Claudia Denkinger Profile picture
Oct 15 7 tweets 3 min read
We just published as preprint our RCT on convalescent and vaccinated plasma.
Importantly the trial showed that in a selected group of patients with hematological and oncological malignancies, SARS-Cov-2 antibody containing plasma is a effective medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
In fact, it not only reduced time to discharge from the hospital (primary endpoint) but also survival (secondary endpoint). While these results should be confirmed in a separate study, the effect size is convincing.
Note that the study confirmed findings of other studies, that showed no effect in unselected elderly patients and patients with laboratory findings suggesting higher risk of severe disease.
Titers of neutralizing antibodies increase in patients with cancer only in response to plasma while in other groups they increase even without plasma donation. Thus suggesting a pathophysiological explanation of the clinical findings.
These results come at a time, when monoclonal antibodies are no longer effective in these patients and other treatment options are often limited due to drug-drug interactions and other reasons.
Thus these results suggests that especially high titer Ideally hybrid convalescent/vaccinated plasma which is easily accessible could provide a treatment option for these vulnerable patients who often are not sufficiently protected by vaccination
#plasma
#treatment
#COVID
#Cancer

@CasaValli
@COVID19nCCC
@DrJLHenderson
@mvankerkhove
@LabTidow
@mugecevik
And thank you to the many contributors and patients who made this study possible

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Claudia Denkinger

Claudia Denkinger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cdenki

Oct 14
We just published a preprint of a 20-study individual patient data meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield of urine versus sputum based diagnostic tests for TB.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
The work impressively shows why we need a non-sputum based test for TB even if it compromises on sensitivity in comparison to the sputum-based tests. Sputum is simply a difficult sample to get.
This work was done in HIV+ patients, but it applies more broadly to TB in children, extrapulmonary TB, and I would also venture to say TB in underserved settings.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 8
Polio - is back.
We thought we had it almost eliminated but were not able to go the final mile in countries like Afghanistan, Nigeria ridden by conflict
#polio bmj.com/content/379/bm…
Just to remind ourselves, Polio is this horrible disease that can leave people paralyzed for life. Recently one of the last people died who was in an iron lung due to Polio, that is paralyzed so the he was unable to breath on his own.
In 2016 we were at 46 cases globally and it was a matter of walking the final mile....no it is no longer
And it will again be a matter of equity in access to vaccines and communication about the individual and population health benefit.
#equity
Read 7 tweets
Aug 10
#Tuberkulose
#Vaccine
Impfung fuer Tuberkulose - Es gibt sie, sie ist nicht schlecht, vor allem in Kindern und wir duerfen sie in Deutschland NICHT geben, auch nicht in hoch-Risiko Personen

Mit dieser neuen Studie aendert sich dies hoffentlich
thelancet.com/journals/langl…
Andere Daten, die dies unterstuetzen
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2509719…
A meta-analysis of observational studies of BCG vaccination showed a pooled estimate of 27% efficacy against initial M. tuberculosis infection and 71% efficacy against tuberculosis disease.
nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
In a recent randomised trial in the NEJM, BCG efficacy to prevent infection in adolescents was 45.3%.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2433691…
Efficacy is thought to be greatest in persons without previous mycobacteria exposure and may last for 10 years.
Read 6 tweets
May 27
The world is moving on. But for those interested: We just published the update to our living systematic review on accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDTs with a meta-regression assessing the influencing factors journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/a…
In brief, Ag-RDTs detect most of the individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, and almost all (>90%) when high viral loads are present, independent of variant (at least for all known variants; for Omicon, I am extrapolating from other data).
With viral load, as estimated by Ct-value, being the most influential factor on their sensitivity, they are especially useful to detect persons with high viral load who are most likely to transmit the virus.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 3
Viral kinetics in a controlled human experiment with WT Sars Cov2
Insights:
- incubation period short: approx 2days
- virus first detectable in the throat
- 18hrs later in the nose
- viral load rose higher in the nose
- symptoms apparent after 2-4 days

researchsquare.com/article/rs-112…
- viable virus for approx 6.5days
- but PCR positive in 33% at day 28 still

What does this tell us about rapid tests?
In summary:
- tests should be performed in the nose because they were optimized for the nose (most tests)
- an additional throat swab might detect the infection earlier
- but saliva can affect the test negatively
Read 6 tweets
Jan 12
#Omicron
#RapidTests
Ein paar Worte zur Erklaerung der aktuellen Datenlage

Grundsaetzlich kann man sagen, dass die Schnelltests nach wie vor gut im Nasenabstrich funktionieren.

Zwar ist die analytische Sensitvitaet wohl eventuell ein wenig geringer:
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Aber wichtig ist die klinische Sensitvitaet und die ist weiterhin sehr gut. Wohl auch, weil die Viruslast bei Omicron sehr schnell ansteigt. Hier eine der ersten Publikation zur klinischen Sensitvitaet einer mir sehr gut bekannten Gruppe aus USA.
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Die Frage ist mehr: Wuerden Tests, die einen Rachenabstrich nutzen, die Infektion frueher erkennen?

Das wird von mehreren Anekdoten berichtet.
Ausserdem zeigen Studien mit PCR vom Speichel, dass die Infektion früher erkannt wird.
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(