Let’s translate @mfa_russia’s doublespeak.

“Thanks to the Soviet-German non-aggression pact, the independent countries of central and eastern Europe were divvied up between the two powers, & hundreds of thousands of lives were lost or destroyed.” /1
In its effort to portray the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact as just another neutrality pact among many others in Europe at the time, Russia’s MFA deliberately manipulates history by “forgetting” to mention the treaty’s secret protocols. /2

encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/art…
It’s not as though the MFA doesn’t know about the protocols: although the USSR later denied their existence protocols (until Gorbachev acknowledged them in 1989), the #Kremlin actually displayed them along with the rest of the treaty in 2019. /3

theguardian.com/world/2019/aug…
In the secret protocols, the two states agreed on how Poland would be divided (a process that began a little more than a week later) and also who would get which of the Baltic states, with the USSR agreeing to pay Germany in exchange for Lithuania. /3

digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/110994
The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact became an important touchstone in the movement to restore Lithuanian independence.

In 1970, Stanislovas Jakas & Vaclovas Sevrukas brought copies of the secret protocol that were being secretly circulated by dissidents in Moscow back to #Lithuania. /4
Jakas and Sevrukas were severely punished by Soviet authorities.

They are buried now in Antakalnis Cemetary in Vilnius, & their headstones pay tribute to the role in publicizing the pact in Lithuania. /5

vle.lt/straipsnis/sta…

lkbkronika.lt/index.php/en/i…

lis.if.vu.lt/index27ae.html…
On 23 August 1987, on the anniversary of the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, the first unauthorized (by the Soviets) rally of the restoration of independence movement took place in Lithuania — about 3000 people attended, including Jakas. /6

lrt.lt/mediateka/iras…
Today, there’s a monument there in the square where the meeting happened. /7

vilniusgo.lt/2017/11/06/pam…
And in 1989, again on the anniversary of the fateful Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, Lithuanias joined their Baltic neighbors in a powerful peaceful protest demanding the restoration of their independence. /8
It’s not a huge stretch to say that public awareness of the secret protocols — and the subsequent recognition that the whole edifice of the Soviet Union had been built on a lie — doomed the USSR to collapse. A loss of legitimacy (however tenuous it may be) is hard to weather. /8
Gorbachev admitted, in 1989, under pressure from the People’s Congress of Deputies, to the existence of the secret protocols. Surely he hoped that confronting the past openly would heal the rift—but it was too little, too late./9

nytimes.com/1989/08/19/wor…

histdoc.net/history/1989-1…
In failing to admit the truth about what the pact with Nazi Germany contained, the #Kremlin wants to whitewash this history. In the Kremlin’s telling, the USSR is both the innocent victim and the righteous champion in the face of Nazi aggression. /10
There’s a grain of truth in that tale (as there is in most #disinformation). But the Kremlin’s telling —which equates the USSR to #Russia— obscures the fact that so many of the Soviet citizens who died as victims or as Red Army soldiers were Belarusians, Jews, & Ukrainians. /11
And the Kremlin’s tale conveniently forgets the willful harm it imposed on the lands it occupied thanks to the pact, especially the territory of Poland (which included at that time parts of what are now Belarus and Ukraine)… /12
… As well as the Baltic states, from which at least 169,000 people were deported to Soviet Central Asia and Siberia over the course of than a year. /12

gulag.online/articles/sovie…
The failure to really grapple with the Soviet past has been a deliberate policy during #Putin’s reign. From rewriting textbooks to shutting down memory-preserving NGOs like Memorial, the aim has been to stifle critical reflection about the past. /13

link.springer.com/chapter/10.100…
In pursuit of a history “free of contradictions & ambiguities,” Putin has encouraged the development of dangerous national myths. /14

themoscowtimes.com/2013/02/19/put…
Such myths may feel good, but they aren’t healthy, either for Russian society at home… or for anyone in the path of the Kremlin’s revisionist aims. /fin

newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/v…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Valerie Morkevičius

Valerie Morkevičius Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @vmorkevicius

Aug 4
Having written a book on ethics & realism myself, I feel obliged to counter Anton Lieven’s problematic account of what “ethical realism” requires in response to #Russia’s invasion of #Ukraine. /1

I see three major shortcomings with Lieven’s argument.

1) For a piece on “ethical realism,” very little explicit discussion of ethics can be found here. What ethical commitments does Lieven hold? What ethical commitments does he believe the US should uphold? /2
2) Lieven’s discussion of “vital interests” in this piece greenlights a broad set of interests for Russia, but presents a very narrow view of US national interests in the region. /3
Read 55 tweets
May 5
The argument (from both the left & the right, & from both secular & religious perspectives) that the ethical thing to do is to pressure Ukraine to make peace sooner rather than later, and to eschew military aid for humanitarian aid has been getting a lot of attention lately. /1
I believe most people making this argument do so in good faith, reflecting strongly held commitments to pacifism or nonviolence. But as someone who works within the just war tradition, I think many iterations of this argument get a few things wrong. /2
First, some variants of this argument simplify the ethical dilemma at stake here, boiling it down to “war is evil.” /3
Read 47 tweets
Feb 20
As someone whose research focuses on the just war traditions, I think it’s worth stating – firmly – that a reasonable argument cannot be made to justify a Russian invasion of #Ukraine. /1
Within the Christian just war tradition, there are 6 principles to consider, not as checkboxes to be ticked, but as concerns to be weighed against one another.

These include legitimate authority, just cause, right intent, proportionality, likelihood of success & last resort. /2
The content of these principles varies somewhat over time and between the Catholic/Orthodox/Protestant traditions, but the commonalities are much more significant than the differences. /3
Read 36 tweets
Feb 18
Compare this to the #Kremlin's refusal to even cooperate with the OSCE Vienna Document process.

Transparency is a way of reducing tensions, by making one's intentions clear. /1
#Ukraine's leaders have reiterated that they have no plans to advance into Russian-backed separatist territory, and have ordered their forces to exercise restraint in responding to fire from Russian-controlled territory. /2

wsj.com/articles/ukrai…
#Ukraine's leaders have invoked the #OSCE Vienna Document process as a way to build confidence through increased transparency. But #Russia has refused to cooperate at all. /3
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Today as the #Kremlin's #disinformation cycle goes into overdrive, it's worth remembering that while the volume is louder, the pattern is familiar.

The stories don't need to be credible or logical. Their purpose isn't to convince. Their aim is to sow doubt & confusion. /1
Confusion & doubt make it hard for audiences to know what is true, leading to paralysis.

They can make collective action difficult, by sowing dissension & distrust between partners. /2

files.ethz.ch/isn/194545/Bri…

research-management.mq.edu.au/ws/portalfiles…

semperfidelis.ro/e107_files/pub…
Thinking about the two big #disinformation stories swirling about today, we can see that little attempt is being made to make the narratives particularly credible. /3
Read 19 tweets
Feb 15
The #Kremlin signals with one hand that it’s interested in diplomacy — and perhaps it is — but with the other it’s continuing to ratchet up the pressure on #Ukraine, through political maneuvering, #disinformation operations, and #cyber attacks. /1
Today the Duma voted to ask #Putin to recognize the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics as independent states. If Putin does so, the Minsk peace agreements would be effectively made void. /2

english.pravda.ru/news/russia/15…
The language used to describe this action in Pravda is especially telling. Note the claim that this action is “morally justified,” and more important the claim that recognition will “protect” the population from “external threats” and “the policy of genocide.” /4 Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(