We have sent this independent report to press, peers, think tanks, @victor_madrigal at @UN & @Commonswomequ. We encourage you to read & send to your own schools, MPs & local safeguarding boards. We warn you it’s a difficult read. #SafeguardingFail#PolicyFail
Quote for press is: Tanya Carter Spokeswoman for Safe Schools Alliance said “This alarming, but sadly unsurprising, research sets out how long-established child safeguarding principles are being effectively dismantled. This leaves all children at risk…
Adults, professionally charged with the protection of children, have failed in their duty to identify this and this abdication of responsibility has left generations of children at risk of harm. Children are being left to navigate a minefield of predatory behaviour online…
without either protection or guidance. Those who have allowed this to happen must be identified and held to account by the global community.” For further quotes or interview email info@safeschoolsallianceuk.org. The report is a long and harrowing read so here are key findings
On page 6 you can see the thinking that led @Warwickshire_CC promoting the now withdrawn ‘all about me’ program that encouraged young primary children to masturbate. This was reported in the press at the time coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-…
Page 11 details the concerning framing that has been found around the Age of Consent. This is similar to the ambiguity seen in other recent global documents such as such as ‘8 March principles’ icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/upl…
Page 12 details where the line has been crossed from giving children factual and helpful information about their own bodies to encouraging masturbation.
Page 13 shows the abdication of adult responsibilities & the expectation that children should protect themselves from abuse & demonstrates who loopholes have been created for predators.
Page 26 deals further with the cavalier attitude towards Age of Consent from both @WHO & @UNESCO. Safe Schools Alliance believes we should be moving towards global standards of an Age of consent of 18 for both marriage & heterosexual & homosexual sex. Under 18’s are children.
Page 30 discusses ‘sexual rights of children’. It should be noted UK governments key safeguarding document ‘keeping children safe in education’ is very clear that adults who can’t differentiate between adults & children are a risk. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Page 32 notes the clear push to override biological sex in law with ‘gender identity’. The implications of this for women, girls & those in need of protection for their sexual orientation are horrific.
Following on from McGeeney being instrumental in provoking parents to attempts to sue @WG_Education@NSPCC thought she (& others) would be the ideal people to assist them in their own ongoing attempts to undermine effective #safeguarding
If you can’t read the whole report, read the charts from page 51 onwards, that set out why this is all so incredibly concerning, why this IS an attack on #safeguarding itself & potentially the age of consent.
If after reading all the charts at the back you STILL do not see the issues here, are STILL claiming this is ‘anti LGBT’ ‘anti #RSE’ ‘right wing’ or ‘pearl clutching’ you do not understand #safeguarding & you shouldn’t be working with children or on policy that affects them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread for ‘but is this happening in schools’ #Edutwitter. Yes it is. Firstly personal testimony: “the school nurse had referred her to the school counsellor [who] informed [her] that a hatred of one’s breasts could be an indicator of a non-binary” safeschoolsallianceuk.net/our-stories/ou…
More testimony: “I am utterly horrified at what was taught at a PSHE lesson at my school recently. It was to a group of children, most are 11-12 years old. It is so, so much worse than I thought.” #Edutwitter#DiverseEd#LGBT
More personal testimony: “We did request to see their transgender policy and it was kafkaesque – it repeatedly conflated sex & gender… & downplayed the effects of binders, blockers and hormones” #Edutwitter#WomeEd#PSHEPeeps
. @BrookCharity is one of the providers we frequently hear complaints about from both parents & teachers. Advising children to watch porn is not what they were expecting from #RSE. They want children taught about harms & how to have a healthy relationships as adults. #edutwitter
Welcome to all our new followers! We have just passed 18k. Please look round our website to find out more about us. We are a grassroots group of mainly parents & teachers with no funding, religious or political affiliations. #Edutwitter#Safeguardingsafeschoolsallianceuk.net
Since then we have run many successful campaigns to protect children from inappropriate & politically biased materials, such as this from @BBC_Teach that bizarrely informed children that there were ‘over 100 different genders’ safeschoolsallianceuk.net/2019/09/04/ssa…
None of this is new, we have been raising the alarm for years, as were many individuals & groups before us. Now people who were asked for help years ago are pretending to be shocked at what is going on, while others remain in denial. #Edutwitter#WomenEd
It is steeped in ideological language, it sexualises children, talks inaccuratly about biology, & does not talk about the dangers & reality of porn. It gives an introduction to polyamory and an uncritical mention of surrogacy - we would say it is written by activists not experts.
This image places the penis and vulva on a continuum, showing genitals as ‘variations’. This image perpetuates the myth that is possible to be neither male nor female. It is untrue, ideological, exploitative and will confuse children about biology.
We are struggling to find the words for the despicable lack of #safeguarding these girls were subjected to. It is appalling that their boundaries were so eroded that they accepted this man, this rapist, in their class. What have we done to girls that they…scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-…
accept being told to strip in front of a man as part of a college course? This is widespread societal grooming that anybody has accepted any of this, ever. Did anybody at the college attend their #safeguarding training? Why were they not able to apply it to a real life situation?
Why was it not a massive red flag that a man wanted to attend a course where much younger women were undressing? How on earth did people who should have been safeguard trained not recognise this for the predatory behaviour that it was?