, 33 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
Rudd’s officials step up their *legal* discrimination against EU citizens. Thread. 1/
In 2016, HO began deporting EU cits reported by charities as without settled accommodation. Campaigners opposed nelmacampaigns.wordpress.com/home/ 2/
Detention is a key HO tool against these EU citizens; tho hardly a “flight risk” - will they leave the UK?? 3/
Detention helps HO make case for deportation bc it makes it harder for migrants to show they are economically active. > 4/
Under EU law, temporary work makes a citizen a worker - even if it’s a job that lasts a day. 5/
Being locked up blocks access to this work, and detainee’s find it hard to corroborate case that they would find work if released 6/
So getting released can be crucial for EU citizen to prove her/his right to live in UK as an economically active person. 7/
HO policy of maximising is detention powers means finding excuses not to release people. One of these is “s/he has no place to stay”. 8/
Over years, migrants, lawyers & campaigners countered this excuse with Section 4 of Immigration & Asylum Act 1999 legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/33/… 9/
HO policy is that s4 accommodation must be made available where lack of accomm is obstacle to release on bail 10/
But HO is often divided & conflicted about its own pro-migrant policies, with some senior & junior staff trying to weaken them. 11/
These “hardliners” look for ways not to apply policies, like delaying, ignoring or finding exceptions. 12/
One exception to Section 4 accommodation is Schedule 3 to the Nationality Immigration & Asylum Act 2002 legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/41/… 13/
Sch 3 applies to accommodation under Imm & Asylum Act 1999 (para 1(1)l) & bars providing it to ppl Schedule applies to (para 1) 14/
Sch 3 says it applies to *all EEA citizens* (para 3) - which includes all EU cits (bc EU states are parties to EEA agreement) 15/
(Using “EEA” to mean all EU + EEA states of Norway, Iceland & Liechtenstein) is common in UK laws. Bc all have same rights under EU law) 16/
But would break EU law to bar EU cits from social support in para 1 (which is most non-cash support). That’s illegal discrimination 17/
So Sch 3 doesn’t apply if it would break EU law to apply it: or break human rights law (para 3). 18/
HO letter to Romanian man they detained talked abt his EU law & human rights, because to deny s4 accommodation, Sch 3 needs this covered 19/
New legal territory for HO afaik. Policy of deporting EU cits as non-econ active is new, so denials of s4 accom to EU cits is new AFAIK 20/
But is it legal? Sch 3 says s4 accommodation can be denied to a Romanian *because he is an EU cit*. That’s blatant discrimination 21/
EU law bars governments from discriminating on grounds of nationality of an EU state: Article 18 TFEU. Unless an exception applies. 22/
EU law allows UK to deport EU cits (where strict conditions met) & to detain them pending (if necessary) even tho UK cits can’t be 23/
But does EU law allow a UK law like Sch 3 that denies accom “just because” the person is an EU cit? How is that justified? 24/
Afaik this legal issue hasnt been decided by UK courts. I argued it in High Court a long time ago against Lambeth Council > 25/
Lambeth had cut off day care to a mentally disabled Portuguese woman long resident in UK with her family. Judge heard the legal argument 26/
but when he was ready with judgment, Lambeth said wd give my client back her services & pay her legal costs if we agreed to no judgment 27/
But if Rudd really does want to keep EU cits locked up based on discriminatory denial of accomm, she may end up in court. 28/28
Update: HO respond stating Romanian man is violent offender awaiting removal 29/
Important +ve step for HO to be more open abt it’s decisions. But language of HO rebuttal is strange & hard to reconcile with Observer > 30/
Where HO acts vs EU cits on basis of risk of serious crime, use deportation (which bars their return). But HO doesn’t use that word 31/
Presumably Romanian man wanted bail while his appeal vs removal is pending: so if he is too dangerous to release, why doesn’t HO say so? 32/
But these omissions from HO rebuttal are as likely to be bc HO doesn’t want/like explaining itself, not bc decision itself is wrong 33/33
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Simon Cox
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!