It will be really hard to build a strong relationship between #Poland and #Turkey, if the latter chooses to stay indifferent to the events on Polish-Belarusian border.
While there may be a genuine will to enhance partnership on the side of decision-makers, the rationale for
this may be harder and harder to explain to the public. Looking at Twitter (yup, I know this is not the best survey company), I can see two patterns of reaction (and here I am not speaking of anonymous accounts which are likely trolls): first is a growing outrage that our treaty
ally seems to be doing nothing to stop the migrants flow by limiting the number of flights from Istanbul to Minsk, second is along the lines of "ha, I told you that this is not a reliable partner".
Moreover, more and more Polish politicians seem to be suggesting that third
countries airlines, that means also Turkish Airlines, should be sanctioned for contributing to the misery on our border. I have no doubts that if that happens, Turkey will take note of this, which will also impact the bilateral relationship, even though this will be 🇪🇺 decision
Let's now move away from speculations back to the analytical front: no matter what the public opinion feels/says, there will be a lesson learned for Polish foreign policy. And since this is the biggest crisis on the Polish border since the 1989, the lesson may be well
remembered, basically speaking, it may impact Poland's strategic culture. When it comes to short-term perspective, the lesson may be that being proactive towards Turkey is not enough to assure that the country will be more respectful towards Poland's security interests. Mind you
that making Turkey more willing to recognise Poland's security interests was basically the main goal of Polish foreign policy towards 🇹🇷 in the last two+ years. When it comes to longer-term perspective, the lesson may be that the only way to have an influence on Turkey is through
the EU, which may mean that Poland will be another country instrumentalising its support for the EU-Turkey cooperation for its own good. This does not bode well for the future of Polish-Turkish relations, since up to now every Polish government has unconditionally supported
Turkey's EU bid or - more recently- the modernisation of the Customs Union.
There is still time to limit the impact of events on Polish-Belarusian border on the relationship between Poland and Turkey. Yet, it requires decisive actions on Turkey's side. The Turks may think that
the drone sale or sending F-16 to Malbork was enough to support Poland in this tough situation. Unfortunately, it wasn't. Sorry for being a bit repetitive, but I really want this to resonate - this is the biggest security crisis in Poland's recent history. If our allies want to
be seen as supportive, they can only assure this by going all in for Poland.
I really hope this is what happens in the near future and that thanks to this Poland and Turkey will have another great story to support their relationship which - who knows - may one day even replace
a really great but a little bit hackneyed story about an ambassador from Lechistan.
Polish Prime Minister @MorawieckiM today: "We can see fully synchronised actions - Turkey's actions with Belarus and Russia. We are worried, we do not like this. Unfortunately, our help to Turkey turned out to be one-sided favour":
Tayyip Erdoğan przyjechał do USA, aby wystąpić przed ZO ONZ (i rozdać swoją nową książkę "Bardziej sprawiedliwy świat jest możliwy"). To dobry moment, żeby przyjrzeć się stosunkom #Turcja i #USA. Co w nich nowego? Czy Stany Zjednoczone nadal traktują Turcję jako "tak zwanego
partnera strategicznego", jak jeszcze niedawno mówił o Turcji sekretarz Blinken? Co zmiany w stosunkach turecko-amerykańskich mówią nam o nowej administracji USA? Co wynika z tego dla #NATO i #Polska?
Długi wstęp, czyli będzie długa nitka 👇
W czerwcu doszło do spotkania na szczycie - prezydent Biden rozmawiał z Erdoğanem. Mało było retoryki z czasów kampanii, gdy Biden nazywał Erdoğana autokratą, sekretarz Blinken też jakoś zamilkł ze swoją krytyką Turcji. Wszystko dlatego, że USA miały do Turcji nie byle jaki
Kilka obserwacji dotyczących obecności Tayyipa Erdoğana na szczycie NATO i szerzej - polityki zagranicznej Turcji 👇
1. Szczyt w Brukseli był ukoronowaniem "ofensywy uroku" Tayyipa Erdoğana, która trwa mniej więcej od wygranej Joe Bidena w wyborach prezydenckich. Erdoğan robił wszystko, aby być na jak największej liczbie zdjęć i spotkać się ze wszystkimi zawodnikami wagi ciężkiej (USA, UK,
Niemcy, Francja), aby pokazać, że sam wciąż należy do najwyższej kategorii wagowej. To ważne obrazy w kontekście izolacji dyplomatycznej, w jaką Turcja wpędziła się swą katastrofalną polityką zagraniczną w ostatnich latach.
Kilka szybkich wniosków na temat wczorajszego oświadczenia prezydenta Joe Bidena, w którym nazwał rzeź Ormian ludobójstwem, i tego, co mówi nam ono o stosunkach turecko-amerykańskich. Zachęcam do lektury nitki 👇
1. Zacznijmy od sprawy podstawowej: to nie jest oświadczenie skierowane do Turcji. To dokument, który ma p. wszystkim upamiętnić tragedię Ormian i zrobić to w sposób, w jaki Amerykanie uważają to za słuszne. Nie jest to zatem pałka, którą Amerykanie chcieli uderzyć w Turcję, czy
ukarać ją za wszystkie problemy, jakie Turcja rodziła dla Stanów Zjednoczonych w ostatnich latach.
Trzeba przyznać, że dość wyważona, zwłaszcza gdy uwzględni się to, co dziś pojawiało się w turecikm intentecie, również ze strony przedstawicieli państwa.
Ok, while everybody is talking about #China, #Russia or #Cuba in the context of #coronadiplomacy, let's take a closer look at #Turkey. Who received Turkey's help? What did it consist of? Thread.
So it seems, naturally, that China was the first one to receive Turkish help in February. It consisted of: medicines, medical mascs, googles and gloves. Also in February 🇹🇷 evacuated from 🇨🇳 - in addition to the Turks - citizens of 🇦🇿, 🇦🇱 and 🇬🇪.
Then, in the first half of March, 🇹🇷 sent help to Bulgaria. According to @DailySabah 🇧🇬 "bought 50,000 masks, 100,000 protective garments and 100,000 safety goggles from Turkey". According to @anadoluajansi, 🇹🇷, together with Turkic Council countries, sent aid also to Hungary.
Trump's approach towards the Syrian Kurds raised many controversies and started "wow, what does it mean for us" discussions in allied countries based on analogies between them and SDF or YPG. There are some misperceptions that I think demand explanation.
The U.S. since the beginning claimed they eventually wanted to withdraw from Syria and clearly communicated their partnership with the YPG or SDF is temporarily and tactical. Moreover, Trump's decision on Sunday was third attempt to withdraw from Syria. Bearing this in
mind, these talks about "Trump's betrayal of Kurds" seems missed and are just a replication of Kurds' narrative. Let's move on. The U.S. cooperated with the SDF, and its leading component is made of YPG tied to the PKK, which is recognized as a terrorist organization by