🧵
::: That's "Real Intent" :::

The article by @LogansNotions is more than worth a read (well written and informative).

But it does raise a point that is beginning to irk me.

"INTENT" is not just a buzz word!

#SEO #intentalosopita

🧵>>>
>>>

I don't think people realise just how long/established the idea of "searcher intent" (or "query intent") is.
We've had several cycles of it over the past decade,
and it's older than that!

More importantly, it's a core aspect of Marketing/Sales.

>>>
>>>

Intent isn't just:
* purpose
* goal

It includes:
* reason
* motivation

Someone may be searching for Pizza.
That may trigger Local, as well as a possible hybrid of Commercial/Informational.

But they are searching for Pizza for a reason (hungry. to bake later etc.).

>>>
>>>

This is why research and analysis are important.
It's not just "keywords".
It's not just "modifiers" or "complimentors".

It's physical, mental and emotional needs/wants - drivers.

>>>
>>>

The words you target carry some info - but it may vary.

"Handbags" = noun > product
... so commercial/transactional

"Best" = modifier > comparison/advisory
... so shifts towards information/comparative (likely hybrid with C/T).

>>>
>>>

But the SERP content can improve your accuracy.

1) The results can inform you what G thinks/sees users are after
2) The features (ads, FS, PAA, KP etc.) can show what people/G think you want too

Between "word" and "SERP" you can get a good picture ...

>>>
>>>

... of what is already there.

Sometimes, that's sufficient.
But if you stop there - you aren't doing it properly!

You need to adjust/expand the query; look at additional phrasings, look at deeper motivations.

>>>
>>>

This not only helps you with discovering,
but with comprehension.

Every single piece of content (page, image, video etc.),
should contribute towards a business goal,
and a user-goal.

There's a wealth of established stages (funnel/journey), and pain points/motivators!

>>>
>>>

Awareness > Interest > Decision > Conversion

or

Awareness > Education > Interest > Consideration > Comparison > Rationalisation > Conversion

and then

Cultural, Social, Personal, Psychological

or

Status, Fear, Comfort, Safety, Satisfaction, Advantage

etc.

>>>
>>>

So when you do your research - you should be looking at whatever model/list seems to suit your market/business/prospects (or audience).

You should be considering content (and researching!) for each stage, and motivation.

If you're not, you are likely missing out!

>>>
>>>

This is why knowing your audience is so important.

It's not just:
* what words are they searching

but also:
* why are they searching
* what do they want to find

and then (ideally):
* what format/medium suits them
* what language/level

>>>
>>>

If it helps, think of times when You are the prospect.
You have likely searched for something on line ...
... and likely got frustrated/irritated with the results.

You've had to alter the query,
or click multiple items in the SERPs.

Why?

>>>
>>>

Because the words you originally used weren't specific enough?
Because the content you found was weak/lame?
Because the problem the content addresses didn't quite match your problem?
Because the content was insufficient/covered different aspects?

>>>
>>>

Be considerate of the user,
think from their perspective,
understand their need.

It's not just "words"!

There are "feelings" and "thoughts" you have to address!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lyndon NA (Darth Autocrat)

Lyndon NA (Darth Autocrat) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @darth_na

10 Jan
.
::: Generalist, Specialist, Stupidest... :::

I keep seeing these things pop-up,
so I thought I'd try to encourage a little thought,
discussion and hopefully improve how this topic tends to be presented.

🧵>>>

#SEO #Marketing #Skills Image. 3 separate images made of blocks/squares. a) A horizo
Generalist vs Specialist.

The typical view:
* Generalists cover multiple subjects (or sub-subjects/aspects) - they have "breadth".
* Specialists have great depth of a singular aspect.

>>> Image: Two images - Generalist and Specialist.  a) Depiction
But people have realised that's not quite right!
So we end up with the "T" - both Breadth and Depth!

Wait ... it gest better!

>>> Image: Titled : "But there's more!" A "T"
Read 12 tweets
7 Jan
@si1very Yes/No/Maybe?

The distinction is important, because a penalty is an applied negative.
Getting hit with a penalty for things like mass-cookie-cutter or stolen content is vastly different to G filtering out X of Y pages.

>>>
@si1very >>>

Then there's the issues of vocabulary/ & specificity.
* Internal duplication
* External duplication
* Copied/Stolen content
* Highly similar content
* Cookie-cutter-content
* Boilerplate content
* Low "original" content
* Mashups
* Enhanced mashups

Each is different.

>>>
@si1very >>>

If you've got 50+ pages, and have some canonical issues (such as protocol, domain/TLD, paths/queries etc.) - it's problematic.

1) Diluted and/or Dispersed values typically lead to lower rankings.
2) Auto-canonical/Filter may lead to fluctuating rankings

>>>
Read 15 tweets
19 Nov 21
1/🧵
🚨::: Online Reputation Management :::🚨

A topic that is often ignored,
despite the huge influence that reputation plays in marketing,
the impact it has on sales,
and what a PITA it is for SEO.

🧵>>>

Please Retweet

#ORM #OnlineReputationManagement #SEO #DarthAutocrat Image : Header text reads &...
2/*

ORM is technically part of Digital Public Relations (Digital PR (DPR)).

I say “technically”, because, in most cases, those in that field seem more interested in “link acquisition” than handling public relations/perception?

>>>
3/*

Online Reputation is obviously the digital/internet aspect of a company’s (or individuals/groups) reputation.

It not only has the same issues that the Real World presents,
but has some unique difficulties due to the nature of digital, and search.
Read 45 tweets
14 Nov 21
If you've done the research,
you should have a set of
Who, What, Where, When & Why

Those should make a large % of the existing consumers.

But few people go to the effort of:
1) Figuring an earlier "when", and the "where" that goes with it
2) Looking at sibling/cousin paths
Proper (and continuous!) research should yield insights into motivation/cause, and locations.
You should be able to utilise "personas" (or demo-/firmo- and psycho-graphics) to locate additional locations, probable channels/sources.

Failing that, use Search for questions!
Search for the same things your consumers do,
and you'll likely find where they go for info ... and where you should be!
(providing answers, running ads, providing sponsorships etc.)

Do searches for Product/Service -brand, and see what comes up. Or +Comp. brand!
Read 6 tweets
12 Nov 21
1/🧵
🚨::: Keywords, and Beyond! :::🚨

It’s a standard industry term.
Almost everyone that has heard of SEO knows of “keywords”.

The problem is, the general perception of keywords is out of date!

Worse - there’s no alternative, and few additional terms!

#SEO #DarthAutocrat Image : Heading : “Keywords, and Beyond!” Darth Vader in
2/*

Originally, Keywords were THE thing.
Meta Keywords and string matching.

Other SEs came along, things evolved, Meta-Keywords basically died.

Yet the term remained.
Though how they are used has evolved,
the way they are used for research hasn’t really.
3/*

As competition for “keywords” got harder,
new terms came to the fore:
* Head term
* Longtail
* And then Mid-tail joined in
As more businesses went online, and more sites, pages and content appeared - it became harder to rank for the shorter “keywords”.
Read 24 tweets
10 Nov 21
.
8 things to think about - SEO for Startups.

Solid thinking and reasoning on SEO for new businesses.

More than worth a read!

#SEO #StartUps
>>>
>>>

I'd also throw in:

+ Get TSL sorted and have the HTTPS on launch!

+ Get your Google Business listing sorted ASAP

+ When looking at TLDs for Domain Names, check for confusion points (same name, different TLD etc.)

>>>
>>>

+ Sort the HTTP > HTTPS out, and pick either www or non-www - then get the 301s sorted out from day one.

+ Own your Name! Make sure you own a domain with your Brand, and you have social profiles for it (same for unique product names etc.).
Same for Directories.

>>>
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(