And "Sociology" & related "Medical" type "studies" are the worst culprits
The ones that say otherwise are highly biased cherry-picked "studies" of self-selected participants by activist "researchers" threadreaderapp.com/thread/1661453…
—Assoc Prof P Hruz-Paediatrics & Endocrinology Washington U Sch of Med St Louis
—Prof LS Mayer-Psychiatry Johns Hopkins University Sch of Med & Stats & Biostats Arizona State U
—Prof PR McHugh-Psych & Behavioral Sci Johns H U Sch of M
— Dr Denise Hough
— Dr Michelle Bellingham
— Dr Irah Haraldsen
— Dr Mark McLaughlin
— Dr Jane Robinson
— Associate Professor Anne-Kristin Solbakk
— Professor Neil Evans
Asst Prof Maiko Schneider
Prof Poli Spritzer
Bianca Machado Borba Soll
Dr Anna M V Fontanari
Dr Fernanda Tovar-Moll
Adjnt Prof Angelo B Costa
Dr Dhiordan Cardoso da Silva
Dr Karine Schwarz
Dr Silza Tramontina
Dr Maria I R Lobato
— Dr Alexander Korte - Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy at the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich
...fraught with extensive & irreversible adverse consequences..cardiovascular disease osteoporosis infertility increased cancer risk & thrombosis..makes it challenging to assess...
“To treat puberty as a pathology that should be prevented by..puberty blocking..interrupt a major..transformation..puberty cannot safely be put off to..later”
—Adjct Assoc Prof Q L Van Meter-Pediatric Endocrinologist Emory U Georgia
With all the troubles in the world why do you have to obsess over infiltrating men who would prefer to dress up in floral frocks stockings & lipstick into boring black cassocks😯
With all the troubles in the world why do you have to obsess over infiltrating men who would prefer to dress up in floral frocks stockings & lipstick into boring black cassocks😯
By the way it's Marriage RITE NOT "Right"😮
Churches do it to promote growth😲🤦♂️
By the way it's Marriage RITE NOT "Right"😮
Churches do it to promote growth😲🤦♂️
Usually
Unlike the Shakers
Who banned sex even in marriage
And so died out
Like the Russian Skoptsy sect who castrated themselves😱
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Of course you did
And of course you are
Lets assume the pandemic was as dangerous as claimed
And the deaths were going to be as high as predicted
We also knew that the deaths from lockdowns would be even higher
Based on half a century of research
On a century of data!😲😱🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette And we also had pandemic plans in place that were based on even worse pandemics than predicted for Covid
eg the US plan was based on nearly a million fatalities
But didn't include lockdowns
So why did we lock down & isolate the healthy
When we knew that would kill more!😲😱🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Despite fact we knew from Diamond Princess Covid wouldn't be that bad
And we knew from very early on that kids couldn't & didn't infect adults
Yet we even locked down kids & prevented their normal education & development
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette What test tells you if the Covid19 virus is "live or dead"?
I thought YOU were the expert!
How did *#I* validate it?😲🤦♂️
In *#MY* lab you mean?!😂🤣🤣
The PCR "Test" certainly doesn't tell you if the FRAGMENT of virus is alive or dead
Common sense tells you it's stone dead🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette If you WERE an expert you'd know you can only confirm it's alive by growing a sample
But as that takes time & money they didn't seem to bother too much with that
And they should also have notified the doctor of the number of cycles used
Ideally after using a sensible number!🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Medical professionals always knew PCR "Tests" especially at high cycle rates couldn't 7 shouldn't be used for "diagnosing" a disease!😲
Until they started getting paid for testing for & signing off on PCR "Test" Covid19 "diagnoses"😱🤦♂️
@Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Kary Mullis didn't say finding a trace of a micro-organism IS a diagnosis
IF a person IS ill with the RELEVANT symptoms
The PCR test can be used as a tool to HELP confirm the diagnosis of WHAT the organism is
Finding a scrap of an organism your body destroyed months ago...
@Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette A PCR test finding a scrap of an organism your body destroyed months ago isn't a "diagnosis" you have live ones in your body now
Never mind enough to make you ill
Or infect others
Never mind finding a scrap of virus that just floated up your nose onto the swab into the tube...
@Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette And a PCR test finding a scrap of a virus the floated onto the sample in the lab certainly doesn't "diagnose" anything
And even if it finds a current scrap of a virus that was currently in your body & was currently live & present in some numbers it proves you're infected with it