Oops they’re doing it again. Republican members of Congress want to be seen as voting in lockstep with their party but they also want credit when the legislation crafted & passed by #Democrats pay huge dividends for their constituents. #WeSeeYou👀 1/20 #DemocratsDeliver
This article, from Jan. 20, 2022 By Steve Benen tells the story of the double-dealing, mealy-mouthed, two-faced, weaselly, yellow-bellied, two-timing, lying Republican swine. The article doesn’t use those words but draw your own conclusions. 2/20 msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/ncna…
“Around this time 12 years ago, as investments from Barack Obama's Recovery Act started reaching communities nationwide, Republicans who opposed the economic package started showing up at ribbon-cutting ceremonies.”3/20 #RepublicanHypocrisy
“If it were up to these GOP lawmakers, the funding for these projects wouldn't have existed, but they hoped voters would overlook such pesky details.”4/20 #DemocratsDeliver
“Last year, it happened again. After President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan into law, many of the Republicans who railed against the Democrats' Covid-relief sought credit for the benefits they tried to kill.” 5/20 #WeSeeYou👀
“This year, the GOP is taking steps to complete the trifecta, claiming credit for the infrastructure package that Biden signed after the majority of congressional Republicans rejected the legislation.” 6/20 #WeSeeYou👀
“The first example of this came to light shortly before Thanksgiving, when Republican Rep. Gary Palmer of Alabama touted funding in the infrastructure package that will benefit his constituents, without noting that he voted against the bill.” 7/20 #WeSeeYou👀
“With money starting to flow in for new projects around the country thanks to the bipartisan infrastructure law Congress approved last year, more Republicans are attempting to take credit despite the fact that they opposed the legislation.”8/20 #Infrastructurebill#BidenBoom
“Rep. Ashley Hinson (R) touted "game-changing" funding of $829 million announced by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that is aimed toward modernizing locks and dams on the Mississippi River, which borders her Eastern Iowa district.”9/20 #WeSeeYou👀
“In a tweet yesterday, the Iowa Republican boasted that "we" had secured dam funding in her district. It led to an obvious follow-up question for Hinson: "What do you mean, 'we'?"10/20 #WeSeeYou👀 #DemocratsDeliver
“When it came time to vote up or down on the infrastructure package, Hinson voted with her party against the bill.”11/20 #WeSeeYou👀 #Infrastructurebill#BidenBoom
“The congresswoman soon after issued a written statement, condemning the bipartisan legislation as "a partisan, socialist spending spree." In fact, the Iowan referred to "socialist" or "socialism" in her statement four times.”12/20 #VoteNoTaketheDough
“For good measure, Hinson said the infrastructure package "takes the Marxist ideology that once only existed in textbooks and makes it law in the United States of America."13/20 #VoteThemAllOut2022#RepublicanHypocrisy#RepublicanLies
“Yesterday, however, as this "socialist spending spree" started benefiting her constituents, Hinson issued a new statement, claiming she "helped lead" on this issue. #WeSeeYou👀 14/20 #DemocratsDeliver
“Similarly yesterday, Republican Rep. Kay Granger of Texas touted new funding for the Trinity River Vision/Central City flood control project — funding made possible by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.” 15/20 #RepublicanHypocrisy#TXpol#Infrastructurebill
“What her press release didn't mention is that Granger voted to kill the bill, and condemned the package at the time as a "socialist plan full of crushing taxes and radical spending."16/20 #WeSeeYou👀 #TXpol#RepublicanHypocrisy
It’s not uncommon for lawmakers,esp.when dealing with a massive, multifaceted piece of legislation, to like some elements of a bill while opposing the larger whole (or conversely, oppose some provisions while endorsing the larger whole). That's just part of the process.17/20
“But Hinson, Granger & their colleagues should also be mindful of the context: Republicans condemned the infrastructure bill in no uncertain terms, before launching an offensive against the modest number of GOP lawmakers who dared to make it bipartisan by voting for it.”18/20
“Either the new law is reckless socialism, or it's poised to make worthwhile investments that will help a lot of people. Either Republicans are going to make the case against the package, or they're going to celebrate the parts of it that benefit their constituents.”19/20
“When the GOP tries to do both at the same time — just as the party did with the Recovery Act and the American Rescue Plan — Republicans shouldn't be surprised when they get called out for their brazenness.” 20/20 #WeSeeYou👀 #RepublicanHypocrisy#DemocratsDeliver#BidenBoom
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), originally in the House as the INVEST in America Act (H.R. 3684), is a US federal statute enacted by the 117th United States Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden on November 15, 2021. #DemHistory#WhyIVoteDem
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), provisions:
•110 billion for roads, bridges and other major projects;
•$11 billion in transportation safety programs;
•$39 billion in transit modernization and improved accessibility..#DemHistory#WhyIVoteDem
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA):
•$66 billion in rail;
•$7.5 billion to build a national network of electric vehicle chargers;
•$73 billion in power infrastructure and clean energy transmission and
•$65 billion for broadband development. #DemHistory
The story of the #BuildBackBetter has yet to be written. Let’s examine the 50 Republican US Senators who are voting against lifting children out of poverty, education,elder care, affordable prescription drugs, child care & family leave? What does this mean for YOUR STATE?
#ALABAMA Sen. Richard Shelby is voting against the #ChildTaxCredit “The Center on Budget &Policy Priorities found making the program permanent would benefit 93% of #AL children,lift 162,000 #AL children above/closer to poverty line & benefit 480,000 #AL children under 17.
#ALABAMA Sen. Tommy Tuberville has offered you no solutions; he has admitted that he “wouldn’t have a clue” how to address the current pandemic and recently told people that $600 per week in federal unemployment benefits was just “too much.” al.com/news/2021/12/a…
A landmark court case is a case of legal importance, usually settling a signficant matter, and which decision is used and followed by the judiciary to decide cases dealing with the same issue. Here are 26 important Supreme Court Landmark Decisions over the years.1/28 #SCOTUS
Marbury v Madison: judicial review created; The act and the ensuing last-minute appointment of new judges by outgoingJohn Adams (the so-called “midnight judges”) were decried by the incoming president, Thomas Jefferson. #SCOTUS#BackToSchool#DemsWork4USA
Plessy v Ferguson: “separate but equal”; In the pivotal case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. 3/28 #BackToSchool#SCOTUS#DemsWork4USA
#BackToSchool The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court of our land. The 9 justices decide the constitutionality of our laws and they hear select cases as a court of last appeal. Since Presidents pick nominees, elections & voting matter a great deal!
Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
2/19
Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices & established the lower federal court system.
3/19
#BackToSchool Conservatives like to insist that they revere the U.S. Constitution, though many have very little familiarity with it. There’s many more amendments than just their favorite, #2. 1/ Thread #Constitution#DemsWork4USA
We have 3 Branches of Government: 1. Legislative: makes laws; Article 1 2. Executive: enforces laws; Article 2 3. Judicial: interprets laws; Article 3 2/ #backtoschool#Constitution
When the Constitution was written there were two entrenched factions. Federalists: supported the Constitution; wanted a strong central government,; Madison, Hamilton, and Jay wrote Federalist Papers trying to get the public to support the Constitution. 3/ #backtoschool
#BackToSchool “#Filibuster” is a funny word. It rolls off the tongue surprisingly well for a blocking tactic! Its history is longer than you’d think.
Here’s a look at the filibuster, how it works and the current political firestorm over it. apnews.com/article/donald…
1/20
WHAT’S A FILIBUSTER?
Unlike the House, the Senate places few constraints on lawmakers’ right to speak.
Senators can easily use the chamber’s rules to hinder or block votes. Collectively these procedural delays are called #filibusters. 2/20
Senate records say the term began appearing in the mid-19th century. The word comes from a Dutch term for “freebooter” and the Spanish “filibusteros” that were used to describe pirates. 3/20 #Filibuster#Pirates