STOPCOMMONPASS โŒ Profile picture
Oct 16 โ€ข 4 tweets โ€ข 3 min read
๐Ÿ“Š We've analysed 226 countries/territories with information provided by @FCDOtravelGovUK. Here's what we found:

โœ… 125 countries have no #COVID19 border restrictions

โŒ 15 continue to implement a 'jab only' entry policy:
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ America
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡จ Turks & Caicos Islands
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ด Tonga

(contd.)
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ณ Pitcairn Island
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ผ Palau
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Phillipines
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ท Nauru
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Micronesia
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ญ Marshall Islands
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท Liberia
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ Ghana
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฏ Fiji
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Cook Islands

Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, South Georgia contained no sufficient or reliable data to include from FCDO advice.
There are *more countries restriction free* than there are continuing to impose measures, i.e. COVID-status, testing, recovery, & that looks set to continue.

This forms an important part of our argument as to why the #NHS COVID Pass scheme must rapidly wind down & close.
We'll include this data with our letter to @theresecoffey tomorrow, 17th October.

Also not forgetting the recent #EU Special Committee Meeting on #COVID19 with @pfizer. It's time for all #vaccinepassports to be confined to the dustbin of history ๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with STOPCOMMONPASS โŒ

STOPCOMMONPASS โŒ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @org_scp

Oct 15
A quick look under the hood of @InstituteGC new 'One Shot' campaign & its GHSC - Global Health Security Consortium.

A lot of familiar faces & money involved.

(contd.)
Blair received 23 grants from Gates to date & the latest being $350,000 in May '22.

The @UniofOxford received $3,754,808 in Sept '22 out of 128 committed grants.

gatesfoundation.org/about/committeโ€ฆ

gatesfoundation.org/about/committeโ€ฆ
Prof. Sir John Bell is Regus of Uni. of Oxford as well as a member of the Gates Foundation Scientific Committee.

Here he is again advising the UK Govt on 'Freedom Passes'.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 13
Over one year on & now knowing that @pfizer didnโ€™t test their product on stopping transmission of #SARSCoV2, would you care to correct your โ€˜thoughtsโ€™ Adam, or shall we do the honours.
Did it ever occur to Mr. Wagner that the IHR received its biggest update in 2005, published in 2007, as well as Yellow Fever being a *completely different* virus as compared to #SARSCoV2, where itโ€™s certification is only used in *specific countries* & has a CFR of 20-50%
โ€˜Inevitableโ€™ that #vaccinepassorts would become โ€˜the normโ€™. Sounds like something that Shapps or Blair would say.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 13
On 22nd Jan, @RachaelMaskell asked @maggie_erewash if an assessment was made re: risk of vaccinated people being infectious at venues requiring the domestic #NHS COVID Pass.

Now that we know @pfizer didn't test re: transmission, we invite you to read Ms. Throup's response โคต๏ธ
Assuming that @MHRAgovuk @DHSCgovuk had critical data, or lack thereof, on transmission since procurement, what Ms. Throup said about @pfizer jab reducing transmission by 50% is a LIE.

The Govt also admit their uncertainty surrounding jabs & transmission with #Omicron.
In summary, Ms. Throup claimed certification would 'reduce risk' in settings where the COVID Pass was required but then caveated explaining they wouldn't 'eliminate the possibility' of infectious people attending or transmitting.

This is contempt of Parliament. Unacceptable.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 30
๐Ÿšจ The fifteenth & final report on non-devolved provisions of the Coronavirus Act (2020) has been published.

Since the last report, all temporary, non-devolved provisions in the Act have now expired or been
repealed. Apart from some 'permanent provisions' under the Act...contd.
Although the majority of provisions have expired, specific powers remain in force under the Act & new primary legislation is required in order to repeal them.

We imagine this will be completed after the winter season has ended, i.e. by 31st March 2023.
(i.) Section 11 relating to continued indemnity cover for 'NHS clinical negligence'. Make of that what you will.

(ii.) Section 63, yet again the Govt are retaining these powers to make further provisions, if necessary, within the Act.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 14
๐Ÿšจ THREAD: As #Britain continues to mourn the loss of #QueenElizabeth II, the remaining provisions of the #CoronavirusAct are due to expire in #Scotland on 30th Sept & #England #Wales around the same time.

But some 'permanent provisions' may not expire as expected... (contd.) The Coronavirus Act (2020)
While three of the provisions & a part of the fourth (s.55b) were repealed, there's mention of provisions remaining 'necessary' to support 'pandemic recovery' & the Govt Living with COVID plan.
The 'permanent provision' of s.63 - 'power to make supplementary provisions' & it's permanent fixture by virtue of s.89 of the Act, raised our eyebrows ๐Ÿ‘€

'Retroactively' to our interpretation is the Govt saying that they don't want to let go of this particular power.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 13
๐Ÿ†” "With an ambition for the NHS App to be a one stop shop for health needs, the strategy commits to a target of 75% of the adult population to be registered to use the NHS App by March 2024."

A centralised digital wallet linked to facial biometrics.

gov.uk/government/newโ€ฆ
The Govt bold target of 75% of the adult UK population registered on the #NHS app, then there must be something else coming to help them drive those figures.

Just like the COVID Pass drove people towards 'jabbing for freedom', out of fear they couldn't travel.
Lest we forget that @NHSDigital won't publish their contract with @iProov citing 'security' reasons.

iProov are also on record stating "it could not disclose how long it holds facial data for" other than no longer than necessary under the contract.

theguardian.com/society/2021/sโ€ฆ
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(