loyalty is prized most by the habitually disloyal, just as love is craved most by the unloving and unlovable. @mtaibbi's new friend, @realDonaldTrump, is infamously treacherous and prone to backstabbing his associates—therefore, he demands constant loyalty.
(1/x)
loyalty is an expression of #trust. if you are loyal to someone, you trust them implicitly, i.e. without needing to affirm the trust in words—remember this, when dealing with anyone (say, a bad boss like @elonmusk) who is constantly demanding explicit promises of loyalty.
(2/x)
true #loyalty does not need to be tested or propped up constantly with ritualistic affirmations and extraction of promises to be loyal.
there is a *false* loyalty, that bears some superficial resemblance to true loyalty; it's the enforced loyalty of a criminal conspiracy.
(3/x)
members of a criminal gang need to stick by each other but the reason isn't spiritual kinship or mutual trust; it's mutual *distrust*. any one member of the gang (e.g. the @GOP, or the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @bariweiss gang) is capable of betraying and breaking the group.
(4/x)
American right-wing politics is dominated by extremist #Christianity, and Christians habitually pretend to be the only people in the Universe who esteem noble values and morals; #loyalty is just such a lofty principle. but their esteem for morality has no real substance.
(5/x)
the typical right-wing #Christian into @GOP politics—the @dalepartridge / @MikeLitterous4U sort of "Christian"—is a profoundly *immoral* person: greedy, deceitful, cruel, intensely bıgoted. they're bullies who look for society's weakest, and kick them while they're down.
(6/x)
such persons have totally internalized the vicious, self-interested, worldly values of social climbing and #business success. in this domain, it's "kill or be killed", and nothing matters more than personal survival and personal gain. #loyalty is impossible in this world.
(7/x)
how can loyalty even exist in a cutthroat society where the weak are mere food for the strong? a weak person (@mtaibbi, say) would be a fool to promise loyalty to a stronger person (@elonmusk or @realDonaldTrump) since the stronger party has no reason to honor the promise.
(8/x)
@elonmusk or @realDonaldTrump, if they ever got to suspecting that @mtaibbi was a liability to them (or was likely to turn coat), would sacrifice Taibbi in a heartbeat: survival comes first, #loyalty be damned.
this is one reason *cults of personality* exist.
(9/x)
a rational actor wouldn't dream for a second that @realDonaldTrump or @elonmusk were capable of true loyalty. they would reach the same conclusion that I have said: "this person can only be loyal to himself, never to his underlings." so how can Musk or Trump gain loyalty?
(10/x)
the answer is that @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk both appeal to _irrational_ forces. they seek the completely unthinking, heedless loyalty of a cultist to a cult leader, someone who presents himself as humanity's sole saviour. Musk and Trump pretend to be *prophets*.
(11/x)
I have no idea if @mtaibbi himself believes in @elonmusk's message of technological salvation, or @realDonaldTrump's message of...whatever. but let's say, for the purpose of argument, that he's a true Musky believer.
*disloyalty* would now be unthinkable for Taibbi.
(12/x)
breaking faith with @elonmusk would now have the nature of a *sin*, a vile heresy. the values of #Christianity still pervade American society in secularized forms; people still think in terms of sin and heresy. @mtaibbi might feel that abandoning @elonmusk was *immoral*.
(13/x)
(I am amused at the thought of @mtaibbi pretending to have moral scruples, but I digress.)
@elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump and other crooks who have surrounded themselves with cultlike admirers go to great lengths to *frighten* their followers into keeping the faith.
(14/x)
Musk and Trump both picture themselves as the Future, glittering and full of plenty; outside the sphere of their benign influence, there's only darkness and chaos and the gnashing of teeth. #Christians are very familiar with this talk; non-Christians freely imitate it.
(15/x)
I myself do not think that a man as relentlessly self-interested as @mtaibbi is a true believer in @elonmusk or @realDonaldTrump; in fact I think he's likely to regard these people as inferior to him. they have what he now needs, but he hopes in future to do without them.
(16/x)
hence if any #loyalty cements @mtaibbi to the @elonmusk / @bariweiss / @GOP conspiracy to use @Twitter to smear @TheDemocrats, it's going to be the purely negative sort—the loyalty of a criminal gang, the "loyalty" of mutually assured destruction. a slip could be fatal.
(17/x)
undoubtedly @elonmusk (and the @GOP figures whom @mtaibbi is doing errands for) have some hold over Taibbi. probably he's a drug addict; there's also tales of past sexual assaults. incidentally, this keeping of *dirt* on members is also typical of cults like @Scientology.
(18/x)
the cult leaders extract *confessions* of past sins from their members, then threaten to blackmail wayward members with them. let us hope for @mtaibbi's sake that he isn't bound to @elonmusk in such a fashion.
#capitalism and capitalists' fortunes are built on this practice. all the free-flowing #business and #finance propaganda, churned out in huge volumes for the edification of persons who've devoted themselves to #money, talks about _investing_.
the great bulk of money made in #capitalism goes only to the ownership class; the toilers below them get pennies. those unable to toil get *less* than nothing—capitalism wants such people to be liquidated, hence @charlesmurray and @EPoe187 cook up rationales for doing so.
(2/x)
ultimately this is *why* #eugenics and "scientific racism" exists at all: #capitalism needs some pseudointellectual justification for marginalizing and liquidating all human beings who are unable or *unwilling* to toil for capitalism. this is WHY @Quillette is well-funded.
my sense of self isn't dependent upon outsiders' scorn; in any case, I'm quite content to be regarded as a mere figment of a crazy person's imagination. that's little impediment to my life and purpose in the Pnictogen Wing.
(1/x)
I daresay that I'm unusually *practical* for a unicorn. my interests are mundane ones; I like science and engineering and working in shops and keeping things running as smoothly as possible, and while I'm no atheist or positivist, I leave magic and religion to others.
(2/x)
all the same—it's a painful thing, being a unicorn in a world that has attempted to *wipe out* creativity and mysticism and magic—a world that embraces cruelty and casual sneers at suffering and death. I may have been ethereal once; I am not, now.
let's talk about the GC cult for a bit, and the nature of their logical fallacies. for their "gender criticism" is in fact illogical, no matter how many times @Docstockk or @bindelj or @FondOfBeetles (or, heaven help us, "biology expert" @jk_rowling) blither about science.
"gender criticism" coexists with all other forms of bigotry, because all forms of bigotry are essentially _the same_: they all depend on the same crucial fallacy.
the fallacy is that a human being has no individual identity beyond a *mere classification of their traits*.
(2/x)
@bindelj, @HJoyceGender, and all the rest of the GC cult leaders sneer at the notions of identity and self-identification because they are fascısts, and they wish to erase individuality from the human population. they want human beings to be regards as parts of a machine.
I do feel there's something more to be said (while the iron is hot, so to speak) about #cryptocurrency and the question of how presumably intelligent #computer and #programming professionals (not to mention the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi crowd) could possibly have fallen for it.
the *allure* is obvious enough; it's the same allure that's in looking for legendary pirate treasure, or prospecting for gold. you're hoping for more than just some #money—you're hoping that for enough to *set you up for life*. all monetary worries, permanently erased.
(2/x)
that's one of the reason that it's so important to interrogate the #ElonMusk crowd about Musk's blood-emerald dealings, and what the *truth* was about Musk's family striking it rich—it's likely that Musk simply lost the ability thenceforth to think in realistic terms.
let's try again. I wanted to write more *specifically* about Mr. @elonmusk—speculating about why he's the catastrophic person he is, based on what's popularly known about him. everything I'm going to mention is something reported in the popular press (not by @mtaibbi.)
we know that Mr. Musk had an abusive father, whom @elonmusk has had little good to say about. the man was typical colonialist trash—a South African grifter and speculator who *got lucky*, making a lot of money quickly with a partial share in an apartheid-era emerald mine.
(2/x)
Mr. Musk (and certainly his #ElonMusk fan club) has tried as hard as possible to suppress any chatter about the emerald mine; Mr. @elonmusk himself, a prolific and habitual liar, has even tried to pretend that the press made it up. but it's too broadly reported to deny.
at some point, *someone* is going to have to investigate THE question of the age, which is...
...just *why* is @elonmusk as disastrous as he is?
why is #ElonMusk a phenomenon? how on Earth did practically everyone in corporate #media and #journalism fall for this man?
(1/x)
@mtaibbi or @lhfang might have inquired into this matter, at some hypothetical time in the past when they cared about #journalism rather than careerism and selling out to whoever offered the sparkliest vision of the future—maybe that time was *never*, truth be told.
(2/x)
what does it even mean to be a "real journalist"? how can that be defined? one can be tolerably certain, at any rate, that whatever @mtaibbi or @lhfang or @Timcast or @bariweiss ever *used* to be in the past—if that dream was ever noble, it's long ago dissolved into smoke.