1⃣ Statistical analysis shows that the effective reproduction number of BA.2 is 1.4-fold higher than that of BA.1. 2/5
2⃣ Neutralization experiments show that the vaccine-induced humoral immunity fails to function against BA.2 like BA.1, and notably, the antigenicity of BA.2 is different from BA.1. 3/5
3⃣ Infection experiments using hamsters show that BA.2 (note: because clinical isolates of BA.2 have not been obtained yet, we generated a chimeric virus bearing BA.2 S by reverse genetics) is more pathogenic than BA.1. 4/5
▶️ Our multiscale investigations suggest that the risk of BA.2 (a.k.a. "stealth Omicron") for global health is potentially higher than that of BA.1. 5/5
⏩ Viral genome sequences of BA.1 and BA.2 is ~2-fold more different from those of an original Wuhan-Hu-1 and #Delta and #Alpha. We showed the virological features of BA.2 is clearly different from that of BA.1. Should BA.2 be given a letter of the Greek alphabet? 5/5+1
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING🎄 The 6th preprint from G2P-Japan - #Omicron is less infectious and pathogenic than #Delta and even an early pandemic SARS-CoV-2 in infected hamster model. 1/5
How come?
We have recently reported that Delta spike is efficiently cleaved into two subunits, and therefore, Delta is highly fusogenic and highly pathogenic @Nature . 2/5 nature.com/articles/s4158…
In sharp contrast, Omicron is less fusogenic (left panel) and its spike is faintly cleaved (right panel). Our data suggest that the efficacy of spike protein cleavage, fusogenicity and pathogenicity are well correlated each other. 3/5