The political left (Democrats) have good control over Hollywood, the Media, Big Tech, Big Pharma, Education, the FBI, CIA, DOJ, IRS, CDC, FDA, NSA, DHS, and the WEF.
They’re all colluding together to create an all powerful entity.
Did you know that spyware is being used by your government to suck your data in from your mobile phones in the name of homeland security
Human rights activists, dissidents and journalists alike aren’t immune to this #SpywareEverywhere
VICTOR BOUT DOESN’T USUALLY TRANSPORT WEAPONS WORTH MULTIMILLIONS OF DOLLARS, BUT WHEN HE DOES IT’S USUALLY FOR THE US GOVERNMENT #MerchantOfDeath
If anyone threatens them or questions them in mainstream media… essentially the democrats tactic is to suppress #FreedomOfSpeech like this
- as per their Intel agents briefs
- they’re Russian agents getting paid by Russia to undermine US interests
If you don’t agree with us… you’re a terrorist, you’re a #misinformation spreader, you’re a national traitor, you’re a Russian spy agent, you’re a threat to our peaceful democracy.
Massive fire reported at NYPD's evidence control and impound warehouse in Brooklyn, NYC… what are they trying to destroy
JFK before his assassination, on trying to stop the secret societies
THE PENTAGON FAILED AUDIT 5 TIMES, THEY HAVE GAPING HOLES
The Pentagon avoided federally mandated audits for 25 years, but that didn't stop the truth from coming out that there had been over $21 TRILLION of unaccounted-for financial adjustments over 17 years.
There are currently 15+ ex-FBI/CIA agents working at Twitter RIGHT NOW at executive positions
Meta (Facebook) has over 60+ ex-FBI/CIA agents
Media platforms have become nothing but enforcement arms for FBI, CIA, NSA, DHS, CDC, FDA, DOD, DOE etc.
The CIA murdered JFK and like @RobertKennedyJr says, this is the most courageous newscast in 60 years from which US machine was run by #DeepState behind the scenes. They don’t care who the president & VP are, they further their own interests
FBI is corrupt to the core, misusing taxpayers dollars to suppress speech for the same taxpayers while leaving glaring cases unsolved like Epstein clients, child trafficking, Biden’s laptop, Larry Nassar etc.
The acronym "DOGE" "Democrats Officially Getting Exposed." It is used to imply that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the administration of President Donald Trump, is revealing or exposing alleged inefficiencies, fraud, and corruption supposedly linked to Democratic policies or government operations they've been in charge of or supported.
🚩Fraudulent Activities Uncovered by DOGE:
1. Improper Payments at the Treasury Department:
- DOGE has claimed that payment approval officers at the Treasury Department were instructed to approve payments indiscriminately, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups.
2. USAID Operations:
- DOGE has been involved in the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), asserting that it is rife with fraud and waste. Specific claims include the agency funding projects like a DEI musical in Ireland and transgender opera in Colombia.
3. Access to Sensitive Government Systems:
- There are reports of DOGE gaining access to sensitive data, including Treasury payment systems, which could involve personal financial information of citizens.
4. Alleged Waste in Federal Spending:
- DOGE has announced savings, such as canceling over $1 billion in federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) contracts, suggesting these were wasteful or fraudulent expenditures.
5. General Claims of Fraud and Abuse:
- Broad assertions have been made by DOGE about uncovering "massive fraud, abuse, money laundering, and corruption" within government operations, though specifics beyond the above examples are less detailed in public reports.
The global financial system is extraordinarily sensitive to the pronouncements of the Federal Reserve's chief due to the pivotal role the U.S. dollar plays in international trade and finance. As the world's reserve currency, fluctuations in U.S. monetary policy directly influence global liquidity, interest rates, and economic stability. When the Fed chair speaks, whether it's about interest rate decisions, inflation targets, or economic outlooks, markets around the globe adjust in anticipation or reaction. Investors, from Wall Street to the smallest foreign exchange traders, scrutinize every word for hints of policy shifts that could affect asset valuations, currency strength, and investment strategies. This reliance stems from the understanding that changes in U.S. policy can ripple through economies worldwide, affecting everything from commodity prices to international borrowing costs.
This dependency is further amplified by the psychological impact of the Fed's statements. The markets operate on a blend of hard data and human emotion, where confidence or uncertainty can sway economic directions significantly. The Federal Reserve's chief, therefore, not only sets the tone for economic policy but also manages market psychology. A mere suggestion of tightening or easing monetary policy can lead to immediate market movements, as traders and investors adjust their portfolios to hedge against perceived risks or capitalize on new opportunities. This dynamic creates a self-fulfilling prophecy where the Fed's words can shape economic reality by influencing investor behavior, credit availability, and consumer confidence, often before any actual policy changes are enacted.
Moreover, the absence of a truly global monetary authority makes the Federal Reserve's chair one of the most influential figures in international finance. Other central banks and governments watch closely, often aligning their policies to mitigate or leverage the effects of U.S. monetary decisions. This isn't merely about following the dollar; it's about navigating the complex web of global economic interdependence where the U.S. economy, due to its size and influence, acts as a linchpin. The Fed's communication strategy, thus, becomes a critical tool not just for domestic policy but for global financial stability. This concentration of influence underscores a system where one person's words can dictate the financial health and economic direction of nations far beyond U.S. borders, highlighting our world's reliance on the Federal Reserve chief's rhetoric.
Here's why systems dominated by certain sectors might inherently fail to achieve broader societal goals:
🚩A Country Run by Banks Will Always Be in Debt:
- **Profit Over Stability:** Banks inherently aim to maximize profit, which often involves lending money and charging interest. This creates a cycle of perpetual debt for the state, as governments need to borrow to fund operations, infrastructure, and crises. The more debt there is, the more interest accumulates, ensuring that the debt never truly diminishes.
- **Economic Dependency:** By controlling financial policies, banks can dictate economic conditions that favor debt accumulation, like low interest rates that encourage borrowing or high inflation rates that devalue currency, increasing the nominal value of debt.
🚩Healthcare Run by Big Pharma Will Never Cure Disease:
- **Financial Incentives:** Curing diseases is less profitable than managing chronic conditions. Big Pharma benefits from long-term treatments where patients need continuous medication, rather than one-time cures which would eliminate future revenue from that ailment.
- **Research Focus:** The pharmaceutical industry's R&D is heavily influenced by potential market size and profitability rather than public health needs, often sidelining research into cures for less common or less profitable diseases.
- **Regulatory Influence:** Through lobbying, big pharma can influence regulations and drug approval processes to favor treatments that don't eradicate diseases but manage symptoms, thus ensuring sustained sales.
🚩A State Run by War Will Never Know Peace:
- **Perpetual Conflict:** Military-industrial complexes thrive on conflict. Wars justify defense budgets, contracts, and arms sales. Peace reduces these opportunities, hence there's an institutional bias towards maintaining some level of tension or conflict.
- **Political Power:** Military leaders or regimes often gain and retain power through war, making peace less appealing as it might lead to a reduction in their control or influence.
- **Economic Dependency:** Economies can become dependent on war industries for jobs and innovation, creating a cycle where peace is economically destabilizing.
🚩A Nation Run by Media Will Never Know the Truth:
- **Profit from Sensationalism:** Media outlets often prioritize sensational, controversial, or divisive content to attract viewership, which can distort facts or omit context for the sake of engagement.
- **Control Over Information:** Media conglomerates can influence public opinion by controlling what information is disseminated, how it's framed, or even by suppressing stories that don't align with their interests or those of their sponsors.
- **Bias and Agenda Setting:** Whether through political alignment, ownership biases, or advertiser influence, media can skew narratives away from objective truth towards narratives that benefit their agendas or maintain viewer loyalty.
In each case, the systemic incentives and structures prioritize outcomes that align with the dominant institution's interests rather than the public good or societal well-being.
The issue of Muslim grooming gangs in Britain involves groups of men, primarily of Pakistani heritage, who were involved in the systematic sexual exploitation of young, mostly white, girls. These crimes took place over several decades, particularly highlighted in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford.
**Nature of the Crimes:**
These gangs would typically target vulnerable young girls, often from disadvantaged backgrounds, using methods such as providing gifts, alcohol, or drugs to manipulate and control them. The abuse included rape, trafficking, and other forms of sexual exploitation, often occurring in a group setting where girls were passed among multiple men for abuse.
**Scale of Impact:**
While exact numbers are difficult to ascertain due to the scale and historical nature of these crimes, various reports suggest:
- In Rotherham alone, an independent inquiry estimated around 1,400 children were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. However, some sources suggest that the total number of victims across the UK could reach into the tens of thousands over the span of decades.
- In Telford, one investigation suggested that over 1,000 girls could have been affected over several decades.
**Cover-up Allegations:**
The allegations of cover-ups primarily involve:
- **Police**: Concerns have been raised that the police were reluctant to act due to fears of being perceived as racist or stirring up racial tensions. This hesitation led to insufficient action, with some victims' complaints being dismissed or not taken seriously. There were instances where police officers reportedly did not pursue leads or investigations because they were concerned about community relations or accusations of racial profiling.
- **Labour Party Politicians**: Critics argue that Labour politicians, particularly in areas with significant minority populations, were aware of these crimes but prioritized community cohesion and electoral considerations over addressing the abuse. There have been accusations that local councils, often led by Labour, downplayed or ignored the ethnic dimension of these crimes to avoid accusations of racism, thereby failing the victims.
- **Silence and Inaction**: The term "political correctness" has often been cited as a reason for the silence, where fear of backlash for highlighting the ethnicity of the perpetrators led to systemic failures. This included not only inaction but also in some cases, active suppression of information or downplaying the severity of the incidents.
**Public and Political Response:**
The issue has become politically charged, with debates over the extent to which ethnicity played a role in both the crimes and the cover-up. There has been criticism from various political quarters about the handling of these cases, with calls for more accountability, better policing strategies, and cultural changes within communities to address such issues.
The response from both police and political figures has evolved over time, with more recent commitments to tackle these issues head-on, including the establishment of task forces to investigate grooming gangs. However, the historical mishandling remains a point of contention and has been used in political discourse to critique the approach of past administrations and local governance.