I heard a story on the news today about calls to cut the federal #gas tax in response to rising prices. This is really bad idea. The gas tax supplies money to the federal government to do things like fund public transit. IF you want lower gas prices (IF), focus on companies.
First: there's been no reduction in overall exports of #oil & #gas from Russia since its war against #Ukraine, incl via #NordStream1 (c/o S&P Global). Russia did cut gas supply before invasion, not since. Energy traders are driving soaring global prices; not actual supply.
The major oil companies, all of which employ energy traders & make a profit off trading, not just selling, oil & gas, are currently making record profits due to the war. In the U.S., just a few Big Oil companies control oil & gasoline refining, distribution, marketing, & sales.
Thus, U.S. oil companies could be asked to limit gasoline price spikes to demonstrate a desire not to profit off of #RussiaWarOnUkraine. Alternatively, they could be told not to pass the price spike onto consumers by federal and state governments.
The Federal government and almost every state have anti-price gouging laws and laws banning “unconscionable sales practices” which can also be specifically triggered under unique emergency situations. Energy trading can also be brought under tighter regulation.
But, Americans pay shockingly little for #gasoline compared to other nations--a reason why we're the largest global consumer of gasoline, with devastating impacts to human health, the environment & climate; also leaving us at the mercy of fossil fuels & those who control them.
And consumption isn't equal, with wealthier Americans & industry consuming the lions-share of #gasoline (and thus able to afford higher prices). The longterm answer isn't lower prices, rather a transition off fossil fuels, including sustainable energy mass public transportation.
AND.... #gas prices shouldn't be rising right now anyway. Overall #oil supplies are stable & the price of oil has been falling since March 8. The price of oil is supposed to be the prime determinant of gas prices. So, oil companies could be passing savings onto consumers, no?
It's a well known phenomena called "rockets and feathers." When the price of oil rises, the price of gasoline immediately shoots up (and often out of proportion). But when the price of oil falls, the gas prices take a lot longer to catch up. It's also known as price-gouging.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Still no reduction in overall exports of #oil & methane (ie natural) #gas from Russia since its war against #Ukraine, incl via #NordStream1 (c/o S&P Global). Russia did cut gas supply before invasion, not since. Energy traders are driving soaring global prices; not actual supply.
The major oil companies, all of which employ energy traders & make a profit off trading, not just selling, oil & gas, are currently making record profits due to the war. In the U.S., just a few Big Oil companies control oil & gasoline refining, distribution, marketing, & sales.
Thus, U.S. oil companies could be asked to limit gasoline price spikes to demonstrate a desire not to profit off of #RussiaWarOnUkraine. Alternatively, they could be told not to pass the price spike onto consumers by federal and state governments.
The U.S. oil industry is lobbying for the Biden to go soft on Russian sanctions despite Ukraine invasion. "Sanctions should be as targeted as possible in order to limit potential harm" to U.S. companies, said the American Petroleum Institute.
Recall, between 2011 - 2013, then Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson signed cooperation agreements for 10 joint ventures with Russia’s Rosneft. As a result, Exxon's Russian holdings mushroomed to become nearly five times larger than its second-largest holdings—those in the U.S.
But in 2014, the Obama/Biden admin imposed oil sanctions against Russia after it invaded Crimea. The sanctions allowed some Exxon projects, but none of its Arctic or other offshore exploration, not only halting these operations but also making it impossible to book the reserves.
In August, I reported for @RollingStone on #Hurricane#Ida's destructive path through Louisiana's Cancer Alley and the home of Sharon Lavigne of @risestjames. On Sunday, I saw first hand the damage that persists. Sharon's GoFundMe supports her rebuilding. gofund.me/9186556d
In August, I wrote for @RollingStone on Sharon's work in the wake of #HurricaneIda and the damage to her home. On Sunday, I was shocked to see that 6 months later, Sharon is living in a trailer on her front lawn with her home largely uninhabitable. rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
While falling far short of what is necessary, it's difficult to exaggerate how fundamental a transformation #COP26 was from previous COPs in the manner in which fossil fuels were confronted by governments in and outside of formal negotiations.
A joint commitment by nearly 40 countries & institutions to end public finance for oil, gas, and coal projects overseas; The Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, launched by 12 countries and regions, the first diplomatic initiative to phase-out fossil fuel production; the methane pledge;
Where the Paris Climate Accord & all previous agreements assiduously eschewed the words "oil,""coal,""natural gas"or"fossil fuels" to intentionally avoid naming & targeting the production of these primary causes of the #ClimateCrisis
The final #COP26 text is now agreed to. The Paris Climate Accord, & all previous agreements, assiduously eschewed the words "oil,""coal,""natural gas"or"fossil fuels." This was to intentionally avoid naming & targeting the production of these primary causes of the #ClimateCrisis
By focusing exclusively on emissions, nations could continue, for example, to increase production of fossil fuels at home and export the products abroad, while "meeting" their Paris commitment to reduce their own domestic CO2 emissions by increasing domestic use of renewables.
Much has changed since Paris, incl @IEA & @IPCC_CH findings that no new investments in fossil fuel production are compatible with the Paris Accord, & the Hague ruling against Shell finding the company liable for its contributions to climate change via its fossil fuel operations.
On June 5, @Chevron tweeted this. How do Chevron's operations stack up in response to this statement? For now, let's just look at Chevron's two largest U.S. refineries, both located in communities that are disproportionately black and poor: Pascagoula, MS and Richmond, CA./1
Chevron's largest U.S. refinery is in Pascagoula, MS, a disproportionately black & poor community. Based on Chevron's most recent data, its Benzene releases in Pascagoula were over 50% greater than EPA "actionable" levels and the 5th highest in the nation.c/o @EnviroIntegrity /2
"Actionable” levels refer to those which should result in action taken by the company to lower releases. Benzene is a known human carcinogen. It's also measured as a "surrogate pollutant," expected to represent the release of a host of hazardous (though unmonitored) pollutants./3