1/ With the recent depeg of @Platypusdefi's $USP and FUD around $BUSD, I dived deep into @y2kfinance, a DeFi protocol on @arbitrum. A thread on the protocol mechanism and the $Y2K token 🧵
2/ One of the roles of financial markets is to transfer risk and allocate it efficiently. But there's a gap in the DeFi world when it comes to hedging against stablecoin de-pegging risks.
3/ Y2K Finance is a protocol on #Arbitrum providing avenue for hedging and speculating on pegged asset risks. Users can manage potential deviation of stablecoins, liquid staking derivatives (#LSD), or other wrapped assets from their expected value.
4/ Y2K's Earthquake vaults build on the idea of catastrophe bonds in traditional finance, applying it to a de-peg event for stablecoins and other derivative products in #DeFi. #Y2K doesn't issue insurance products or directly underwrite them, but serves as a facilitator.
5/ Users can use Hedge and Risk Vaults in the Earthquake Module to manage pegged asset risks. 'Hedgers' deposit $ETH as an insurance premium to protect against volatility, while 'Riskoors' underwrite the depeg insurance by depositing $ETH in the Risk Vault.
6/ In case of a depeg event, the Hedgers receive a share of the Risk Vault, while Riskoors receive a portion of the premiums from the Hedge Vault. The vaults' target asset, strike price, epoch, and deposit amount determine their characteristics.
7/ Here's a simple illustration of the protocol's mechanisms:
8/ Since launch in November last year, Y2K has facilitated about 51,000 $ETH (~$80M) in its Earthquake vaults. 95% of the users deposit into the Risk vault, betting that the assets will not depeg.
9/ The protocol collects a 5% fee on the payouts at the end of each epoch. In three months’ time, the protocol has earned about $500K. dune.com/toubi/y2k
10/ Tokenomics: The $Y2K token is used for governing the Y2K ecosystem and setting key parameters. $vlY2K (vote locked Y2K) holders are entitled to 50% of the fees generated.
11/ To obtain $vlY2K, one must provide liquidity to the Y2K-ETH @Balancer pool. This LP token can then be locked for 16 or 32 weeks and is non-transferable. Supplying liquidity in the Balancer pool and locking it for $vlY2K also allows users to increase their governaning power.
12/ In the future, $vlY2K holders are not just getting a slice of the protocol fee, but they'll also have a hand in guiding liquidity mining emissions through a gauge system. This will open up a bribe economy similar to the Curve War.
13/end. For more information on its valuation compared to other Arbitrum protocols, catalysts ahead and potential risks, you can read the full article on @theBlockcrunch.
🧵1/ happy to share my latest article is published in Stanford Blockchain Review (@StanfordCrypto). the article explores a simple question: how does web3 actually increase output?
tldr: it's about 1) Control 2) Liberation 3) Expansion.
everyone is busy so here's a summary 👇
2/ is crypto building something meaningful, or is it just a high-tech casino?
let’s take a step back. most people think of innovation as disruptive: new tech replacing old systems.
joseph schumpeter called this creative destruction. think cars replacing horses or smartphones replacing basic phones. these changes are dramatic, tangible, and easy to measure.
but not all innovation looks like this.
3/ economist ronald coase took a different approach. he focused on institutions which are the rules of the game in society.
institutions reduce transaction costs (the hidden friction in coordination and trust) and enable economic activity.
what are transaction costs? think of buying a house:
1/15
Last month there was an interesting DAO proposal on @LidoFinance by @_skozin. The crux of the proposal argues for introducing a Dual Governance scheme, in which $stETH holders will also be granted governing power in addition to $LDO holders. michaellwy.substack.com/p/ambition-mad…
2/15
In my latest blog, I explore how the Dual Governance scheme resembles the structure of a #bicameral legislature (with specific reference to the U.S. Congress) and inherits the spirit of check and balance to address moral hazards.
3/15
Many parallels between #dual#governance and #bicameralism can be observed: both seek to mitigate the principal-agent problem through better alignment of interests and both seek to limit the power of the governing body by introducing elements of checks and balances.