🧵#artbook #fanart #fannibals #art #artists
1. The #artistsontwitter community is amazingly talented. I've supported many fan-run Kickstarters for artbooks. Now publishers are now getting in on it. Sadly fan artists who are not contract-savvy are open to exploitation...
2. I've seen a lot of tweets about an upcoming themed fan art book to be printed by an indie publisher. They set up a Kickstarter & raised over $160,000. Some artists were invited to create art for the book & subs were opened for everyone else.
3. To submit, artists were required to send in a completed work of art & wait to see if they were selected.
If selected they would not be paid a cash fee.
They would get a (insert drumroll...)
Free book, and of course, Kudos. (Whoop)🙌🙌🙌
4. I chatted to a few artists who submitted to this artbook. The series the book is based on is the subject of a MASSIVE fandom & was guaranteed to sell from the get-go. Artists want to be included whether they're paid or not- inclusion is the goal -which makes depressing reading
5. Loving a show is great but leaves inexperienced artists open to being used for that love. One told me they were sure the publisher 'wasn't pulling a fast one' & their art was a 'love letter to the series'.
Well, the reality is Love is blind & this publisher is taking the piss
6. #artistsontwitter Protect Yourselves.
Your art has value and if you don't value yourself and your work from the start of your career others will exploit you for profit.
For instance, with this particular project artists are made to send a completed work BEFORE selection.
7. If selected, the #artist is sent a retroactive Work For Hire contract. This is an illegal practice. You need to have read & signed a WFH contract BEFOREHAND. You need to agree to payment terms before lifting your finger to work on a project.
slater.legal/works-for-hire…
8. I get it. I've worked in the arts for 30 yrs. At the start, I was desperate to work with X, be associated with X director or a publisher in the belief that having them on my resume would boost my career. After working for a lot of shitheads I discovered I was wrong and naive.
9. The 'ExPoSure' myth had been shot to death & I'd spent too much time chasing employers for payments.
Agreeing to give your art to a publisher in return for a copy of the book while the #publisher profits & gives artists retroactive WFH contracts makes the project exploitative
10. The fact that u create such amazing art for the LOVE of a show should be an incentive to those creating artbooks for profit to #paytheartist fairly.
I love the show in question but I won't support this project. I will seek out artists if/when they sell prints so they profit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Isobel Starling

Isobel Starling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @isobel_starling

Jul 18, 2021
#Johnbarrowman has proven that he's a vacuous, self-consumed twat, and he has no idea about what women who work in #film and #theater go through and the vulnerable positions they are put in. The excuses for his behavior are bullshit. #notokay dailymail.co.uk/femail/article….
"In the theatre quick costume changes happen in the wings all the time, with everyone stripping off to get into their new outfits in time for the next scene,' he says. 'Girls might be braless, boys only in jockstraps. That's just how it is and no one gives it a second thought."
How blase, and ignorant.
THAT'S NOT 'JUST HOW IT IS!" This comment shows exactly how oblivious he is about his actions behind the scenes on stage/on set.
Women DO give it a second thought. Women who work in theater/ film worry about this stuff ALL THE TIME.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 21, 2019
THREAD 1/7 #readercommunity

#Readers who justify #bookpiracy because THEY are poor i.e can buy the latest tech, fashions, daily coffees but cannot 'afford' books, we need to have a talk, and #RealityCheck ...
1. Those who download from #pirate sites wouldn't buy the book anyway.

To justify theft by saying that the thief wouldn't pay for what they stole is ridiculous. Clearly, they wanted the product but didn't think it was 'worth' $4 because they can steal it without consequences.
2. Authors earn lots of money, they're just being greedy.

In the latest @ALCS_UK research "“The median annual income of a professional author is £10,500 (US$11,300), which is well below the minimum wage."

1% of authors earn huge sums, most of us barely scrape a living.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(