Final thoughts on tonight's #UNSC meeting on #Ukraine:
(1) Western UNSC members were tough (lots of talk of non-UN sanctions) but holding onto last chance for diplomatic way out. [1/5]
(2) @RussiaUN didn't have anything of note to add to #Putin's speech earlier today.
At least Nebenzia chaired the whole event properly as UNSC president. [2/5]
(3) Western UNSC members framed Russia's actions as an attack on the UN Charter and international system.
Non-Western members split on this framing in a very interesting way... [3/5]
The African UNSC members and Mexico basically agreed with Western members that an attack on Ukraine is an attack on @UN norms.
And Kenya in particular framed this brilliantly in terms of imperialism and colonialism. That was one of the best #UNSC speeches I have heard. [4/5]
But some big non-Western #UNSC members (Brazil, India and UAE) seemed to want to frame this as a local problem requiring dialogue, not a global crisis.
And China just didn't know what to say at all... [ENDS.]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
India is first non-NATO country to speak on #Ukraine in #UNSC tonight. Lots of talk about the need for diplomacy, de-escalation, etc. But no reference to Ukraine's sovereignty or condemnation of Russia.
Brazil expresses "extreme concern" about Ukraine in #UNSC, and calls for diplomacy for peace. Does raise sovereign equality of states and territorial integrity.
Avoids using the word "Russia".
Mexico (3rd non-NATO speaker on Ukraine in UNSC) does call out Russia -- a little more gingerly than NATO members but by name -- and talks about Ukrainian sovereignty. Notably firmer than India and Brazil, although also pivoting to diplomacy and dialogue.
... as I noted @CFR_CPA in December, @OSCE_SMM is also (for good or ill) a model for the sort of peace operations that are possible in conflicts involving major powers. [2/4] cfr.org/report/major-p…
There have been snarky responses to @columlynch's piece accusing anyone who thinks @UN can help #Ukraine are "clowns" etc.
But as I said "Nobody actually thinks that the Council will have a significant substantive role in negotiating a conclusion to a new war in Ukraine." [2/12]
.@USUN, @RussiaUN and other Council members will use the #UNSC to try to shape political narrative around #Ukraine.
For example, Russia recently held an informal SC meeting on threats to minorities in the #Baltics and #Ukraine.
But if @PoliticoRyan is right and Angela Merkel will play a leading role in "Our Common Agenda" follow-up, it is going to be hard to deny that the EU and its vision of multilateralism are pretty central to the project. [2/5] politico.com/newsletters/gl…
Fascinating 🧵 by @heatherwilly on the P5's joint paper on strategic nuclear domain, which highlights the importance of crisis prevention/communication mechanisms.
This ties in with questions I have about the potential for P5 dialogues on non-nuclear conflict management. [1/5]
Such P5 work (deliberately at a distance from the fetid day-to-day diplomacy of the #UNSC) could pave the way for the P5 summit that @franceonu has been pursuing for the last 2 years. [3/5] news.un.org/en/story/2021/…