Originally, Keywords were THE thing.
Meta Keywords and string matching.
Other SEs came along, things evolved, Meta-Keywords basically died.
Yet the term remained.
Though how they are used has evolved,
the way they are used for research hasn’t really.
3/*
As competition for “keywords” got harder,
new terms came to the fore:
* Head term
* Longtail
* And then Mid-tail joined in
As more businesses went online, and more sites, pages and content appeared - it became harder to rank for the shorter “keywords”.
4/*
Which brings us “up to date”.
Which, in my opinion - is still limited, sucky and ineffective!
But, before we go further,
let’s make sure everyone is reading off the same page,
and understands “where we are now” :D
(Note the measurements in the pictures!)
5/*
Based on data from @Moz (rounded off),
* Head terms = 20%
* Mid terms = 10%
* Longtail terms = 70%
Head terms are often the most costly, competed, with the greatest volume of matches and ambiguity.
Longtail are the most specific and greater converting
6/*
Head terms.
Primary terms tend to be 1 or 2 words,
often Nouns or Verbs.
These may be ambiguous, and have “mixed SERPs”.
Includes many Navigational/Brand queries,
and may also cover certain Entity Informational queries
Shoes, Pizza, Running, Twitter etc.
7/*
Primary with Secondary terms tend to be 2 to 5 words,
Nouns/Verbs with Prepositions
or Nouns/Verbs with Adjectives/Adverbs.
Often more Informational and/or Commercial
queries, with less ambiguity (fewer mixed SERPs).
Shoe shops near me, Best LED TV etc.
8/*
Primary, Secondary and Tertiary terms tend to be 4+
words, Nouns & Verbs, Prepositions &
Adjectives/Adverbs (even full sentences).
Many Informational and some Commercial intent queries are of this type.
Why are Oxford shoes called Oxfords?
9/*
The longer the term you target,
the more distinctive, specific and unambiguous it is,
the fewer pages you should need to produce to be relevant for it,
and less internal/inbound links.
10/*
The shorter, less detailed the term you want to rank for, the more pages you will need,
with more internal links and inbound links pointing to it.
(Head/Hub pages)
11/*
Each page is meant to target a main term, or set of terms (see "group")
If you produce “topic expanding” content,
you will naturally have pages that include the same “root” term.
(Not really cannibalising!)
12/*
Each page is meant to target a specific thing.
This can be by Variant, Target or Intent.
Variants differentiate by features.
Targets differentiate by audience attributes.
Intents by nature/purpose.
13/*
Consider the following queries:
* get ink out
* get pen ink out
* how to get pen ink out
* how to get pen ink out of shirt
* how to get red pen ink out of a shirt
Are the SERPs different for each?
(Note really!)
14/*
As you can see, the number of words may change - the nature and topic do not.
The order of results may shuffle, but the majority of results are the same pages.
Note the SERP changes, which version triggers ads and where ... and the Featured Snippets.
15/*
Also notice that we didn’t really need “how to” in the query?
We can imply it by removing it - quite safely, as there’s very little chance for ambiguity.
(There isn’t a lot of content about “why to remove ink” etc. :D)
Shows how/why researching competition is important!
16/*
Ambiguous Queries may mean mixed-intent SERPs
(so you may see Commercial and Informational etc.)
Targeting longer queries may mean lower volumes,
but also means less competition,
including advertisers!
17/*
Query: womens eco friendly red clutch handbag london
Keyword : handbag
Keyword phrase : clutch handbag
Target terms : Women(s) and London
Variants : eco friendly and red
Intent : Implied (product, so it’s primarily commercial)
18/*
[Womens eco friendly red clutch handbag london]
This could be shifted from implied-commercial,
towards informational (com+info),
by including “which” or “best”
Or the results could be refined by adding Season, Brand, Material, Size, differentiators (sequins?) etc.
19/*
Next up is "nature" (classification).
We know that Google classifies queries.
We don’t know if that includes types/specifics of Intent,
but we do know it covers Adult and YMYL!
Certain words/phrases will trigger different behaviour (poss. inc. anti-spam algos)
20/*
Then we have “groups”.
Some words have abbreviations and/or variant spellings etc.
There’s also synonyms, similar terms and descriptors.
So any “keyword” may actually cover a range of variant phrases.
(And a page may show for several "phrases", and their variants!)
21/*
[womens eco friendly red clutch handbag london]
eco friendly ?= sustainable | recycled | green
red ?= ‘’ | scarlet | burgundy | strawberry
22/*
There’s more to keywords!
Keywords are a bridge -
between the User and the Search Engine!
You need to understand Nature, Intent, Parts of Speech, and how they pertain to Journey Stage, SERP Features etc.
You need to see ways to utilise that information in your content
23/*
Change your research, the docs and reports you make.
Do NOT just include Term, Volume & CPC!
Include:
Primary term(s)
Term group
Intent of each term
Intent triggers (or if implied)
Journey stage
Synonymous words/phrases
Terms that make a difference (or not)
Terms to avoid
24/*
You will find SEO life gets much (much!) easier when you capture/attach the additional information.
From prioritising targets through to ideation, identifying internal link targets etc.
So, give it a go…
Go Beyond “Keywords”.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
+ When looking at TLDs for Domain Names, check for confusion points (same name, different TLD etc.)
>>>
>>>
+ Sort the HTTP > HTTPS out, and pick either www or non-www - then get the 301s sorted out from day one.
+ Own your Name! Make sure you own a domain with your Brand, and you have social profiles for it (same for unique product names etc.).
Same for Directories.
Definition:
Internal links are links between your own pages,
within the same “site”,
(this may be the same subdomain, or across subdomains, depending on structure/organisation).
>>>
3/*
:: Features ::
Links often consist of:
* Location
* Content
* Attributes
Location:
The location may be a URL (different page),
a Fragment (specific point in the current page, or specific text (Fragment Directive)),
or both URL+Fragment (a part/text on a different page).
Heads up, Thread about Internal Links incoming,
(Which I'm grateful for the 3% lead, as I've half written it already :) (and my eldest tried to spike it towards Keywords, knowing I've not touched that topic yet- sod!))
24 tweets in ...
... maybe I should split it?
:D
Erm - apparently, I have to stop there!
Did you know ...
Twitter has a 24 tweets in series limit?
(Did anyone?)
I can add more tweets once I've posted the rest!
So I think I may split it into 2 threads,
(as reading through 20+ tweets has to be painful for most people)
For many businesses, it is typically cheaper, faster and easier to keep existing consumers/clients than to try to win them back.
(Subsequently, it's cheaper to win them back than get new)
Far to often though, you will see businesses get this wrong.
And not just SMBs, but look at Banks, TV Service providers etc.
They will offer all sorts of deals to get new consumers,
but don't offer the same/similar value to reward existing ones.
(threaten to leave ;))
>>>
>>>
The typical mindset is existing clients/customers are "banked money" - they own you, you're a safe couple of quid, you don't need nurturing etc. (your money is theirs, already!)
So their efforts go on Clawbacks (recently left) and Acquisitions (inc. Poaching!).
The majority (but not all!) come from "marketing",
rather than "digital marketing".
And, in many cases, it seems more aimed at things like DigitalAds or SMM, often looking at Last Click etc.
But, why are people saying it;
esp. if they are from "real" marketing?
>>>
3/*
Now, for most of us - the statement is actually true (-ish).
Few of us get to work with hard-attribution (physical tickets etc.).
That means most of us deal with incomplete data,
often with inaccuracies.
But that in no way makes attribution BS or useless!