Discussions about #FreeSpeech are misguided in the information age.
Even before our voices are drowned out by the noise on social media, or overwritten by information combatants, we lose our agency and decision autonomy to manipulative complex systems we don’t fully understand.
The whole point of the #enlightenment, the scientific revolution, our educational and #epistemic institutions was to empower individuals to find a way out of their self-imposed #immaturity, to take #agency over their lives and make informed decisions.
We need #epistemic clarity about reality, for without it, our agency will be blunted & our freedom a charade
It is public-interest education, journalism & science that truly make individuals in a #democratic society free, not the right to cast a vote or to elect a representative
#Asymmetric actors will continue to abuse any and all #information systems in the 21st century to create #fragmented realities to their benefit.
They have seen their #opportunities and learned their lessons, so the real question is:
Why have we not learned ours?
I do not have a great answer for that, but I believe it is largely because we have created a world that has few things to offer to vast numbers of people who find themselves #trapped in fragmented realities, often created and nudged towards by specific #engagements#algorithms.
The #addictive dopamine kicks from sharing, responding, and liking are one thing.
However, the psychological #dependence on confirmation (and other cognitive) biases to make sense of our #uncertain world, the feeling of #control, #community, and #belonging are to be found on...
... social media, albeit in the worst and most #abusive way possible; for the #extraction of our data and at the cost of our #sanity and often #humanity
We are not only the products, but we are also dependent on the attention economy and many cling to its distractions to avoid..
...another crisis of modern times; a quest for #meaning and #purpose, a quest for #belonging & a quest for being part of something bigger than ourselves
These are fundamental needs that make us human, yet how many avenues does modern society offer participate and self-actualize?
We should make no mistake that when we find ourselves pulled towards customized #fragmented realities, or when we get sucked into believing #conspiracy theories, it is not solely by their inherent attractiveness, we are also pushed towards them by other complex #mechanisms.
Unredacted 'Fauci emails' proving no scientists had any idea about the virus and no inclination of any cover-up, quite the opposite actually, they investigated thoroughly the idea of a #lableak.
Lableakers: WHERE ARE THE HIDDEN EMAILS WHERE THEY DO THE COVERUP STUFF? 🙄🙄
I hope this will be a lesson to many in the media who extended a lot of false goodwill to the fantasies of rank #conspiracists over the statements of professional virologists just doing their work.
The fact that they double down after being proven wrong is just 🚩🚩🚩
As I said previously, and repeatedly, there is no place in polite society for people who profit from #lies, who push harmful conspiracy myths that expose scientists to harassment, threats, and #stochastic terrorism
Any journalist who still decides to #amplify them is accountable
I think many people do not conceptualize properly how Musks actions will manifest and alter Twitter, occupying opposing sites between 'nothing gonna change at the core' to 'everything will break down eventually'.
Both views are insufficient to understand what is happening.
1/
Musk's actions can be seen as perturbations to a self-organized system that evolved around a set of rules & environmental restrictions. This complex system has adapted itself against competing social media systems and showed a certain robustness & stability to a changing world
2/
Musk's strong perturbations threw the system out of equilibrium, and as long as they persist, will keep pushing the system further and further away from it, until one of two things happen.
A) new equilibrium is found
B) disintegration of the whole into smaller subsystems
3/
The saddest part about the repeated harassment of scientists by conspiracy theorists, influencers and information combatants is that it is not a new phenomenon, but a well established tactic.
What's new is that the information age made it a crowd-sourced project. But why? 1/
The uncertainty of the pandemic brought a variety of scientists to the forefront of society; virologists, epidemiologists, vaccine researchers, and doctors were in demand and many did the best they could to explain, advise and help society navigate the pandemic.
2/
This newfound power and authority of science over parts of societal decision-making did not go down well with more traditional power-holders, from influencers to businesses to politicians.
To re-assert influence, they discredit science e.g through the use of conspiracy myths
3/
Why is it so difficult to find anybody to make a scientific case for the lableak? There is not one single paper published that lays out a lableak case that accounts for basic scientific evidence we do have.
For example, how do the many different engineering scenarios account
1/
for the fact that SC2 has a mosaic genome consisting of like 27 genomic pieces that have multiple ancestors found in the wild?
It is a non-starter to talk about design, only recombination in the wild explains it. Period.
Anybody whose lableak fantasy blog still involves
2/
deliberate engineering has no idea what they are talking about and need to exit the discussion, they are at best amateurs making noise, likely useful idiots or at worst motivated grifters and liars.
Now rinse repeat for all the people who claim SC2 was 'derived' from RaTG13
3/
Please share @janeqiuchina extensively sourced collection of problems from a recent @propublica@KatherineEban piece.
Propublica has not yet offered a response, correction or retraction, which is journalistic malfeasance. They can not be allowed to sweep this under the rug. 1/
I know it seems like an esotheric topic, but @propublica is a 6 pulitzer prize winning organisation. They have hard earned credibility & responsibility to correct their errors.
There are many excellent investigative journalists at propublica, are they okay letting the shoddy,
2/
unqualified and motivated propaganda piece by @KatherineEban tarnish their work and reputation too? I doubt it. That is why a correction/retraction is necessary.
Democracy relies on responsible journalism, and Eban did not even get the facts right in her article.
4/
The beautiful part about being a conspiracy myth content creator is that you get to be scientifically wrong constantly and never lose any credibility with those who want to believe and don't care about evidence anyways, only that the myth 'looks' and 'sounds' scientific.
Because it will bring engagement, some journalists and influencers then amplify the scientific meme content as 'science', just because it superficially looks like it.
My question: Who is to blame? The people who want to believe? Those who create meme content? Or the amplifiers?
And what if people creating & spreading scientific meme content are not only scientifically wrong, but are purposefully committing scientific fraud to manipulate people who want to believe? And what if amplifiers know all of that and don't care?