Here's an interesting question ... #trans #gender #MerriamWebster
If you define yourself purely in opposition to something else, do you truly exist at all? 1/6
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1549438329787146241
If you define yourself purely in opposition to something else, do you truly exist at all? 1/6
For decades we have suggested that if your identity is defined by what you're not, you don't really have an identity. Something else has an identity and you are a pale shadow.
I'm not talking about gender. I'm talking about philosophy, morality, ethics, physics, and logic. 2/6
I'm not talking about gender. I'm talking about philosophy, morality, ethics, physics, and logic. 2/6
If you define your position as "not X" then your location is everywhere X is not. It's meaningless as a descriptor outside of a purely mathematical construct. 3/6
If all you have to say politically is "I'm not Republican", what does that mean that you actually believe and pursue? Can you truly be said to believe anything? 4/6
So, in trying to define "female" counter-assertively to "males," according to Merriam-Webster, the only thing you can know for sure is what a male is.
Ironically, that doesn't solve their problem; it just compounds it. 5/6
Ironically, that doesn't solve their problem; it just compounds it. 5/6
Which is the entire woke religion in a nutshell, isn't it? 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
