Thread by @Jikkyleaks

New stinky cheese 🧀🧀🧀
Don't you just love the @UKHSA?

Not only have they delayed publishing #pregnancy data after June 2022 in the latest vaccine surveillance report but they are gaslighting you about the #stillbirth rates.

Here's the chart:
@1979pop @ClareCraigPath

Here are the figures
No doses of vaccine in pregnancy = 3.76 per 1000
One+ dose in pregnancy = 3.3 per 100
95% confidence intervals do not cross.
A significant increase then, right?

Wrong...

There was another piece of information missing which was buried further in the report.

Minority groups had a 25% lower uptake of vaccination

Why is that important?

The overall stillbirth rate in 2019 was 3.35 per 1000 - about the same as the "vaccinated" group.
But the stillbirth rate for black and "Asian" (UK terminology for Pakistani-Indian ethnic groups) was 5-7 per 100,000
bbc.com/news/health-58…

These groups were over-represented in the "unvaccinated" stillbirth rate and under-represented in the "vaccinated" stillbirth rate.

Stillbirth rates for white ethnicity groups was 3.22 per 100,000 - 3 points lower

So, because the "vaccinated" groups had a much higher proportion of the "low stillbirth rate" ethnic groups (by 25%), that is enough of a confounder to account for the all the difference (0.46 per 100,000) between the groups.

Src: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Notably the report has also stopped publishing data for births - presumably because the drop in births is so dramatic between before and after the vaccine rollout.

A significant 13% drop (p=0.004, i.e. the probability that this is a chance finding is 4 in 1000)
@ichudov

This table has not been updated since October 2022 - 4 months ago

Why?

Why can we not access the raw data behind this report?
And why did you not update this table to October 2022?

Something to hide?
@ONS @SarahCaul_ONS

The @ONS and @UKHSA has deliberately obfuscated and conflated data.

They refuse to allow you access to all the data that you paid for and instead allow conflicted authors like @Vnafilyan and @KamleshKhunti to publish unverifiable papers using your data.

Here's the question:

If your vaccine is so good, why are you not allowing the public access to the data that is behind the reports?

The govt tell us "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear"

Well, it's your turn @UKHSA.
Hand it over.

openrightsgroup.org/blog/respondin…

POLL: for those who have got through to the end of this thread

Should a public inquiry into the role of the ONS and UKHSA in the selective publishing of COVID data be instituted, with criminal prosecution for #malfeasance for any wrongdoing uncovered?

NB typo in this tweet: should be per 1000, not per 100,000

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1624317498865905664

Note all the stillbirth rates in the posts should be per 1000 live births. Apologies for typos