The more I see and observe of #SAFe in different orgs and different contexts, the more I find that I strongly disagree with.
It's not just the poor choice of language and metaphors (Trains??)
It's not just the bastardisation of CoD or WSJF.
It's not just the rigid, enforced structure.
It's not just the rigid, enforced process.
It's not just the unbelievably stupid "normalised storypoints"...
It's not just the bastardisation of CoD or WSJF.
It's not just the rigid, enforced structure.
It's not just the rigid, enforced process.
It's not just the unbelievably stupid "normalised storypoints"...
It's not even all the things that are missing or largely buried – that you should really focus on if you truly need to "scale".
No. Having observed #SAFe implementations in different orgs and contexts, the part that I most _strongly_ disagree with, is this:
SAFe's violent, Big Bang approach to organisational change.
SAFe's violent, Big Bang approach to organisational change.
(Now waiting for Mr Landsberger to turn up in my mentions and tell me that they've observed measurable improvements: "Eppur Si Muove!")
Why, Hello Mr Landsberger! (Nice straw man you have there too!)
WHAT ABOUT “THE SPOTIFY MODEL”. 
