I'd like to return to this subject a bit—this strange business of how "movement #conservatism" in the United States, by which I mean the lethal strain of reactionary #Christian theocracy that infests the current Republican Party, puts such an enormous value on *feelings*.

(1/x)
it's strange, because not one American reactionary—not @loganclarkhall, not @thomaschattwill or @shadihamid, not a single propagandist at @NRO or @AEI or @FRCdc—will ever admit to being motivated by anything other than pristine, sparkling _logic_. it's part of the costume.

(2/x)
the @GOP and its partisans have been practicing this pose for *decades* now. William Buckley—a coarse, vulgar, thoroughly ignorant man who was good at sounding erudite when a camera was running—was typical of the new "rationalist" pose in right-wing American politics.

(3/x)
it is easy for any mediocrity, any tenth-rate scam artist or city councilperson, to imitate the "look and feel" of an intellectual. even @jordanbpeterson was once able to manage it, though eventually the mask slipped clean off.

"logical" can be a pose, a practiced act.

(4/x)
there's lots of shortcuts, tips and tricks for sounding "rational" and "scientific" even when you don't know what you're talking about.

believe it or not, this is an old problem. as @jordanbpeterson may or may not recall, this was the topic of Aristophanes's "The Clouds".

(5/x)
Aristophanes, the premier comedic playwright of ancient Athens, was an outsider to the lofty and profound society of Greek philosophy; he passed through this society memorably in Plato's "Symposium" (and presumably Xenophon's "Symposium", which we have not read.)

(6/x) bust of Aristophanes, bearing his name in Greek capitals
thanks to the effervescent activities of the great Greek philosophers, almost every citizen of Athens picked up some smattering of the stuff. any Athenian could learn a rhetorical trick or two from the masters—a handy weapon for getting the best in an argument or a debate.

(7/x)
in other words, Athenian society became, in its little intellectual bubble, something like the modern Internet: brimful with clever people who learned to play treacherous games with words and concepts—who mastered the art of *mimicking* the form of logical argumentation.

(8/x)
the general term for this sort of imitation-argumentation—argumentation meant to *prolong* arguments, so as to "win" those arguments simply by wearying the opponent until they drop—is _sophistry_.

Aristophanes didn't like it. I feel that's a safe enough guess about him.

(9/x)
at any rate he wrote a funny play about a man named Strepsiades who wants to slip out from under his debts, so he goes to sophistry school where he's instructed by the finest man around: none other than Socrates, who appears in the play in a basket dangling from a rope.

(10/x)
the pedantic may point out that Socrates was (at least in Plato's reckoning) an honest and sincere philosopher, who didn't accept money in exchange for teaching. and maybe it was unfair of Aristophanes to imply that Socrates was some mere huckster teaching tricks.

(11/x)
we may not like the idea that Aristophanes was equating Socrates to...well, the ancient Athenian equivalent of @benshapiro.

but let's be blunt: Socrates must have used tricks of argumentation to get out of social obligations *all the time*. he must have been infuriating.

(12/x)
sophistry—the art of prolonging arguments and debates indefinitely, via specious and deceptive use of rhetoric—is the daily bread of #conservative discourse. Ben "FACTS and LOGIC" Shapiro is a famous practitioner, but they're all like that. @loganclarkhall is like that.

(13/x)
everyone @loganclarkhall says he admires is undoubtedly *like that*: deceptive persons, well-practiced in intellectual sophistry, people adept at keeping "debate" forever rolling even on discredited concepts like eugenics or global-warming denialism or "gender criticism".

(14/x)
George Orwell's "duckspeak", from his novel "1984", is like a decay product of prolonged and determined sophistry.

all meaning and substance departs from the rhetoric, which becomes more hackneyed, more *memetic* in nature, until it can be uttered almost _automatically_.

(15/x)
because false "debate", bad-faith debate that's intended to go on forever without conclusive results, is still *useful* in a way even though its intellectual content is nil: sophistical, endless debate can be used for _emotional manipulation_. it's a method of propaganda.

(16/x)
there's nothing particularly *persuasive*, in logical terms, about a sophistical line of argumentation that never comes to an end—but one can try to persuade through *emotions*.

most "#conservative" arguments are, in fact, mere appeals to emotion.

(17/x)
@jordanbpeterson makes little sense when he talks but that doesn't matter as long as the audience *feels* that they're hearing a great mind with great thoughts. @benshapiro talks rubbish but he's so rapid-fire in delivery, he gives the _impression_ of rhetorical command.

(18/x)
a lot of this is basic #sales technique: "high pressure sales tactics" are all about sophistical argumentation, tricking the other person into agreeing to things simply because they're too flustered or too angry to see that they've been deceived until it's too late.

(19/x)
#sales and #marketing methods are also the methods of propaganda. in fact there's likely no real difference between the term "propaganda" and the term "marketing materials"—both are media calculated to deceive and manipulate the audience, yielding "manufactured consent".

(20/x)
@mtaibbi's political propaganda is also #marketing himself—it's his "personal brand" as an "independent journalist" he's trying to hard-sell the American people, even though he's plainly a mere stooge in some plot involving the @GOP and @elonmusk to politicize @Twitter.

(21/x)
@TheDemocrats are hardly innocent of this, but they've been less effective, because the Democrats have tried as hard as possible *not* to appeal to the baser emotions in their marketing. the @GOP have no such scruples. they've weaponized every single American #fear.

(22/x)
there's a reason that right-wing propaganda is always talking about #fear—it's because the propagandists themselves are always frightened. @MattWalshBlog is terrified now and always.

how does he deal with his fears?

he tries, as best he can, to heap them on US.

~Mona Drafter

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pnictogen Horses

Pnictogen Horses Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PnictogenHorses

Jan 27
#loyalty.

loyalty is prized most by the habitually disloyal, just as love is craved most by the unloving and unlovable. @mtaibbi's new friend, @realDonaldTrump, is infamously treacherous and prone to backstabbing his associates—therefore, he demands constant loyalty.

(1/x)
loyalty is an expression of #trust. if you are loyal to someone, you trust them implicitly, i.e. without needing to affirm the trust in words—remember this, when dealing with anyone (say, a bad boss like @elonmusk) who is constantly demanding explicit promises of loyalty.

(2/x)
true #loyalty does not need to be tested or propped up constantly with ritualistic affirmations and extraction of promises to be loyal.

there is a *false* loyalty, that bears some superficial resemblance to true loyalty; it's the enforced loyalty of a criminal conspiracy.

(3/x)
Read 20 tweets
Jan 27
Western civilization has failed.

there's no way to avoid this. #COVID19 proved to be the "final straw", as they say—the West's general response to the challenge of the Covid19 pandemic was to abandon its commitment to public health. the next pandemic will scythe us down.

(1/x)
the breakdown in the West's ability to respond to crises of disease has been ongoing—many decades in the making.

#capitalism has been corroding and corrupting the apparatus of Western health care, especially in the United States, which became a vast reservoir of #COVID19.

(2/x)
the needs of *public health*—measures to ensure that ALL inhabitants of a nation receive some acceptable minimum of medical care of all sorts, including mental health care—conflict with the needs of #capitalism: the more _profitable_ #medicine is, the more costly it is.

(3/x)
Read 20 tweets
Jan 26
the ideal economy, under #capitalism, produces absolutely nothing.

this may sound ridiculous, but it is no more ridiculous than the central assumptions of capitalism, which begin with the assumption that only people who *own* factories ought to make any money from them.

(1/x)
capitalism is absurd, but in a sense that's been a boon for capitalists: because it's impossible to make sense of things that are fundamentally absurd no matter how much energy you expend on trying to explain them, #capitalism's absurdity helps generate its own propaganda.

(2/x)
it is rather like attempting to defend the British monarchy on rational grounds. the monarchy is a vestigial horror, an open wound in the side of the British body politic‚ an endless drain on the public coffers and an ongoing publicity nightmare—but that's also a *plus*.

(3/x)
Read 24 tweets
Jan 25
the modern "#conservative" movement, the right wing of American politics, is fundamentally about the primacy of emotions over reason.

of course that's not something that right-wing politicians and pundits will ever admit openly. @MattWalshBlog pretends to be "rational".

(1/x)
Western society exalts itself as the sole embodiment of reason and logic and science on Earth; even mere #Christian bigots like @dalepartridge or @jordanbpeterson have taught themselves to pretend that their bigotries—and indeed their religious assertions—are "logical".

(2/x)
this is an easy trick for human beings to manage.

any human being can be taught to stick, without ever yielding, to an assertion—however absurd the assertion is. "@jordanbpeterson is logical and rational" is an absurd assertion but Mr. Peterson and his fans stick by it.

(3/x)
Read 22 tweets
Jan 25
there's a legalistic definition of "sanity" that runs something like, "sanity is when a human being can tell right from wrong".

in other words, "sanity" in this legalistic view is equated with *morality*. to be "insane", by this rule, is to be incapable of moral behavior.

(1/x)
there's many reasons why I myself detest this equation of sanity with morality—in general, the demands of Western "criminal justice" have exerted an insidious corrupting influence upon #psychology and #psychiatry, warping them into tools for oppression and incarceration.

(2/x)
but the chief problem with "sanity = morality" is that it's absurd and contradictory. one may be insane and still moral; one may be sane and immoral.

and it's *this phenomenon* I wish to discuss here: the sane, immoral person. the @dalepartridge, the @MattWalshBlog.

(3/x)
Read 24 tweets
Jan 25
there's a famous novel that amounts to a scathing indictment of reactionary #Christian values. those values are shown to be incompatible with a free and happy society. instead they lead to grinding toil, squalor, surveillance, and violent punishment for trivial heresies.

(1/x)
I refer of course to George Orwell's novel "1984", in which #Christianity plays a fascinating role. it's not *absent*, even though the leaden tyranny of "Big Brother" is nominally atheistic. in "1984", Christianity creeps round the edges—and it's a tool for the oppressors.

(2/x)
let's start with Carrington, the undercover "Thought Police" officer who tricks first Winston Smith, then Julia, with his imitation of a dotty curio-shop owner.

Carrington plays his part superbly. probably he's genuinely fond of his junk store, even though it's a "prop".

(3/x)
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(