An informative/explanatory thread on the situation on the border between #Poland and #Belarus and how #Turkey got entangled in the situation. I feel the need to write this cause I can see that many of my Turkish and Western friends find the situation
difficult to understand, even bizzare, and it's normal that it is on us, the Poles, to explain.

Ok, let me start with the basics. We have a really specific migrant crisis on our border with Belarus. Why is it so unique? Because it is a mixture of two trends. Firstly, we have a
"natural" migration where people want to migrate from the ME & Africa due to various push factors (conflicts, famine, climate etc.). Secondly, we have Belarusian dictator, Lukashenka, who decided to make use of this trend and of people willing to migrate to realise his
political goals. Thus the Belarusian regime lifted visas and did everything it could (you can see more in this documentary by @outrid3rs ) to attract as many migrants as he could to Belarus and then push them, often with force, in the direction of thePolish
border. This is why European politicians say that Lukashenka is weaponising migrants and in this sense the crisis is "staged" by him. Had it not been for him, this migration road would not be existent.

What are his political goals? There are many, I will list just two: he
wants to get EU's sanctions lifted and he wants the EU to pay him for keeping the migrants in Belarus (and if you want to know more on Belarus & Russia policy, you should follow our fabulous experts, such as @Anna_M_Dyner, @ALegucka, @W_Kononczuk or @MarekMenkiszak).
For us, it is important to know that because of Lukashenka's stance - again, because he decided to make use of people's misery to accomplish his political goals - the European countries decided that the only possible response is to defend the borders and increase him the cost
of his aggression. It may sound tricky and it seems inhumane, cause the migrants are the victims of this political game, but apparently the EU decided that it is the only rational way not only to stop this crisis, but also to stop other dictators that would like to follow
Lukashenka's steps from making use of people's misery to achieve political goals.

Ok, now we know this, it's time to ask: how and why the hell did Turkey become seen by the Europeans as a part of the problem?

The problem is that since the crisis began, in July, the number of
flights from Istanbul to Minsk increased significantly - from 7 to 28 per week. Istanbul became important hub for migrants traveling to Belarus and Turkish Airlies flew a lot of them to Minsk. Yes, they had visas and documentary provided by the Belarusian regime,
sometimes they even received them in Belarusian consulates in Turkey, not in their countries of origin. This problem has been raised during discussions between officials, and during joint conference between Polish and Turkish foreign ministers in October Mr. Çavuşoglu signaled
his awareness of the problem, even giving numbers of people who went to Belarus & returned on TA flights.

And then Turkey did nothing to stop this. I don't know the reason of this inaction, but I want to say it clearly: it might not have been deliberate, it might have been a
result of many reasons: bad signaling, different perspective (obviously in Turkey's eyes, a country that produly hosts 4 mln refugees, this is barely a crisis), legal doubts. Whatever it was, the situation on the border changed tremendously during the last few days. The migrants
have been organised in huge columns, some of them trained by the Belarusian officers how to destroy border infrastructure and then they were made to do this. It was an important escalation (it was against the Geneva Convention) and as such it gave the EU more ammo and less legal
doubts to claim that what Lukashenka does may be seen as human trafficking and third countries airlines, among them TA, may be sanctioned for participation in this (please, remember this is just my analytical reading of the events). Hence, the pressure on Turkey & TA increased
dramatically and Turkey's room for maneuver decreased significantly.

Turkey finally decided to help it's Euroepan partners and we are thankful for this, as it may help us calm down the situation a little bit. Could Turkey have helped earlier? I am not a lawyer, so I do not want
to say anything for sure, but I think there is no coincidence that huge European mobilisation occurred especially after the latest events, as they were serious enough to leave legally dubious area.

The situation is far from being resolved. The EU's gamble with Lukashenka is
also very risky and, unfortunately, very painful especially to people on the border. Yet, I believe that should we stay united, we will finally sort this out.

Sorry for any typos & simplifications. I am sure that had I make any mistake, especially in my description of events on
the border or Belarusian regime's policy, I would be corrected by my colleagues such as @Anna_M_Dyner or @W_Kononczuk. After all, our job is to provide accurate info, contrary to the authoritarian regimes, which constantly spread disinformation to destabilise European societies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karol Wasilewski

Karol Wasilewski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kwasylewsky

12 Nov
Turkey had no reasons to involve itself in this, and yet it did. The number of flights from Istanbul to Minsk grew significantly during the crisis from 7 to 28 per week and Istanbul became one of the most important hubs for migrants recruited by the Belarusian regime.
Warsaw was not that quick in accusing Turkey, if you take under consideration the facts that the problem arised in July and that it was raised during meetings between Poland and Turkey's ministers of foreign affairs in October.
Just to clarify: I am not saying that Turkey did this consciously, the situation might have been a product of many reasons (legal doubts, bad signaling, different perception of Turkey, a country which proudly hosts 4 mln refugees). Thus I do not support accusations towards Turkey
Read 6 tweets
9 Nov
It will be really hard to build a strong relationship between #Poland and #Turkey, if the latter chooses to stay indifferent to the events on Polish-Belarusian border.

While there may be a genuine will to enhance partnership on the side of decision-makers, the rationale for
this may be harder and harder to explain to the public. Looking at Twitter (yup, I know this is not the best survey company), I can see two patterns of reaction (and here I am not speaking of anonymous accounts which are likely trolls): first is a growing outrage that our treaty
ally seems to be doing nothing to stop the migrants flow by limiting the number of flights from Istanbul to Minsk, second is along the lines of "ha, I told you that this is not a reliable partner".

Moreover, more and more Polish politicians seem to be suggesting that third
Read 13 tweets
22 Sep
Tayyip Erdoğan przyjechał do USA, aby wystąpić przed ZO ONZ (i rozdać swoją nową książkę "Bardziej sprawiedliwy świat jest możliwy"). To dobry moment, żeby przyjrzeć się stosunkom #Turcja i #USA. Co w nich nowego? Czy Stany Zjednoczone nadal traktują Turcję jako "tak zwanego
partnera strategicznego", jak jeszcze niedawno mówił o Turcji sekretarz Blinken? Co zmiany w stosunkach turecko-amerykańskich mówią nam o nowej administracji USA? Co wynika z tego dla #NATO i #Polska?

Długi wstęp, czyli będzie długa nitka 👇
W czerwcu doszło do spotkania na szczycie - prezydent Biden rozmawiał z Erdoğanem. Mało było retoryki z czasów kampanii, gdy Biden nazywał Erdoğana autokratą, sekretarz Blinken też jakoś zamilkł ze swoją krytyką Turcji. Wszystko dlatego, że USA miały do Turcji nie byle jaki
Read 26 tweets
15 Jun
Kilka obserwacji dotyczących obecności Tayyipa Erdoğana na szczycie NATO i szerzej - polityki zagranicznej Turcji 👇
1. Szczyt w Brukseli był ukoronowaniem "ofensywy uroku" Tayyipa Erdoğana, która trwa mniej więcej od wygranej Joe Bidena w wyborach prezydenckich. Erdoğan robił wszystko, aby być na jak największej liczbie zdjęć i spotkać się ze wszystkimi zawodnikami wagi ciężkiej (USA, UK,
Niemcy, Francja), aby pokazać, że sam wciąż należy do najwyższej kategorii wagowej. To ważne obrazy w kontekście izolacji dyplomatycznej, w jaką Turcja wpędziła się swą katastrofalną polityką zagraniczną w ostatnich latach.
Read 25 tweets
25 Apr
Kilka szybkich wniosków na temat wczorajszego oświadczenia prezydenta Joe Bidena, w którym nazwał rzeź Ormian ludobójstwem, i tego, co mówi nam ono o stosunkach turecko-amerykańskich. Zachęcam do lektury nitki 👇
1. Zacznijmy od sprawy podstawowej: to nie jest oświadczenie skierowane do Turcji. To dokument, który ma p. wszystkim upamiętnić tragedię Ormian i zrobić to w sposób, w jaki Amerykanie uważają to za słuszne. Nie jest to zatem pałka, którą Amerykanie chcieli uderzyć w Turcję, czy
ukarać ją za wszystkie problemy, jakie Turcja rodziła dla Stanów Zjednoczonych w ostatnich latach.

Co o tym świadczy? Zachęcam do dokładnej lektury oświadczenia:
whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…

Zostało ono napisane w bardzo przemyślany sposób, aby dać Turkom szansę ("dawanie szansy"
Read 21 tweets
24 Apr
Stało się. Prezydent Joe Biden nazywa rzeź Ormian ludobójstwem jako pierwszy prezydent USA od czasów Ronalda Regana.
Bardzo szybka reakcja tureckiego ministra spraw zagranicznych:

Trzeba przyznać, że dość wyważona, zwłaszcza gdy uwzględni się to, co dziś pojawiało się w turecikm intentecie, również ze strony przedstawicieli państwa.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(