AAP leader and former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia to be produced before Rouse Avenue Court after his arrest by ED yesterday in excise policy case.
Hossain reads allegations against Sisodia. He says that the policy was implemented as part of a conspiracy to give wholesale business to certain private companies.
Hossain: There was conspiracy to frame the policy in such a manner so as to ensure illegal benefits to some persons. There was no suggestion from the public to fix 12% of wholesale profit margin to private entities.
Hossain: Conspiracy was coordinated by Vijay Nair and others along with South Group. The new policy was brought out for extraordinary profit margin for wholesalers.
Hossain: The arrestee used sim cards issued and phones purchased on the name of others. He himself used phone purchased on some other person's name. Purchased on Flipkart and arrestee has not given payment.
Hossain: The proceeds of crime quantified for over Rs. 292 crores. Considering the magnitude of the matter, we need to identify completed modus operandi. We need to confront other persons who we have summoned. Seven persons we have issued. We are seeking remand of 10 days.
Krishnan now commences arguments on behalf of Sisodia.
Krishnan: According to them it's about faulty policy. Whose domain is it in constitutional structure? It's the executive. That's their job to make policy for people. When a policy is made by a govt, it goes through several layers. Through layers of elected govt and bureaucracy.
Krishnan: The policy then goes to LG....LG sir has applied his mind and sends back three recommendations or queries. Not 12% or eligibility criteria...why? Surely they must have examined the policy and everyone else who cleared it.
Krishnan: In money laundering, you're expected to look at concealment, possession and use. It has to be traced to the individual. Not a single penny has been traced to me. So they say Vinay Nair represented of Manish Sisodia. Laughable to say the least.
Krishnan: We are talking about a premium investigating agency. Why have they not been able to trace a single penny to me?
Krishnan: Under this draconian Act, the power to arrest is an extreme position. Where you've (judge) to decide that their subjective satisfaction would show that I'm likely to be guilty. Look at their document, everything is I heard I heard I heard.
Krishnan: I was never summoned by ED. Till one fine day, while remand applications were going on in CBI case, my bail application was fixed. One day before hearing of bail application, I'm arrested. ECIR is of August 2020. This kind of conduct must concern the court.
Krishnan: The process itself is illegal here.
It can't be that a person is kept in custody in a special Act (PMLA) just to ensure that he does not get bail.
Krishnan: This remand application does not need the test fo section 19. A court cannot ignore that the timing of arrest here is mala fide and only to keep a man in continued detention.
Krishnan: Madal Lal case says that you've to show concealment, possession, acquisition, use, claiming of proceeds od crime. Where is a whisper of all this, particularly in view or section 19? Time has come for courts to come down heavily in this. I urge you sir to be the first.
Senior Advocate Mohit Mathur now commences arguments on behalf of Sisodia.
Mathur: It's only a fashion these days that they take it (arrest) as a matter of right. Time has come for these courts dealing with such agencies, they must come down heavily in case of any entitlement that they feel they have.
Mathur: Where do they get this power is only because neither we're doing homework properly nor infirming court that it needs to look into it and see if they have custody powers.
Mathur: While we are in your custody, you record a statement which you take a shelter that it's not a statement to a police officer. But for taking custody, you are saying that its a policy custody. There is no direct judgment on whether they've power to seek remand.
Hossain: There are judgments. I have direct judgments. I've also called for other High Court judgments.
Aggarwal: It's so easy in our country that maine so and so functionary ke liye paise uthaaye, aap us bande ko andar kar dijiye. Agar aisa hua toh section 19 khatam hojayega aur janaab ki oversight khatam hojaegi.
Aggarwal: .....whithout any money trial and without any money coming to me, can we say that in their assessment that i am guilty of money laundering?
#BREAKING Central Government opposes pleas in #SupremeCourt seeking recognition of same-sex marriage.
Decriminalisation of Section 377 IPC cannot give rise to a claim to seek recognition for same-sex marriage, Centre says in counter-affidavit. #SupremeCourtOfIndia#LGBT
Living together of persons in same-sex relationships "cannot be compared to the Indian family concept of a husband, a wife and children born out of the union" , Centre tells #SupremeCourtOfIndia#SameSexMarriage#LGBTQIA
Statutory recognition of marriage limited to heterosexual in nature, is the norm throughout history and are foundational to both the existence and continuance of the State : Centre tells #SupremeCourtOfIndia#SupremeCourt#LGBTQI
A lecture by Supreme Court Judge, Justice B.V. Nagarathna on the topic 'Transformative Constitutionalism', as part of the Chief Justice KK Usha Memorial Lecture, is to commence shortly.
The lecture is being organized by the Kerala Federation of Women Lawyers as part of the Women's Day Celebrations 2023. It is being held at the Kerala High Court Auditorium.
#Breaking :Plea in Bombay HC against Maha GR to monitor inter-faith & inter-caste marriages.
"Assumption that adult women who choose and consent to marry someone from another faith need to be 'saved' is misplaced and goes against the spirit of the Constitution" #BombayHighCourt
GR is the government's attempt to discourage and/or forbid inter-faith marriages and is essentially a pre-cursor to laws related to purported love jihad marriages which have stayed in numerous States of India.
The petition by Samajwadi Party MLA @rais_shk states that the resolution is discriminatory against a particular religion and is violative of Articles 14 (right to equality), Article 15 (forbidding discrimination), 21 (right to life which includes the right to privacy), and 25.
The Kerala High Court is set to continue the hearing on the suo motu petition initiated by it in connection with the fire at the Brahmapuram Waste Management Plant.
The Kerala High Court has directed to post the bail plea moved by the former Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister of Kerala, M. Sivasankar, who had been arrested by ED in connection with money laundering related to the LIFE Mission case, before the appropriate Bench
Justice Kauser Edappagath observed, "The predicate offence may be Prevention of Corruption Act, but this is under Sections 3 and 4 of PMLA. No PC Act offence is involved".
The Court thus directed the matter to be posted before the appropriate Bench. #KeralaHC