-aligned global level
Richest 10% - 9x higher
Middle 40% - 2x higher
Poorest 50% - 2x lower
@IEEP_eu @Oxfam @SEIclimate #COP26
In absolute terms, the consumption emissions of the richest 10% in 2030 are set to nearly amount to the global total in 2030 compatible with 1.5C (18Gt)

The poorest 90% are set to only just exceed that level

This is the #inequality behind the #emissionsgap
We estimate the share of emissions of the richest 1% are set to grow further following the 2015 Paris Agreement - reaching 16% of total global emissions by 2030

#inequality #COP26 #COP26Glasgow
NDCs ahead of #COP26 mean emissions cuts 4 the richest 1% of just 5% - compared to 97% needed to align with the 1.5C global per capita level

Richest 10% set for 11% cuts vs 90% needed

Mid 40% = 9% vs 57% needed

Poorest 50% cld increase a bit, but still way below that level
Biggest turnaround in emissions trends set to come from the global 'middle classes' - from rapid emissions growth 1990-2015 to emissions peak and plateau this decade - it's a sign of the 'Paris effect'

Deepest cuts set to come from lower/middle income citizens in rich countries
The geography of #carboninequality is changing. But 2030 we expect the biggest share of the emissions of the richest 1% from citizens of China - overtaking the USA - then India, then EU. Saudi Arabia and Brazil the next biggest contributors to emissions of the super rich
#COP26
#carboninequality also extreme at national level

In all major emitters, the richest 10% are set for footprints way in excess of the 1.5C global per capita level in 2030

Tackling #inequality must go hand in hand with cutting emissions #COP26 #COP26Glasgow

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Gore

Tim Gore Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tim_e_gore

4 Nov
Ahead of tomorrow's release of new @IEEP_eu @Oxfam @SEIclimate estimates of #carboninequality in 2030, based on the #NDCs...

...Here's a reminder of our work last year, as featured in the @UNEP #emissionsgap rpt 2020 🧵

#COP26 #COP26Glasgow

From 1990-2015, global cumulative emissions roughly doubled. Over half of these emissions (52%) were driven by the consumption of the richest 10% of people, using up 1/3 of the remaining carbon budget for 1.5C. The richest 1% drove twice as much as the poorest 50% combined...
From 1990-2015, annual emissions grew 60%. The richest 5% of people drove over a third of this total growth. When we plot share of total emissions growth by ventiles of the world population, the curve looks like a dinosaur. Emissions barely grew among the poorest 50%...
Read 10 tweets
18 Feb
What can we learn from the 'global land rush' about the risks of large-scale land-based carbon removal in climate mitigation strategies?

A 🧵to put the numbers - like #Shell's reference to needing a new 700Mha forest - into some context
700Mha sounds a lot, & it is.

From 2000-2016 - during the 'global land rush' - @Land_Matrix documented contracted large-scale land deals covering c. 25Mha

That period tells us a lot about the risks of large-scale reliance on land for carbon removals
It was driven by financial #speculation, #biofuels policies and weak land tenure #rights, & has been associated with widespread dispossession, increasing land #inequality & #hunger

No surprise biofuels crops - palm oil, jatropha, sugar cane - accounted for the biggest land area
Read 12 tweets
8 Dec 20
Our latest report - 'Confronting Carbon Inequality in the EU: Why the European Green Deal must tackle inequality while cutting emissions' is here: oxfam.org/en/research/co… It builds on our earlier work with @SEIclimate using the same dataset. Here's a thread with the key findings
The EU as a whole was responsible for 15% of global cumulative consumption emissions 1990-2015, but the responsibility was not equally shared among EU citizens. Richest 10% = over 1/4 of the total = about the same as the poorest 50% of Europeans combined
EU consumption emissions fell c. 12% 1990-2015, but these cuts weren't equally shared among EU citizens. Emissions of poorest 50% fell 24%, those on middle incomes fell by 13%, while those of richest 10% actually INCREASED by 3% (and of richest 1% by 5%).
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(