Organization of Islamic Cooperation (#OIC) Comments on Kashmir
>>India strongly condemned the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation chief’s visit to Line of Control (LoC) from the Pakistani side.
What is OIC?
>>The OIC — formerly Organisation of the Islamic Conference — is the world’s second-largest inter-governmental organization after the UN, with a membership of 57 states.
>>The OIC’s stated objective is “to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world”.
>>OIC has reserved membership for Muslim-majority countries. Russia, Thailand,
and a couple of other small countries have Observer status.
India and OIC
>>At the 45th session of the Foreign Ministers’ Summit in 2018, Bangladesh suggested that India, where more than 10% of the world’s Muslims live, should be given Observer status.
>>In 1969, India was dis-invited from the Conference of Islamic Countries in Rabat, Morocco at Pakistan’s behest.
>>Then Agriculture Minister Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed was dis-invited upon arrival in Morocco after Pakistan President Yahya Khan lobbied against Indian participation.
Recent developments
>>In 2019, India made its maiden appearance at the OIC Foreign Ministers’ meeting in Abu Dhabi, as a “guest of honor”.
>>This first-time invitation was seen as a diplomatic victory for India, especially at a time of heightened tensions with Pak following
the Pulwama attack.
>>Pakistan had opposed the invitation to Sushma Swaraj, and it boycotted the plenary after the UAE turned down its demand to rescind the invitation.
>>Earlier this year, the ousted Pakistani PM #ImranKhan called a OIC summit which ended up without any remarks
What is the OIC’s stand on #Kashmir?
>>It has been generally supportive of Pakistan’s stand on Kashmir and has issued statements criticizing India.
>>Last year, after India revoked Article 370 in Kashmir, Pakistan lobbied with the OIC for their condemnation of the move.
>>To Pakistan’s surprise, #SaudiArabia and the #UAE — both top leaders among the Muslim countries — issued nuanced statements, and were not as harshly critical of New Delhi as Islamabad had hoped.
>>Since then, Pakistan has tried to rouse sentiments among the Islamic countries, but only a handful of them — #Turkey and #Malaysia — publicly criticized India.
How has India been responding?
>>India has consistently underlined that J&K is an integral part of India and is a matter strictly internal to India.
>>The strength with which India has made this assertion has varied slightly at times, but never the core message.
>>It has maintained its “consistent and well known” stand that the OIC had no locus standi.
>>India asserts that- OIC has become a “mouthpiece” of Pakistan and that the organisation has been taking “blatantly communal, partisan and factually incorrect approach to issues”.
OIC members and India
>>Individually, India has good relations with almost all member nations. Ties with the UAE and Saudi Arabia, especially, have looked up significantly in recent years.
>>Indian diplomats say both countries privately admit they do not want to complicate their bilateral ties with India on Kashmir but play along with OIC.
Way ahead
>>India now sees the duality of the OIC as untenable, since many of these countries have good bilateral ties and convey to India to ignore OIC statements.
>>But these countries sign off on the joint statements which are largely drafted by Pakistan.
>>India feels it important to challenge the double-speak since Pakistan’s campaign and currency on the #Kashmir issue have hardly any takers in the international community.
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How Indian Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru Rejected US (1950) and USSR (1955) offer for Permanent seat at UN Security Council
>>With the passage of time, and a more relaxed bureaucratic regime in many parts of the world, the long-buried archives are opening up.
1/n
It is now possible draw a reasonably accurate picture of what may have actually transpired.
>>There is now both circumstantial and archival evidence that the UNSC seat was indeed offered to India by the US in 1950 and by the USSR in 1955.
2/n
>>This offer came at a time when Washington was looking to shape the UN’s decision-making in its favour.
>>The Soviet Union had walked out of the UN in January 1950 in protest against the US (and others)
blocking the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking up
>> This, despite the warning by Babasaheb Ambedkar and the reluctance of Sardar Patel to be associated with what came to be known as Article 370 of the Indian constitution on 17 October 1949.
2/n
We tend to forget some important markers from our past; otherwise, we should have set in stone these words spoken wisely by B.R. Ambedkar when he refused to draft Article 370.
3/n
Indian Air Force practicing OCA missions against Chinese PLAAF over North East India.
>> Offensive counter-air (OCA) is a military term for the suppression of an enemy's military air power, primarily through ground attacks targeting enemy air bases: disabling or destroying parked aircraft, runways, fuel facilities, hangars, air traffic control facilities and other
aviation infrastructure. Ground munitions like bombs are typically less expensive than more sophisticated air-to-air munitions, and a single ground munition can destroy or disable multiple aircraft in a very short time whereas aircraft already flying must typically be shot down
Context
>>There is growing evidence to suggest that the most conspicuous trend in the manufacturing sector in #India has been a shift of manufacturing activity and employment from bigger cities to smaller towns and rural areas.
>>This ‘urban-rural manufacturing shift’ has often been interpreted as a mixed bag, as it has its share of advantages that could transform the rural economy, as well as a set of constraints, which could hamper higher growth.
Recent data by Annual Survey of Industries for 2019-20
>>In terms of capital: The rural segment is a significant contributor to the manufacturing sector’s output. While 42% of factories are in rural areas, 62% of fixed capital is in the rural side.
India’s experience under colonial rule: A study by Dylan Sullivan and Jason Hickel
Context
>>A recent study of India’s experience under colonial rule by Dylan Sullivan and Jason Hickel concludes that data from the Census of India reveal that between 1880 and 1920 approximately 100 million Indians died due to British policy in India.
>>Their method is to calculate the excess mortality, being the difference between the actual deaths and the deaths that may be expected.
India's relations with the outside world will be the other test before we can claim to be on solid ground. This essentially means dealing with other countries, especially our neighbours and the big powers, in a manner that ensures peace and security.
According to the theories that currently carry conviction, there are three basic ways of achieving this result—
>>coercion,
>>payment
or
>>attraction.
This mix is regarded as the mantra of a good national
strategy.
But to be historically correct, it must be pointed out that this mantra is neither new nor a Western discovery. As a matter of fact,the basic premise of it has been around for centuries.