1/ If you believe that nowadays it is very easy to get legal advice. Then, this thread is for you. This thread may help you to think totally differently on lot of things relating to court cases.
2/ There are thousands of free resources on internet when a person can ask legal advice. There blogs, articles, paid articles which comes up on search and there are judgements and judgements. Search and you may start receiving calls guiding you free on your legal issue
3/ Some can search lawyers on LinkedIn and can send a hundred inmails seeking advice. Someone may guide him free. "Crowdfunding of Legal Knowledge". Are these methods useful? Or are they just "Baits and Traps"? Have you ever thought in this way?
4/ Suppose you have a medical condition. You search on net..You can know that for your condition, there are 5 medicines. But you may not be able which of them can be taken and what should be the dose. Doses are dependent on age, weight and other conditions of body.
5/ Then each of the five suggested medicines could have different side effects.
Same is about legal profession. One problem can be approached in several forum. How can one decide by getting free advices by sending messeges to several lawyers are by asking about it on twitter?
7/ Free advices of lawyers are seldom useful. Here is a joke which I read 30 years ago.
Some people were on a flying tour in a baloon. Then they saw land. They lowered down baloon to ask someone about the name country on which their baloon was flying.
8/ As they lowered their baloon, they saw a lawyer in black coat walking towards village. They further lowered down baloon and shouted at him,"Where are we?"
The man looked up at baloon, and replied, "You are 50 feet up in the air".
The people in baloon remained clueless.
9/ Another thing you must bear in mind, while searching for legal knowledge on internet, is about "No U Turn" policies of courts. Once you adopt a wrong course of legal action, you may not be allowed to take a U Turn by courts.
10/ Still another thing you should bear in mind, while reading laws on internet is about Non Application of "If This then That" Rule in court proceedings.
The facts can be similar, law can be same, judge can be same, lawyers can be same and yet, the judgement can be different.
11/ Very few lawyers can see the "Trends of the Courts". These trends differ from court to court, from district to district, from high court to high court etc.
The trends are invisible to person not familiar with courts. Trends need to be examined .
12/ Still another aspect is "Roaster". The cases are assigned to judges as per catagories of judges. Judges have their opinions on legal disputes. This factor is also to be considered while examine a legal issue.
13/ Still another thing to be examined before giving a legal advice is "Mindset of Parties". Some opposite parties can be highly cunning, genius, mighty powerful and full of bags of dirty tricks.
To give legal advise in such cases is a very delicate issue.
14/ Lawyers and Doctors gather knowledge + experience most of the time. Then, how they pay their bills? What do they sell? They sell their "opinions" and "advices" and "Related Services". This is how they maintain their families.
15/ Junior lawyers often receive clients who want them to do their cases free.
In 1987, a senior lawyer advised me, "In free cases, we get only frustrations, and nothing else".
In young age, I was full of desires to help the poor. I ignored his advice. I did many free cases.
16/ Looking back, I see that, that senior lawyer was right.
In 90% of free cases, I received only frustrations.
The poors had a "Sense of entitlement to free legal services".
This affected their logic.
It was difficult to reason with them.
Very difficult to help them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread : Some Reasons on why Anticipatory Bail, even without copy of FIR, ought to be granted to those who fear arrest for some social media post, posted or shared by them.
1) It is possible for courts to grant anticipatory bail to any law abiding person under Sec.438 of CrPC
2) The meaning of Anticipatory bail is simply this, the police should not arrest, but should get some personal bond from accused that he/she will co-operate with investigation.
3/ The grant of an anticipatory bail order, instantly frees the accused from fear arrest and torture by police of different States. It frees him/her from fears of custodial deaths or ill treatment in police station.
1/ भारत में कानूनी पेशे की वास्तविकता के साथ बैठक।
जून 1982 का दिन था। कोर्ट में मेरा पहला दिन था। मैं कोर्ट की कार्यवाही देखने के लिए चीफ ज्यूडिशियल मजिस्ट्रेट कोर्ट गया था।
स्वतंत्रता दिवस के बाद से गुजरात में निषेध कानून है।
नशे में पाए गए गरीबों को गिरफ्तार
2/ कर लिया गया है और उन पर अदालत में मुकदमा चलाया जा रहा है।
पूरे कोर्ट रूम में भीड़ थी और हवा में शराब की तेज गंध आ रही थी।
बचाव पक्ष के वकील भी पूरी तरह से नशे में थे।
जब भी वह जज को सबमिशन दे रहा था, उसके मुंह से शराब की गंध निकल रही थी।
न्यायाधीश पूरी तरह से मामले
3/ पर ध्यान केंद्रित कर रहा था। उन्होंने इस बात को नज़रअंदाज़ करना चुना कि बचाव पक्ष के वकील भी पूरी तरह से नशे में थे और उन्हें जेल भेजा जा सकता था.. न्यायाधीश ने बस गंध को नजरअंदाज कर दिया।
कोर्ट में यह मेरा पहला दिन था। मैंने सीखा है कि इस कानूनी पेशे में, हमारा पहला
1/ Meeting with REALITY of Legal Profession in India.
It was June 1982. My first day in court. I went in Chief Judicial Magistrate Court to see court proceedings.
There is Prohibition Law in Gujarat since Independance Day.
The poor, who were found drunk are arrested and
2/ are being tried in court of law.
The whole courtroom was crowded and there was a strong smell of alcohol in the air.
The defense counsel was also fully drunk.
Alcohol Smell was coming out from his mouth every time he was making submissions to Judge.
3/ The Judge was fully focused on the case on hand. He chose to ignore that defense counsel was also fully drunk and he was liable to be sent to jail.. The Judge simply ignored the smell.
This was my first day in court. I learned that in this legal profession,
INCREDIBLE IN INDIA Law Makers do not need to have a degree of law. Only for lawyers and judges, it is compulsory to pass a law college. No doubt, we have messed up everything. #Lawyers#lawtwitter
2/ New Laws are required NOT REQUIRED to be cleared by any Judicial Committee to examine how many more judges and staff will be needed to deal with cases under new proposed law.
3/ Finance Minister is NOT REQUIRED to provide budget for salaries of judges who may be required to deal with new litigation arising from new law. #lawyers
Thread for For Law Students and Young Lawyers: I am in legal profession since 40 years. I have learned three things.
1) Columbus set out on a long voyage to discover India. But in realty he landed on shores of America. Life is like that. We may have ambition to
2/ reach at one destination. But we may end up reaching at a different destination.
2) Life is like a long web series which has many seasons and many episodes. In each episode reach at one destination. But we may end up reaching at a different destination.
3/ 2) Life is like a long web series which has many seasons and many episodes. In each episode we solve one problem and then a cliff hanger for next episode appears. Thus we keep moving from one episode to next. We are the main character in this series.
Thread for Doctors (a thread to be updated time to time)
I will write here about,
What doctors can do to protect themselves, against complaints under SC/ST Act, complaints in police for medical negligence, complaints for medical negligence in
2/ police station, complaints filed in criminal courts, summons by court to private doctors to appear as a witness with medical record of a patient, cases in civil court for damages, steps a doctor can take if he perceives threats from a patient, etc.
3/ First basic principles : An error in diagnosis (or Judgement) is not by itself a negligence. If a patient dies during an operation or immediately after surgery, is by itself not a medical negligence.