The main consumers of gas is North West, Central & South East EU. We disregard Nordics which consumes little.
North West temps are currently 6% higher than its 30-y normal - a lot!
Temps are forecast to stay above normal into Dec. However, post 10 Nov only by 1.5%.
2/n
Both South East & Central Europe are 5% above 30-year normal temps too. Both regions are forecast to normalise after 10 November.
That will leave gas storages constrained well into Dec.
My hunch is that gas prices will not recover much until storages go < 55% (Jan/Feb).
3/n
The risk to this forecast is that...
(a) above temp forecast is wrong;
(b) that Kremlin will turn off additional flows (into Velke = 15bcm annualised; LNG = 20bcm annualised).
(c) there is a NOR pipe sabotage.
All very possible.
4/n
Finally, let me explain again why volatility is here to stay:
1) Europe is in a rotation, away from RUS pipe flows towards LNG imports; 2) For that, Europe expands its LNG regas import capacities and de-bottlenecks its infrastructure;
4) The European industry (mainly utilities) does NOT (currently) replace long-term Nord-Stream; Yamal; Brotherhood contracts with NEW long-term contracts in Qatar, Africa or the USA;
5) Instead the industry bought LNG on the SPOT market, away from Asia (while China bought less due to Covid measures);
6) Buying (or not buying) spot LNG bids up (or down) LNG cargos but does NOT underpin investments into UPSTREAM gas activity by producers (Qatar et al);
7/n
7) Yes, certain US exporters like Cheniere invest into more LNG export capacities which may trigger some US producers to produce more;
8) But not Qatar or African producers. They will not help Europe source additional 60-80Mt of new LNG (which is what Europe needs pa);
8/n
9) Qatar instead needs a long-term commitments to invest into additional (upstream & terminal) capacities to earn back their capital. They won't gamble on EU's future needs;
10) Of course, at the margin Trafigura or Shell buy some l-t contracts to speculate on future demand;
9/
11) But such speculation means they will try and sell it to the highest bidder by definition.
12) For the European industry to have price stability, European utilities need to invest into l-t LNG contracts globally themselves (for which they get "cost +" prices);
10/n
13) We are seeing none of that now. But only that would create a stable l-term basis for Europe's industry.
14) Utilities have to comply with EU climate laws which requires them to be net-zero by 2050. So they do not have the legal framework to make l-t commitments.
11/n
15) Therein lies the task of the EU Commission. They must adapt such laws are risk being the source of a long-term gas and power crisis in Europe - and with it the de-industrialisation of heavy gas users such as the chemical industry;
12/n Thx
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Great Rotation: With the invastion of Ukraine, VVP decided to use gas as a weapon & cut pipeline flows into Europe.
In return, Europe maxed out LNG terminal capacities & contracted every available free LNG cargo globally to compensate the collapse of Russian flows.
2/n
Europe was able to attract LNG by being the best business globally.
How? By offering the highest prices. A cargo owner such as Trafigura or Total which bought LNG at Cheniere in US for $4.1/MMBtu + $3 gasification fee in Jan 2022 booked a pre-shipping profit of $21/MMBtu.
Why has TTF collapsed? Is Europe out of the woods? What matters for commodity price formations? What will matter in 2023...?
1/n
European gas prices - both TTF & NBP - have collapsed right into the start of the winter season, down from its peak of €338/MWh post Nord Stream 1 sabotage news to now €63/MWh.
Mind you though, TTF was €13/MWh 2 years prior - up still 370%.
2/n
Why is TTF lower?
Because natgas can only be consumed or stored. If storage is (95%) full & not consumed (mild weather), prices have to do the work to keep system balanced as comdties trade in present (d-s), unlike equities/bonds which discount future.
Among others, it removes 0.8-1.0mbpd of PRODUCTION, bringing KSA back to a sustainable profile while it may not reduce OPEC EXPORTS as KSA/UAE/K consume less crude themselves in winter. Yet, it should keep the shorts in check.
I subscribe to everything HRH said. Media with brand names like @Reuters either hire the right journalists or do not deserve answers. Energy security is not a boulevard topic. Media outlets must understand their responsibilities in this too (underinvestment; climate hysteria).
Isolating its wind & solar generation (RES) for the month of Sept however reveals future challenges.
GER had 9 days in Sept with little #wind. Not just Germany, all of Europe. On avg, GER used 2.7GW of its 62GW wind cap.
That is a capacity factor of 4.5%. Ouch!
2/n
While Sept turned GER into an importer for 2d (from CZE, SWE & DK) to cover consumption (FRA couldn't help; coal maxed out), RES also required it to export excesses during 15d.
Its Energiewende already turned GER into an imp/export "junky" as d-s are tough to match.
The European electricity grid is a modern miracle. It is the largest synchronous electrical grid (by connected power) in the world. It interconnects 520 million end-customers in 32 countries, including non-European Union members such as Morocco or Turkey.