The financial channel of exchange rates operates through the risk capacity of market participants and shows up in the response of financial conditions to exchange rate movements
This new BIS Working Paper shows that the channel operates for stock returns, too
Dollar-denominated returns tend to be an amplified version of the local currency-denominated returns; both the gains and losses are magnified when converted into dollar returns
Hence the "dollar return multiplier"
The dollar return multiplier comes about because stock returns tend to be positive when the local currency is appreciating against the dollar and negative when it's depreciating
This correlation turns out to be a remarkably robust feature of the data
The broad dollar index emerges as a global factor encapsulating the financial channel; it beats the bilateral exchange rate as an explanatory variable; echoing recent burgeoning research on international finance
All this culminates in the "dollar beta", defined as the loading of stock returns on the percentage decline of the broad dollar index
A stock with a high dollar beta is one whose return rises more with a larger broad depreciation of the dollar
In short, the dollar beta is an asset pricing factor, in the spirit of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
For those who want to dig deeper on the underlying economics, this lecture at the LSE in 2016 may be a useful place to start: bis.org/speeches/sp161…
The economics runs through the changing nature of financial intermediation;
Just as the VIX was a good summary measure of the price of balance sheet before the GFC, so the dollar has become a good measure of the price of balance sheet after the GFC
"The mantle of the barometer of risk appetite and leverage has slipped from the VIX, and has passed to the dollar" bis.org/speeches/sp161…
On a personal note, I am delighted that the dollar beta paper will be part of the launch of Oxford Open Economics, the new open journal edited by @upanizza
I wish this exciting venture fair wind in its sails
Supply bottlenecks have grabbed all the headlines recently, but longer-term structural changes brought about by the pandemic (labour markets, especially) are important to understand where we are headed
Two further points to bear in mind are (1) counterparty sector (official or private financial, private non-financial) and (2) the distinction between location and nationality
For this, the following BIS data would shed more light
First, regarding the counterparty sector, the 2020:Q1 surge in cross-border banking flows stands out
Normally, we would expect a sharp retrenchment during stress episodes, but there was instead a surge, as discussed in this #BIS_Bulletin bis.org/publ/bisbull34…
A closer look reveals that most of the flows were the recycling of dollar funding through interoffice flows as part of a "Grand Overdraft"; this explains the surge and the subsequent unwinding
#DeFi, or decentralised finance, is the latest manifestation of this idea where the ledger is much more elaborate than simply keeping score of who pays whom
Bottlenecks started out as disruptions to supply, but they have morphed into something more
Key point to bear in mind: in aggregate at least, supply has caught up to pre-pandemic levels in key sectors like semi-conductors as well as in raw materials and shipping
So, what then is going on?
Two factors are key: (1) shift in composition of demand and (2) the endogenous changes in behaviour that's given rise to bullwhip effects
Decentralization is motivated by the governance benefits - the idea is that the checks and balances of the community as a whole is the best way to safeguard the integrity of the system and avoid capture by a few powerful entities
But there has been an argument that the price to be paid for this better governance is the lack of scalability
Privacy looms large when CBDCs come up, as digital currencies rely on a ledger of some kind - a record of who owns what, when, and who pays what to whom; see this (tough but fair) interview with @izakaminska and @senoj_erialc I gave to @FTAlphaville
The idea of a digital ID-based CBDC causes discomfort (to say the least); it conjures up notions of compulsory national identity cards
See this classic episode of "Yes Minister", for instance