#SupremeCourt to continue hearing batch of Petitions challenging the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act. #PMLA #MoneyLaundering
Senior Advocate Amit Desai appearing for the petitioners continues arguing. Desai referring to the issue of bail in PMLA cases that bail is a facet of Article 21. #PMLA #moneylaundering
Referring to the Judgment in the case of Sanjay Chandra, Desai states that this reaffirms the bail. The arguments are being made in context of the no bail to a person accused under PMLA. #PMLA #moneylaundering
Desai- In these PMLA cases not only the accused people but also their employees and other related persons are also arrested and they also keep sitting in jail for a long period of time. #pmla #moneylaundering
The law on bail is already settled, when your Lordships see an offence punishable with 7 years, the question to consider is that should there be such a rule of restricting the bail to people who have strong roots in the society, Desai added. #pmla #moneylaundering
Should it be the legislature to over right the power of the court or should it be the court that protects the rights of it citizen, Desai added.
Desai- When the legislation fails that is where your Lordships need to come in.
Desai- This 45(2) must fail. Now the 437. In 437 whilst it puts in a bar, the legislature has itself verified, when the sessions court becomes remanding court the limitation is not recognised. #pmla #moneylaundering
Justice Dinesh Maheshwari- You are talking about 7 years, but it affects the economy of the Country, there are so many people who get affected.
Justice CT Ravikumar- It affects the sovereignty and integrity of the Country. #pmla #moneylaundering
Desai- Even in the cases of smuggling and other serious offences affecting the economy, the consideration of the judiciary under 437 has not been taken away. #pmla #moneylaundering
Desai- There are so many people who get caught up in this situation who are not the real beneficiary, they are the employees there families gets affected they keep sitting in jails, it is in these kind of situation where we consider rights under 21. #pmla #moneylaundering
Desai- We are taking away the discretion of the court, these are experienced judges let them assess the situation. It is the balancing that we are urging your Lordships to consider. #pmla #moneylaundering
Desai- If it is a crime syndicate then I would be the first person to say that withdraw everything and deal with it in a way at par with TADA and MACOCA, but here there are smal cheating, breach of trust and other issues.
Desai- Give opportunity to senior judges to asses, it's not as if the system is not working, but it's about enabling the court. #pmla #moneylaundering
Desai- The criminal must work in the context of 21.
J Khanwilkar- Larger public interest doesn't possess 21 rights?
Desai- Offcourse.
J Khanwilkar- You want us not to arrest unless the person is convicted.
Desai referring to the power of arrest, Judgment in the case of Joginder and Arnesh there is a discretion of Arrest. The arrest is an investigative tool to collect evidence. Do not exercise the power of arrest as pre trial detention. #pmla #moneylaundering
Desai- I'm reference to the cases of money laundering, Mens rea is what your Lordships need to take in account. #pmla #moneylaundering
A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will shortly resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. Ravivarma Kumar,Sr.Adv, is expected to resume his arguments today. #HijabRow#HijabControversy
While @Devadattkamat concluded his arguments yesterday. The court pulled up a lawyer appearing for the petitioners for filing an application with his affidavit as opposed to that of his client’s #HijabRow#HijabControversy
BREAKING: 765 persons including lawyers, law students, academicians and social activists express deep concern with the interim order of the Karnataka HC restraining all students from wearing religious clothing and condemn the violation of constitutional rights of muslims.
Open letter states that they “hang their heads in shame” after having been witness to ‘public humiliation of Muslim students and staff, who are being forced to remove their hijab before entering schools and colleges, purportedly on instructions of the district administrations’
Open letter by 765 persons states that HC order restraining students from wearing religious clothing ‘proceeds on an understanding linked exclusively to the right to freedom of conscience, enshrined in Article 25 of the Constitution’ & not on golden triangle of Art 14,19,21 & 15
#SupremeCourt hearing pleas challenging the Madras High Court judgment which had declared the 10.5% internal reservation to the Vanniyar community under the existing 20% reservation to Most Backward Classes by Tamil Nadu Government unconstitutional. #VanniyarReservation
Bench: We are not inclined to the argument of referring the matter to a larger bench, you can start your arguments.
Due to non availability of Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi the petitioner are seeking a short accomodation.
The bench has asked other counsels to continue with their submissions.
[Loudspeaker ban] Gujarat High Court issues notice on a PIL plea seeking a statewide ban on loudspeakers in mosques.
On a plea moved by a doctor who runs his clinic in state's Gandhinagar district, Chief Justice Aravind Kumar led bench issued notice to the Gujarat government.
The doctor had alleged that people who live nearby any mosque are made subject to great inconvenience and disturbance.
The doctor had demanded the practice to be prohibited stating that despite the fact that due to covid protocols, many of the namaz offerees are not reaching mosques for the prayers, the mosques are using loudspeakers during prayers.
Sr. Adv. Ranjit Kumar for petitioner: Your lordships reposed a confidence upon SEC for free and fair election. Unfortunately that has been belied.
For the remaining 108 municipalities, therefore pass appropriate orders.
Kumar: while the whole election process is going on, they wanted to influence voters by taking advantage of door-to-door schemes and the SEC allowed this!
📢Tomorrow - Arguments in the bail plea by counsel for Umar Khalid expected tomorrow in the #DelhiRiots larger conspiracy case(s) before Karkardooma Court. Tune in for live updates. #umarkhalid
Hearing will take place before a bench of ASJ (Additional Sessions Judge) Amitabh Rawat. #umarkhalid#DelhiRiots