the unseemly rush to shove @sama / @OpenAI / #ChatGPT "artificial general intelligence" into all our products—whether we want #AGI or not, but capitalists don't really care about our desires, only *their* desires—is put into some perspective: it's rebound from @Meta.

(1/x)
with its uncanny instinct for choosing only *stale* ideas to monetize, the #technology / #programming industry decided—for a while—that the next big high-tech thing that EVERYBODY would be forced to love would be "the #metaverse", which already exists in video games.

(2/x)
it also exists in @SecondLife, and in @nealstephenson and who knows how much other science fiction. people have been running around in computer-animated "avatars", of varying degrees of complexity and detail, for decades. @Meta and #MarkZuckerberg were wheel-reinventing.

(3/x)
but Zuckerberg was undoubtedly applying the same logic that Lee Iacocca applied to @Chrysler and which Steve Jobs impressed upon @Apple. Chrysler didn't invent cars; Steve Jobs didn't invent MP3 players or smart phones. but that didn't matter—only the *image* mattered.

(4/x)
@elonmusk (even though he's a ludicrous joke compared to Iacocca or Jobs) benefits from the same rock-star image. @Tesla didn't invent #ElectricVehicles; @SpaceX didn't invent rocketry. but what matters most is the _rock star_ made them and sold them: the "genius" #CEO.

(5/x)
it's honestly kind of hilarious to think that #MarkZuckerberg and @facebook / @Meta thought they could bank on something similar—there was nothing special about their 3D-avatar thingummy, but they thought that the #Facebook name would carry the project through.

(6/x)
which is *silly* because @facebook is like @Microsoft and @Windows: it's something you use because you're mostly FORCED to use it. it's the thing that's on all the school computers, it's what's in all the workplaces. you don't use Facebook or Windows because you LIKE them.

(7/x)
Windows has zero rock-star appeal (remember Steve Ballmer though? he did try). Facebook was not better off. #MarkZuckerberg is positively fishlike in personal aspect; @facebook / @Meta exists because Zuckerberg did crimes. there was little hope for its #metaverse squib.

(8/x)
you can see why @sama's sort of thingummy won out in the race to some sort of useless but salable "killer app". #capitalism loves "killer apps", whether or not the idea is any good—cf. @elonmusk's fixation on the "X App". #ChatGPT is like a magic glue or fix-it product.

(9/x)
the #metaverse was a big heavy-duty graphical thing, hard to get into, hard to sell—rather like an #MMO that never many customers. (see what I mean about @Meta not really doing anything new?)

but @sama's all-in-one #AGI stuff? use it to patch ANY hole in your enterprise!

(10/x)
it was a far more *salable* idea that made much bigger promises—especially because @sama and the @OpenAI boys, in common with much of the elite #programming set (and the #business and #investment people who gamble on them), think they've created life or something.

(11/x)
I daresay that @sama's purported beliefs about the intelligence of his creations wouldn't prevent him from pulling the plug arbitrarily—after all, Sam Altman IS extremely racist and bigoted, and therefore has no reliable respect for life. except maybe his own.

(12/x)
(I'm not even sure @sama respects @jaltma's life so very much—bigots tend to keep their eyes on the main chance, if you know what I mean. their loyalties are of the tidal kind...they come and go.)

~Chara of Pnictogen

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kris Dreemurr of the Pnictogen Wing (at Large)

Kris Dreemurr of the Pnictogen Wing (at Large) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KrisAtLarge

Mar 5
argh! I forgot the most important bit! because it's about Baldr and Hoðr and Loki—and a very *particular* version of their story, the one that most people know, which comes from Snorri Sturluson and the "Prose Edda" and which then got picked up by English poets.

(1/x)
#CSLewis cites Matthew Arnold's "Balder Dead", a retelling of the story of Baldr's death from the "Prose Edda", as one of his early influences in his semi-autobiographical work "Surprised by Joy".

now I speculate: Jack Lewis probably had Baldr in mind when he converted.

(2/x)
for it's been *noted* that the narrative about Baldr's death from Sturluson's "Prose Edda" is *almost* like the Christian narrative. Baldr is impossibly beautiful and impossibly pure, with amazing powers, then treachery lays him low—but he'll be coming back after Ragnarok!

(3/x)
Read 14 tweets
Mar 5
we still love @JRRTolkien, which is why we detest Peter Jackson so very much—we think he turned one our favorite childhood works of art into coarse crass (and racist) action trash, and for some reason hardly anyone's noticed. I suppose it's a sign we're in the Bad Place™.

(1/x)
it's one of the ill-kept secrets of the modern-day fascıst movement, by the way, that they *adore* the Peter Jackson #LOTR films—people like @MattWalshBlog and @Timcast and @benshapiro have probably watched those trashy movies a thousand times. they're big hits, after all.

(2/x)
and if someone like @benshapiro adores your movie, then you've done something dreadfully wrong—and I earnestly hope that Peter Jackson's treatment of #Tolkien one day gets a very thorough critical laceration. Jackson's a hacky director, and he made polished hackwork.

(3/x)
Read 14 tweets
Mar 5
it suddenly occurred to me: the amusing realization that the mere existence of *Caligula* confers a teensy bit of credibility to the Christian idea of the Incarnation. it's more credible that a human being might have claimed to have fully divine nature, that is to say.

(1/x)
we can guess that someone *like* Jesus may have existed, because a historical figure with much better attestation—namely Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, also known as "Little Boots" or _Caligula_ because as a child he dressed as a soldier—thought he was a god.

(2/x) John Hurt as the Emperor Ca...
hence *that* much of the Jesus story is plausible anyway: it's plausible to imagine, at least, someone _claiming_ to be the one and only Son of God, authorized to tell us all how wonderful Heaven was and drive out "demons" and all that. questionable activities, perhaps.

(3/x)
Read 19 tweets
Mar 4
I'm going to talk about something very painful now, but it must be discussed. it's a specific antisemitic trope. let these words serve as a content warning for the material I'm about to discuss:

the Jewish Problem™. @mtaibbi and @elonmusk and @joerogan know what I mean.

(1/x)
I won't discuss this painful subject in too much detail—if you want to learn about the origins of the antisemitic trope of the Jewish Problem™ in Western culture, read up on the NSDAP and the Third Reich—but take care that you read *good* books about the Third Reich.

(2/x)
that's the problem, isn't it? people like @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi don't read the *good* books about the Third Reich, but you can be pretty certain they've read a lot of bad ones. that's especially likely if they're the sort of people who think "history" means battles.

(3/x)
Read 14 tweets
Mar 4
if you're a bigot, you're a loser.

that's not some simple *insult*. it's in the nature of bigotry—it's the universal psychological defence mechanism, the escape-valve from any social awkwardness or personal failure. @charlesmurray is a bigot, and therefore he's a loser.

(1/x)
he's a mediocre, muddled man who feels like he's entitled to a permanent position in American scholarship even though he's muddled and mediocre. @AEI gave @charlesmurray some *illusion* of success but Murray dreamed bigger than an AEI propaganda job—you can bank on that.

(2/x)
a genuine biologist, a man who made fundamental contributions to evolutionary theory—Stephen Jay Gould—took @charlesmurray to pieces, and his response was to swallow his humiliation and double and treble down on bigotry, because that's how bigots deal with being failures.

(3/x)
Read 13 tweets
Mar 4
*bigotry* is a subject that right-wing (and "independent") bigots—@NateSilver538, @DavidAFrench, @DKThomp, whoever, there's so many of these clowns—have attempted to keep as confused as possible. they want to pretend "bigot" is merely a slur, not a meaningful word.

(1/x)
but as I've pointed out before, bigotry is really just overdeveloped snobbery. the snob—the person who has very definite ideas about their personal superiority, and the superiority of their own intellect and tastes and everything else—is already showing "bigoted" behavior.

(2/x)
just as one may exhibit abusive behaviors from time to time without necessarily being "an abuser" (i.e. someone whose whole personality is abusive behavior), a snobbish person may say bigoted things without necessarily being "a bigot", i.e. someone who does nothing else.

(3/x)
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(