The political left (Democrats) have good control over Hollywood, the Media, Big Tech, Big Pharma, Education, the FBI, CIA, DOJ, IRS, CDC, FDA, NSA, DHS, and the WEF.
They’re all colluding together to create an all powerful entity.
Did you know that spyware is being used by your government to suck your data in from your mobile phones in the name of homeland security
Human rights activists, dissidents and journalists alike aren’t immune to this #SpywareEverywhere
VICTOR BOUT DOESN’T USUALLY TRANSPORT WEAPONS WORTH MULTIMILLIONS OF DOLLARS, BUT WHEN HE DOES IT’S USUALLY FOR THE US GOVERNMENT #MerchantOfDeath
If anyone threatens them or questions them in mainstream media… essentially the democrats tactic is to suppress #FreedomOfSpeech like this
- as per their Intel agents briefs
- they’re Russian agents getting paid by Russia to undermine US interests
If you don’t agree with us… you’re a terrorist, you’re a #misinformation spreader, you’re a national traitor, you’re a Russian spy agent, you’re a threat to our peaceful democracy.
Massive fire reported at NYPD's evidence control and impound warehouse in Brooklyn, NYC… what are they trying to destroy
JFK before his assassination, on trying to stop the secret societies
THE PENTAGON FAILED AUDIT 5 TIMES, THEY HAVE GAPING HOLES
The Pentagon avoided federally mandated audits for 25 years, but that didn't stop the truth from coming out that there had been over $21 TRILLION of unaccounted-for financial adjustments over 17 years.
There are currently 15+ ex-FBI/CIA agents working at Twitter RIGHT NOW at executive positions
Meta (Facebook) has over 60+ ex-FBI/CIA agents
Media platforms have become nothing but enforcement arms for FBI, CIA, NSA, DHS, CDC, FDA, DOD, DOE etc.
The CIA murdered JFK and like @RobertKennedyJr says, this is the most courageous newscast in 60 years from which US machine was run by #DeepState behind the scenes. They don’t care who the president & VP are, they further their own interests
FBI is corrupt to the core, misusing taxpayers dollars to suppress speech for the same taxpayers while leaving glaring cases unsolved like Epstein clients, child trafficking, Biden’s laptop, Larry Nassar etc.
Crime statistics stand as irrefutable pillars of truth, drawn from meticulously documented police reports, arrests, and victim surveys compiled by agencies like the FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics, offering a clear lens into societal realities without bias or agenda. For instance, data reveals that Black males aged 14-49, comprising just 3% of the U.S. population, are responsible for 43% of all murders, a stark disparity rooted in verifiable trends from 1980-2008 and echoed in more recent FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing Black offenders accounting for over 50% of homicides despite being 13% of the population. These numbers aren't fabricated; they're cross-verified through methods like the Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Crime Victimization Survey, exposing patterns that demand attention rather than denial, such as the overrepresentation in violent crimes that persists across decades and guides effective policy when embraced honestly.
Yet, governments and officials often undermine this objectivity by manipulating data or reshaping narratives to fit political ideologies, eroding public trust and hindering real solutions. Examples abound, from the Biden administration's claims of historic crime lows based on selective FBI stats later criticized as misleading, to investigations into D.C. police allegedly altering felony classifications to downplay crime rates, and New York PD's documented pressure on officers to underreport incidents for favorable optics. Such efforts, often driven by a reluctance to address uncomfortable racial disparities, only perpetuate cycles of violence by diverting focus from root causes like socioeconomic factors and urban decay, proving that twisting the truth serves no one and stalls progress toward safer communities.
A thread on three letter agencies and their subordination to political narratives👇
Lip reading, often portrayed in media as a foolproof method for deciphering spoken words from visual cues alone, falls far short of reliability when used as primary evidence in criminal cases. The human mouth produces visually similar movements for numerous words and sounds—consider how "pat," "bat," and "mat" appear nearly identical on the lips—leading to error rates that can exceed 50% even among trained professionals. Factors such as poor lighting, camera angles, facial obstructions like beards or masks, accents, or rapid speech further exacerbate inaccuracies, turning what might seem like clear footage into a guessing game. Studies from organizations like the National Deaf Children's Society highlight that lip reading is context-dependent and subjective, with interpreters potentially injecting unconscious bias or misinterpreting non-verbal cues, rendering it unsuitable as standalone proof of guilt in high-stakes legal proceedings.
In courtrooms, where evidence must meet rigorous standards of admissibility and scientific validity, relying on lip reading as the main pillar of a prosecution risks miscarriages of justice. Legal precedents, such as those in U.S. cases invoking the Daubert standard, emphasize that expert testimony must be based on testable, peer-reviewed methods with known error rates—criteria lip reading often fails to satisfy due to its interpretive nature and lack of standardization. Courts in the UK and elsewhere have similarly dismissed or heavily scrutinized lip reading evidence, noting its vulnerability to challenge and the potential for alternative explanations. Ultimately, elevating such a flawed technique to primary status undermines the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt," inviting appeals, wrongful convictions, and eroded public trust in the justice system; it should instead serve, at best, as corroborative support alongside more robust forensic or auditory evidence.
In the shadowed annals of empire, the invasion of Iraq revealed the blueprint: invent an existential threat, amplify it through every megaphone of power, then unleash hell under the banner of salvation. Weapons of mass destruction—those ghostly specters that never materialized—served as the perfect phantom, terrifying enough to silence dissent yet vague enough to evade accountability when the lie collapsed. The true prize was never aluminum tubes or yellowcake; it was the second-largest proven oil reserves on Earth, waiting to be liberated from a dictator and delivered into the hands of Western corporations. The war was sold as a moral crusade, but the receipts came later in the form of no-bid contracts and decades of guaranteed crude flowing through friendly pipelines.
Venezuela now stands in the crosshairs of the same script, only the boogeyman has been rebranded for a new century. Where once we feared mushroom clouds, we are now instructed to tremble before weapons of mass intoxication—tons of cocaine allegedly funneled through Caracas by a regime painted as the kingpin of global narco-terrorism. The opioid crisis ravaging American towns becomes the emotional battering ram, the humanitarian catastrophe of Venezuelan migrants the moral veneer, while the real objective glitters beneath the Orinoco Belt: the largest oil reserves on the planet, currently outside the grip of ExxonMobil and Chevron. The pattern is identical—demonize, destabilize, invade or install a compliant regime—only this time the pretext is not yellowcake but white powder, and the war will be waged not with tanks rolling across the desert but with sanctions, proxy forces, and perhaps, when the moment is ripe, a "limited intervention" to stop the drugs and secure the wells. History does not repeat; it simply changes costumes.