Profile picture
Marijn van Putten @PhDniX
, 21 tweets, 11 min read Read on Twitter
In "Qur'ans of the Umayyads", François Déroche makes multiple references to the idea that the use of "Scriptio Continua" is typical for early Qurans and especially typical of Qurans in the old Hijazi style. Let's challenge that myth
brill.com/view/title/239…
Scriptio continua is the lack of the concept of a 'space'. The space between letters is just as big, regardless of whether the two letters belong to the same word or do not.
Déroche repeatedly says the Arabic script was 'adapted' to scriptia continua.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scriptio_…
"Adapted" seems to imply that Arabic previously had the ability to express spaces, but that these were dropped in favour of scriptio continua; perhaps to be more like the Romans. There is nothing that suggests this is the case. Arabic had scriptio continua from the start.
Arabic has the nice feature though that, if letters do belong together in a word, and do not contain a و، د، ذ، ز، ر، ا will actually be written completely connected in its continuous script. Letter blocks usually align with words; Arabic is well-suited for scriptio continua.
Even in its earliest forms (i.e. (transitional) Nabataeo-Arabic), the scriptio continua is clearly visible. Such as in the Nammara inscription (328 CE) and En Avdat inscription (around 88-126CE).
islamic-awareness.org/history/islam/…
islamic-awareness.org/history/islam/…
Inspiration from scripts like Greek and Latin, that often used this practice is not impossible, but difficult to prove. Even Imperial Aramaic script (ancestor of the Nabataean script) could be written in scriptio continua; so no need to assume that it was Graeco-Roman inspiration
So can we use scriptio continua as a way to determine whether a Quranic document is Hijazi/very ancient?

It is true, all Hijazi Qurans are written in scriptio continua, e.g. BL Or. 2165 and BnF Arabe 328a.
bl.uk/manuscripts/Fu…
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
But this is also true for every Kufic Quran ever. It is also true for Déroche's newly identified style "O I" (the style of the early Umayyad Qurans), such as BnF Arabe 330c. This is something Déroche also recognises.

gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
Kufic A, likewise, always has scriptio continua. See for example BnF Arabe 330d.

gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
Kufic B1a? Scriptio Continua. (BnF Arabe 328d)

gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
Kufic B1b, idem (BnF Arabe 327).
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
Kufic B2 is no different (BnF Arabe 329b).
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
You get the idea. Kufic C (BnF Arabe 334a), D (BnF Arabe 325b) and E (BnF Arabe 326i) all follow the same pattern.

gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
So clearly, Kufic just always has scriptio continua; And since Kufic continues well into the 11th century, it's not exactly a good feature to define "early" by. But what about New Style Qurans? Also: Scriptio Continua. (BnF Arabe 342b).
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
Well, what about Maghrebi Qurans? Scriptio Continua.
Leiden Universiteitbibliotheek Or. 228.
…online.com.ezproxy.leidenuniv.nl:2048//browse/memo-1… (no open acces; sorry).
Well then, surely, the Ottoman Qurans in the all-familiar Naskh script will have spaces? Actually, they don't. Here's two Qurans, one from 1594 and 1790.

Throughout the entire written history, the Arabic script didn't have spaces.

gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv…
I say written, because at "printed" is when the turning point starts to happen; as has been pointed out expertly and often by @ThomasMiloNL, printed Qurans suddenly start to have word spacing. Looking at the Cairo Edition there is no doubt where one word starts and the other ends
And this is true for most Arabic fonts today. While Scriptio Continua, which is attributed to "western" influence, can't convincingly be attributed to that; the concept of "word spacing" may be!

The assumption that Arabic script "should" work like that is anachronistic.
The scriptio continua of the Mushaf Muscat (mushafmuscat.om) is hence a return to form of what handwritten Naskhi Qurans look like, before the technical limitations, and assumptions of printers introduced spaces into the Quran.
To conclude, let's stop saying like Scriptio Continua is somehow a special feature of early Qurans. This is only the case if you put it next to a modern print edition of the Quran. There is over a millenium of Scription Continue in the Islamic period, and it started before that.
Derp; I did not clip the right part of the first paragraph image. Sorry!
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Marijn van Putten
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!