A New York federal judge has ruled against Bill O'Reilly's attempt to seal certain settlement agreements with his female accusers. 1/
O'Reilly had argued that the documents related merely to '[E]mbarrassing conduct with no public ramifications’ 2/
The judge verily laughed off the argument, stating that the agreements are in the public interest, compelled by the 1st Amendment, etc. 3/
One of the agreements was with Andrea Mackris. Its confidentiality provisions are so freaky as to include this: 
Has anyone seen such a thing before? 5/
And check out this one: The firm that represented Mackris agrees to some strange provisions: 6/
