Kaul: According to us the controversy is narrowed down. We can show that either the statute can be harmoniously construed or in light of Navtej Singh, it has to be recognised. Because your lordships have recognised privacy...
Dr AM Singhvi: One is philosophical proposition - Right to love makes us human. It should be extended in equal terms. You can extend it only on equal terms only if your lordships reads down the special marriage act and other acts.
Vishwanathan: This case is not about transgender statute or HMA, what it is about is 19(1)(a). The right of choosing a partner is the right of expression, right of dignity. It's only a natural right, an assertion of a right. It has implications.
SG Mehta: So far as right to love, express, freedom of choice is concerned - your lordships have taken care of that in Navtej Singh Johar. Your lordships said that this doesn't mean conferring right of marriage.
SG Mehta: This is a legislative function. It will then be about adoption. Parliament will have to see psychology of a child who has not been reared by a father and a mother- these are the issues. The parliament will have to debate and take a call on whether in view of our ethos-
CJI DY Chandrachud: Mr SG, the adopted child of a lesbian or a gay couple need not necessarily be a lesbian or gay.
Kaul: The proceedings need to be live streamed. There are people across India interested in this. The Navtej Singh Johar judgement held that such verdicts need to be given as much publicity as possible.
CJI DY Chandrachud: We will list this for hearing on 18th April. Perhaps, it is a matter important to invoke 145(3) (to refer to Constitution Bench). It is a matter of seminal importance.
CJI DY Chandrachud: We are of the view that it would be appropriate if the issues raised are resolved by the bench of five judges of this court with due regard to A 145(3) of the Constitution. Thus, we direct it to be placed before a constitution bench.
CJI DY Chandrachud: SG states that one counter affidavit is already filed. In the event any supplement is required, that shall be done within a period of three weeks.
The Kerala High Court will soon continue its hearing on the suo motu petition initiated by it in connection with the fire at the Brahmapuram Waste Management Plant.
The Court had, on Friday (March 10, 2023), formed a High Level Committee to audit the facilities provided by the Cochin Corporation.
The report on the previous day's hearing can be found here: livelaw.in/news-updates/b…
The Kerala High Court is set to hear the bail application moved by the CM's former Principal Secretary, M. Sivasankar, who had been arrested by ED in connection with money laundering related to the LIFE Mission case #KeralaHC#MoneyLaundering#LIFEMissionCase
A Special PMLA Court at Kochi had rejected Sivasankar's bail application on March 2 and extended his custody till March 21. Sivasankar had moved the plea seeking bail on medical grounds. He had alleged the arrest as a 'political stunt'. #KeralaHC#LIFEMissionCase#MoneyLaundering
CJI DY Chandrachud: Mr AG, the Defence Ministry cannot take the law in its own hand! The notification Defence Secretary issues is directly against our orders. After he withdraws the communication of 20th, then we can hear your application.
Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi: You seem to have enough money for other things but you don't have money for pensioners? It's very unfair. 4 lakh pensioners have died during pendency of OROP petitions.
#SupremeCourt to hear Telangana police’s plea against Telangana HC's order transferring a probe into an alleged attempt by Bharatiya Janata Party to poach 4 Bharat Rashtra Samiti (ruling party) MLAs, from an SIT formed by the state govt to CBI.
Khanna J: We will hear you out on a non-miscellaneous day. There are two things: One, whether this appeal is maintainable & on merits. It will take time. This will go to July.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear a petition challenging a 2018 decision by Allahabad HC to remove a mosque called Waqf Masjid High Court from its premises, on the ground that "no part of its premises was permitted to be used to carry on any religious activity".
Sibal : This has a history. The present building of Allahabad HC was constructed in the year 1861. Since the time of shifting, Muslim advocates, Muslim clerks, Muslim clients were offering namaz on the northern corner on Fridays..there was wazu arrangement too
#BREAKING Central Government opposes pleas in #SupremeCourt seeking recognition of same-sex marriage.
Decriminalisation of Section 377 IPC cannot give rise to a claim to seek recognition for same-sex marriage, Centre says in counter-affidavit. #SupremeCourtOfIndia#LGBT
Living together of persons in same-sex relationships "cannot be compared to the Indian family concept of a husband, a wife and children born out of the union" , Centre tells #SupremeCourtOfIndia#SameSexMarriage#LGBTQIA
Statutory recognition of marriage limited to heterosexual in nature, is the norm throughout history and are foundational to both the existence and continuance of the State : Centre tells #SupremeCourtOfIndia#SupremeCourt#LGBTQI