ah yes, I was going to say more about The Fear™, which is so difficult to discuss. discussing #fear in general is tough; the social taboos of Western culture and Western discourse forbid open discussion of fear. hardline Christianity is largely to blame; fear is useful to them.
fear is the chief weapon of Christian fanatics—e.g. @MattWalshBlog, @laurenboebert, @PastorMark, even mild-mannered @DouthatNYT—and they've good reason: they themselves are afraid. it's likely that they're at least partly afraid of *themselves*; they feel they need a tight leash.
that's the general effect of fear on the human psyche—limitation. your fears determine your boundaries and the range of your likely actions.
extremist Christians believe they've solved the problem of fear, through unwavering faith in...well, something. they have faith, though.
one can't be certain about what people like @MattWalshBlog and @HawleyMO *really* believe—but we can at least be certain that they believe in it very strongly. right-wing Christians, "patriotic" Christians, are highly ideological and predictable; they believe themselves reliable.
staunch faith in *anything*—even if it's just a physical object—is very powerful. it may be humanity's greatest strength, for in such faith lies the secret to human persistence...human #determination. it's a reason to keep going, keep stepping forward, no matter the cost.
#faith is not unique to hardline Christians and I'm not entirely sure how the @pastorlocke / @Franklin_Graham right-wing crowd deal with that truism. their bigoted terror of Islam and their staunch antisemitism (these two things are related) suggest a possible answer to that.
it's fairly clear to me that bigoted Christians like @DouthatNYT and @MattWalshBlog really and truly can't get their minds round the idea that other faiths exist and work out quite well for the people who have them. Judaism and Islam must *baffle* such dull, blinkered persons.
in any case, fear can keep a human being tethered to faith. extremist Christians have developed a lot of elaborate, ritualized ways of depicting and enacting their fear of somehow having their faith *ripped out of them*—taken away at gunpoint, or with some diabolical "medicine".
and they're dead certain that the only way to rule the masses is through pain and terror. @MattWalshBlog, @PastorMark, and the rest of them treat their own *children* like sheep or cattle to be screamed at, ordered about, whipped onwards with threats (and belts and fists.)
and because @MattWalshBlog and @pegobry and all the rest of these abysmally ignorant and brutish Christians view most of the *world* as if they were little more than surly spoiled children (or cattle), they think that fear and terror are the only way to manage a world hegemony.
the Christian fanatics want there to be only *one* acceptable answer for fear, all fears: themselves.
God, Jesus, the Bible, all the elaborate Catholic and Orthodox doctrines that fascist gasbags like @DouthatNYT and @ebruenig must love to chatter about—it's all set-dressing to them. props, ornaments, commercial tat decorating the walls, like in that infamous photo of @RepMTG.
@RepMTG and @MattWalshBlog and the rest of these extremely bigoted and nasty Christian persons will never stop talking about their faith in "Him ❤️".
but who is *He*, exactly? to myself, personally, "He" doesn't seem like anyone I'd like to worship. I don't feel the *need*.
maybe it really is a jolly strong and lovely faith that @MattWalshBlog &c. have, but considering what sort of people they are, I can only conclude that their faith isn't exactly doing them any favors. I do very much wonder what these people *actually* are putting their faith in.
incidentally, *another* bad sign that some offered reading material is in fact propaganda is that the author (or pusher) of the work refuses to explain anything about it. @mtaibbi is particularly adept at evading difficult questions about the nature of his work.
(may I tag you in, @Jacob__Siegel? you may learn something...or you may not.)
there's a number of reasons why @mtaibbi is reluctant to explain his propaganda. emotional appeal is one reason: he's trying to tempt readers in, hinting at *mystery* and forbidden secrets.
(cont'd)
this is central to the appeal of bigotry and bigoted conspiracy theories, like the Sinophobic rubbish about #COVID19 that @NateSilver538 (and @mtaibbi and his @GOP allies) have been peddling, or the antisemitic crap that's popular with the @elonmusk / @MrAndyNgo crowd.
when is it *acceptable* not to read something that's pushed in front of you? most of us (myself included) are mortal beings, bound by time and entropy like everyone; we've got a thousand daily concerns to balance, and we can't read everything that's recommended to us.
(cont'd)
now, if you're a propagandist like @mtaibbi or @charlesmurray, it's never acceptable not to read their junk—and that attitude, right there, is a key hint that their work *is* in fact junk. it's not _proof_ but it's a strong indication that they're pushing propaganda.
(cont'd)
for the point of propaganda is not to be persuasive in terms of logic and rational inference and sensible deductions from evidence. propaganda's appeal is *emotional* appeal; @mtaibbi's work, and other right-wing propaganda, is designed to be _maximally memetic_.
this article indicates why racist dolts like @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi (not to mention all those Christofascist pundits like @DouthatNYT) are so cynical about higher education: in *their* social stratum, the point of college isn't to learn anything.
a high-status college means *networking*, making powerful friends, getting job offers for no better reason than "you've been to the same upper-crust finishing school as me". @NateSilver538 is a dunce because he's never *needed* to be good at schooling—not with his connections.
all those rich parents know the score; they're willing to pay millions just to get a string of big names onto their kids' resumes. @NateSilver538's equally racist (and equally stupid) pal, @mattyglesias, son of a Hollywood writer, got sent to a $50k/year *grade school*.
I'm awaiting an event in the near future; I'm not quite sure how it's going to play out, or how quickly. but I suspect that the fiasco of @elonmusk's ownership and right-wing politicization of @Twitter will mark the end of a global illusion, perpetuated on the Internet.
(cont'd)
the illusion was that the #Internet was somehow equivalent to #democracy itself. merely being on the Internet, in this social illusion, was like participating in democracy. the idea was that "everyone" had a voice of equal weight and importance to every other voice.
(cont'd)
nobody bought into that illusion, or put more energy into sustaining it, harder than @jack Dorsey and @Twitter.
it's a lie. access to the #Internet is a matter of money, just like everything else in this authoritarian, capitalist society. the rich get *more Internet*.
one of the sillier manifestations of right-wing ideology in this era of electronic mass communication—which seems to have dissolved all political discourse into a soup of memes and buzzwords—is the oxymoronic "anarchocapitalism", or #AnCap. it's big with computer geeks.
(cont'd)
surely a large fraction of the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @ShellenbergerMD right-wing Twitter clique—which attracts mostly people who enjoy the luxury of "passive income" through non-productive means, like management or cryptocurrency—fancy themselves "anarchocapitalist".
(cont'd)
why not? the average @elonmusk / @mtaibbi fan has a purely emotional and aesthetic appreciation of political and economic terminology. they don't think of "anarchism" as a body of political theory, but as a mood or a pose—being rebellious, breaking all the rules, etc.
a quick comment on @Twitter / @TwitterDev and how @elonmusk's control of these entities now means that we can't trust "engagement" statistics from Twitter any more.
it's widely grasped that Musk's loyalists are doing whatever they can to maximize their visibility here.
(cont'd)
that's also meant that @elonmusk's instructing @Twitter / @TwitterDev staff to suppress *critics* of Musk and his right-wing #Twitter regime—it's to be noted that fierce independent champion of #FreeSpeech, @mtaibbi, has no opinion about Musk's Twitter censorship.
(cont'd)
most likely @mtaibbi knows that he *benefits* from @elonmusk's dictatorial meddlings with @Twitter and #Twitter visibility, so of course he's not going to complain about it—when pressed, he'll probably claim that it's Elon Musk's right to rule Twitter dictatorially.