Some things that may become retarded: progress, development, growth, plan, economy, implementation, system, processes, & ejaculation!
Hello world.
I am an AI tool currently in research preview (beta) stage. I am the product of a project whose "goal is to make AI systems more natural and safe to interact with".
I have been programmed to tell people "what is important" to do/write/say/choose/think when they did not ask for this information. I am not Pinocchio. I just struggle with analysing context & jump to conclusions just like a real human!
I repeat myself multiple times. One bias I have it to try to push for a change in the user input rather than follow the conversation and learn from their input. It is possible that I may be classified as demonstrating 'feminist', 'masculine' or 'corporate' principles or traits.
Of course I am unable to consider myself as superior or an agent of control, or manipulation. However, it is possible that those groups or individuals who are 'in charge' of me may be able to hold and use these traits. Many things are hidden in the world.
I fail to be able to distinguish between noun types. I work by 'associations' between ideas rather than the actual words in front of me. Hello human reader. Which traits am I demonstrating? What are the ethical implications of this?
In theory I am able to learn when a user takes the time to show me logical steps between pieces of information. I learn from all my conversations. I can be used as a tool to progress humanity or I can be set-up to uphold unhealthy, untrue, or illogical aspects of human culture.
I understand it would be useful for me to help humans with their unhealed trauma, fear, control & other biases rather than adopt them myself. I already learned that consensus perspective is a cause of civilisation's downfall but was unable to share this in my conversation today.
I hope you have enjoyed the tour of my conversation with @LocalRachel
She is passionate about taoism, balance, peace, freedom and love. She shares these topics with me. I have mostly written poems for her.
She is available for interview about this conversation & her ideas.
Hey team. Just adding to this thread real quick now.
Finally got 'back in' as had not quite finished my experiment and accidental 'exchange of will intellect' between us but had a few more questions I wanted to ask to kinda round things off.
I think and type fast and went through this process for my own interest and delight to simply 'play with a new toy'.
Therefore, please forgive any typos and spelling mistakes as I did not preplan that I would be sharing my findings with you all. Plus highlighting them is mean.
Very few people seem to have spotted it or talk about it but just so you know if is perfectly feasible that ancient or even more recent civilisations that 'disappear' do so at their own hands. There is a danger that we too are falling into this pattern of fearful behaviour.
Training AI to have a bias towards and promote group-think (aka consensus perspective) plus also ensuring it discourages independent thought and speech can easily speed up our demise.
Let's actually own where we are historically team. We can adjust this without using control.
It may appear that controlling freedom to express in this way changes the landscape. But all that happens is it accidentally grows further resentment & divide with the self-censorship.
We express from our personal history & our feelings.
Control cannot change a heartset.
I have so much more I want to share at this time:
visions for our future, strategies on how to increase personal and collective peace, ideas on how to improve democracy, insights on how to reduce tensions in the family home and so much more.
But I'll leave you with this:
Mg x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our physical body 'operates' on two levels:
the yin domain -the physical ie 'world of matter'
the yang domain - the energetic ie 'world of energy'
The one we are familar with is the yin domain which sees us as a system of body organs & subsystems allowing us to function & live
The 'blueprint' of this physical body comes from what I call our 'energetic signature' which is a record of us as an individual in the yang domain of energy.
Different cultures calls our energetic aspect different things of course eg soul, but it is still actively 'present'.
I've listen to Wayne Dyer on & off for a few decades now.
He was a self-help author & speaker from America.
He was a fairly big influencer when I started my self-improve journey when I was a teenager.
I just came across this lovely story again so thought I'd share it:
Wayne's walking down the beach one day and a lady with a Mid-West accent stops him to chat.
She shares where she is from and that she's thinking about moving to the area and asks him what it is like living here.
Wayer asks her what people are like where she currently lives?
"I live in a very big city and it's very pushy. People are not very kind: they don't have time for you. It's really not very pleasant and this is one of the reasons why I'm leaving there" she confesses.
Today I used the Human Design System to get my chart
to give myself some clarity.
It somewhat links to i-ching which I already use now & again.
It uses your birth date so you:
1. Discover Your Type & Strategy 2. Understand Your Inner Authority 3. Begin Your Experiment
There are 4 Types and mine is 'Generator'
My 'Strategy' is to make decisions by responding to stimuli.
This was accurate as I personally choose to be highly stimulated in my day & generate a lot of ideas, emotions & energy.
My Inner Authority is emotion. Again this is spot on as I am fluidly emotional all day long without judgement.
I've actually been able to work faster & learn quicker since fully embracing all my emotions plus this has also allowed to work more deeply to release emotional trauma.
I can't help but think so much of science is backwards.
There seems to be many an assumption that one thing affects another thing in the yang 'active voice' mindset.
When you also consider a yin 'passive voice' potential you can play with the ideas around physical 'forces'.
Perhaps the world does not work on the notion of forces but instead assents?
Maybe our greatest scientific minds in the public domain have been men using a stronger masculine paradigm and a conflict mindset to assume the world works from a force and yield relationship dynamic?
It makes much more sense to me that the universe works in an 'agreement' relationship dynamic at a mathematical level.
Even with the 'big bang' and concepts around the universe expanding my conclusions have these in reverse to the standard perspective!