... her toaster wouldn’t accept her bread. She held the slice in front of it and waited for the screen to show her a thumbs-up emoji, but instead, it showed her the head-scratching face and made a soft brrt. She waved the bread again. Brrt.
“Come on.” Brrt.
[...]
There was a touchscreen option on the toaster to call support, but that wasn’t working, so she used the fridge to look up the number and call it. It rang seventeen times and disconnected. She heaved a sigh. Another one bites the dust. ...
The toaster wasn’t the first appliance to go (that honor went to the dishwasher, which stopped being able to validate third-party dishes the week before ...), but it was the last straw. She could wash dishes in the sink but ... was she supposed to make toast over a candle?
...
Just to be sure, she asked the fridge for headlines about [the manufacturer], and there it was, their cloud had burst in the night. Socials crawling with people furious about their daily bread.
[mildly edited to fit char limit on Twitter]
I recommend the book, Radicalized.
More excerpts here: arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01…
Perhaps one moral of the story is that not everything should be internet-connected, or require a central power to authorize its use.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The #BTC 200D MA (200-day moving average of price) is an important level for understanding #Bitcoin.
I think the $BTC 2Y MA and its 5x multiple are more valuable long-term, but mid-term the 200MA is worth paying attention to.
Here's my perspective 👇[THREAD]👇
From #Bitcoin's introduction in 2009 until its first halving, $BTC stayed above the 200D MA period until its first bear market period. The 200D MA served as resistance, but breaking above it led to prices higher than the 200D MA breakdown the previous year, signaling new 🆙trend
In the next #Bitcoin era, the first after the halving at the end of 2012, $BTC rose rapidly and parabolically, blowing off early and testing the 200D MA for support to continue the bull run. (cont)
Not too long ago, people said that another blow-off top was inevitable for Bitcoin.
Then, people said that because so many people believed it, it was unlikely to happen.
Now, fewer and fewer people believe in a blow-off top.
Based on above logic, this makes a blow-off more likely
@TechDev_52 -- in ref to some comments back and forth we've had lately
Reading some of the responses to this ... Logic might be hard for some of you. Studying it would be valuable for your life. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoic_log…
"lengthening cycles" is a contradiction in terms.
If the peak takes longer to occur then in previous cycles, that does not mean that the cycle is longer.
Just as if the last snow of winter occurs later in the year, that does not make the year longer!
Some people would have you believe that "The first cycle was from 2009 to 2011" (3 years) and "The second cycle was from 2011 to 2013" (4 years) and "The fourth cycle was from 2013 to 2017" (5 years) and therefore this cycle should be longer.
These people are bastardizing the word cycle and they should remove it from their mouth.