Interesting to note: Tesla also wanted to make a #nickel sulphate refinery side by side with #lithium in order to get a grip on the most worrisome lithium ion battery raw materials.
Tesla are now revisiting plans to relocate its upstream battery chemicals activities to the Gulf Coast to save shipping raw materials / ore / waste product in land.
Makes shipping raw material from Canada, South America and Australia easier. #lithium
Also note for #graphite - Syrah Resources is building its #anode facility (US government backed) next door in Louisiana… Tesla has a supply deal in place. 8,000 tonnes/ year initially = 6-7GWh worth.
Tesla also signs a supply deal with a major lithium producer, FMC Lithium (now Livent) which ultimately becomes its initial primary supplier back then.
Spodumene and Canada is always in the thinking but nothing emerges.
📅 Sept 2020: Tesla Battery Day - we are firmly in the GigaEra. #GigaNevada up & running for ~1.5 years; #GigaShanghai 3 months out, #GigaBerlin anticipation builds
Tesla annouce #GigaTexas as Terafactory and with it most significant plans to go upstream of battery supply chain
❌ Tesla announce Lithium hydroxide plans at #GigaTexas but doesn’t happen
❌ Tesla announce land claims of lithium clay in Nevada, captures buzz of the day = Tesla gets into mining = Tesla mines in USA etc
Nothing materialises
📺 Benchmark Take >
📅 2020/2022: Post Tesla Battery Day momentum into a year of next level #EV demand surge.
If Tesla and Elon Musk had followed their instincts and gone all in on #lithium during first serious lithium thoughts (2015/2016), they would now be operating at least one refinery and prob have a second / third, fourth on the way.
Instead, as the world moves head first at 200mph into EVs, lithium’s prices have done this as supply struggles to keep up
Tesla’s latest actions to build a lithium refinery in Texas is the right thinking but again, if they pulled the trigger in 2020 they would be much further ahead of the curve.
Instead: stable lower cost lithium supply isn’t guaranteed for Tesla any more…
Tesla’s lithium position is threatening to undermine its world class #EV and battery (its GigaBusiness) it has built to date.
That and increased competition from China’s EV industry, Detroit and Europe has firmly put the cooker *gas* on to full power
Making lithium chemicals from scratch is not rocket science (pun intended) but it is not easy.
The Tianqi lithium hydroxide plan in Australia is an example to look to.
Annouced: 2016
Initial launch: 2018
Actual start: H2 2022
Full ramp: ~2025?
On lithium raw materials, Tesla has made a notable shift in 10 years from unconventional / not yet commercial sources of lithium (geothermal brines, clay) to commercial (continental brines & now spodumene)
From more exotic sources that could disrupt, to more stable / more known
Long term and super long term Investments are need in every one of these arenas to solve this Great EV Raw Material Disconnect we are seeing today #batteries
As has been showcased by Tesla, you need to think 10 years plus down the track
The upstream trend for Tesla and EV makers / OEMs is clear.
Increasing competition means that OEMs will need to “become miners” aka own the lithium mines and resources if they are to 100% guarantee lithium supply, make batteries and make EVs
When #EV OEMs need to become miners has been the Benchmark story of 2022. @benchmarkmin
What we mean by this is outlined in this thread:
Future EV demand is surging beyond the ability of the lithium ion battery supply chain to respond in full.
As we approach the end of the decade, the number of EVs that’s OEMs want to produce become impossible to make considering the critical battery raw material volumes in the pipeline … if all existing expansions and new mines make it, in most cases there still wont be enough
#BASF freezes new business in #Russia but commits to existing business which includes developing a ‘zero carbon’ nickel pipeline into Germany via Finland for lithium ion batteries and #EVreuters.com/article/ukrain…
European battery and EV makers need the more localised Nornickel - BASF nickel unless they want to rely more on Indonesia and China sources for the bulk of nickel needs.
And comes with its own ESG issues to deal with: tailings disposal, deforestation, carbon footprint.
More high quality battery ready nickel sources means more batteries and more electric vehicles.
It also means less ICE vehicles and less oil.
Note: Russia supplies 25% of Europe’s oil and 40% of Europe’s diesel.
Russia’s Nornickel (Norilsk) supplies 20% of world’s class 1 nickel - the suitable supply for lithium ion batteries and #ElectricVehicles (and 7% of global nickel)