Dear @ClassConscious1 - as revealed by Snowden's #JTRIG documents ideology is the primary attack vector for splitting solidarity in social movements. Ideological attacks on a non-ideological movement play into the hands of the state you claim to oppose
Furthermore - branding anyone you disagree with ideologically a Nazi or a fascist is yet another known tactic of the state intelligence agencies. That attack vector was tried by the Guardian against the Anonymous movement in 2012, as I wrote about here: endarken.co.nz/critical-think…
The tragic @ClassConscious1 article accuses us of being opportunistic, yet fails to acknowledge @AssangeMrs has repeatedly called for unity across the political spectrum in support of her son. Attempts to impose ideology on a non-ideological movement fly in the face of her wishes
It discredits the entire socialist movement when the first major opportunity that everyday people have to achieve a massive blow against the system that oppresses humanity worldwide, is reduced by them to merely an opportunity to push, shove and jostle for ideological supremacy.
Unmentioned in the article is that the #Unity4J movement provides no-strings-attached, wholehearted support, solidarity & assistance to the @ClassConscious1 campaign efforts. For them to take with one hand while hitting with the other should be the cause of some self-reflection
The argument made by @ClassConscious1 was debated live at an event I appeared at with @AssangeMrs 2 days ago. Audience response made it very clear that it is past time we have a movement that is not hamstringed by politics or ideology. From 1:10:40:
That @ClassConscious1 are promoting an article full of attacks on #Unity4J as being "not an attack", indicates they know deep down what they are doing is wrong. Am sadly not surprised at all to see that the first attacks on a movement to free a man come from what should be allies
