Namely, the U.S. is - following @SecBlinken's failure to de-escalate the crisis on Friday with @mfa_russia's Sergey #Lavrov - no longer an acceptable interlocuter in this crisis.
The US (withdrawing embassy staff) and UK (releasing intel) since have arguably made things worse.
@SecBlinken@mfa_russia@FareedZakaria His simple thesis makes a lot of sense, Putin's strategy is to break NATO by driving an economic wedge on Energy between the EU and US. If the EU is forced to sanction Russia and lock off Nordstream 2 - Putin wins.
Monday's @StateDeptSpox@StateDept briefing was extremely long and materially focussed on the issue of "increasing daylight" between the US and EU position on the crisis. Media clearly were not buying the USG spin on this. state.gov/briefings/depa…
@StateDeptSpox@StateDept One area of disagreement is Germany's decision to not supply lethal weaponry to Ukraine for example.
But the withdrawal of embassy staff from Kiev may have been a last straw. This decision certainly made headlines and upset the people and Govt. of Ukraine.
@StateDeptSpox@StateDept On the face of things, the "daylight" between the US and EU has since grown significantly wider. Technically the next step is supposed to be the U.S. providing written responses to the Russians.
I am listening to this briefing now. And it is not clear to me that the U.S. has received the message. The always entertaining @APDiploWriter Matt Lee is asking exactly the right questions.
And on the current trajectory, absent the U.S. pulling in its horns, it's @NATO EU partners may be forced to more clearly tell the U.S. to stop it's escalatory comment.
And - I may be being a bit naive here - but if a widening void within NATO is the result of ongoing U.S./UK sabre rattling, then the outcome for Russia and EU relations is again, exactly what the Russian's are seeking.
This morning's US cable news notices (here @JoeNBC with the Senate Foreign Relations Cmtte chair) indicate that the US has not yet digested the implications last night's developments - and continue to play directly into Putin's hands.
At one point in their exchange @SenatorMenendez suggested that the U.S. might sanction Nordstream 2 by itself. Which seems extremely unwise.
Sen. Menendez also suggested that the U.S. Senate is in favour of pre-emptive sanctions.
None of this will be music in European ears.
Last night, Scholz and Macron talked at length (albeit very mildly) about the needs for more talks with Russia, specifically citing the #OSCE (Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe) and the #NormandyFormat which is associated with the Minsk agreement.
#OSCE was mentioned in both Monday's and yesterday's @StateDept briefings (7 and 8 times respectively), and the #NormandyFormat came up in yesterday's briefing.
It will be very interesting today to see whether the EU position becomes more clearly understood over the course of the day. Right now the U.S. @StateDept at least, appears to be clueless on this.
In answer to questions from @mitchellreports in the briefing @StateDeptSpox claimed that the Europeans is entirely happy with the path of the US's bilateral "Strategic Stability" talks as they have been kept informed all the way through.
While the EU will likely not say this publicly, this entire Ukraine crisis suggests that the "Strategic Stability" talks - a key takeway from the Biden-Putin summit in June - are not working for Russia, and that possibly this arms build-up is a result of that failure.
The 2014 Ukraine Crisis during the Biden Administration was a disaster for Ukraine and the wider world - especially with respect to Climate Change after the U.S. doubled down on energy independence through fracking - indicating how tied up all of this is with energy policy.
If you are interested in this subject, yesterday's State Dept briefing is very interesting. @StateDeptSpox does his best, very professionally, but at this point in time, the U.S. policy position appears increasingly irreconcilable with that of Europe. state.gov/briefings/depa…
CNN has just had @StateDeptSpox Ned Price on, saying that if Russia invades Ukraine, the Russia-Germany Gas pipeline Nordstream 2 (completed - not online - opposed by US) will not proceed.
The remarks were made by @StateDeptSpox in this report from @NPR at 4.25pm US ET (10.25pm last night EU CEST). And in this case - with things moving so fast - the timing may actually be important.
@SecBlinken's briefing and announcement on this came at 12pm US ET (6pm CEST).
While the weakening of the Sahara east west water transport event has led to a weakening in the weird weather over the Arabian Peninsula, it has not stopped.
Most notably we have seen significant snowfall in Israel, Lebanon Jordan & Syria.
And with a major European (Atlantic) tropical rain/snow event now underway the rain and snow activity in the Levant is forecast to continue. Here's yesterday's precipitation forecast for the Southern Levant.
And the Northern Levant.... (both forecasts are through to 4th February.
Here are the latest long range rain forecasts for Southern Africa. All indicate some rain in the area with the GFS and CMC model forecasts showing lesser quantities than the ECMWF and KMA models.
Rainfall so far in the desert area has been fairly minimal but the forecasts show the slow moving low pressure storm currently over Zimbabwe maintaining a significant amount of energy - and moving south west over the desert. [Satellite images Jan 24-27 below]
This looks kind of rushed. The press conference was five hours ago, less than 24 hours after the joint Macron/Scholz presser last night. It was announced by @StateDept but not @StateDeptSpox or @SecBlinken and streamed live on Twitter.