Thread by @Headsnipe011

YES PLEASE!!!

Grassley, Bipartisan Colleagues Release Draft Legislation to End Surprise Medical Bills

@drawandstrike @ThomasWictor @HNIJohnMiller @catesduane @rising_serpent @_ImperatorRex_ @Debradelai @GodlessNZ @almostjingo @tracybeanz

grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa joined Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and a bipartisan group of senators of the bipartisan Senate health care price transparency working group, in releasing draft legislation to protect patients from surprise medical bills.

The draft bill is intended to jumpstart discussions in Congress about how to best stop the use of balanced billing to charge patients for emergency treatment or treatment provided by an out-of-network provider at an in-network facility.

Recent examples of patients receiving surprise medical bills include a patient who received a bill of nearly $109,000 for care after a heart attack and a patient who received a $17,850 bill for a urine test.

“No one should receive surprise medical bills. This draft legislation will add transparency and fairness to health care costs. I look forward to this important consumer protection becoming law,” Grassley said.

“Patients should have the power, even in emergency situations when they are unable to negotiate,” Cassidy said. “Our proposal protects patients in those emergency situations where current law does not,

so that they don’t receive a surprise bill that is basically uncapped by anything but a sense of shame.”

The discussion draft of the Protecting Patients from Surprise Medical Bills Act addresses three scenarios:

Emergency services provided by an out-of-network provider in an out-of-network facility: The draft bill would ensure that a patient is only required to pay the cost-sharing amount required by their health plan, and a provider may not bill the patient for an additional payment.

The excess amount above the cost-sharing amount will be paid by the patient’s health plan in accordance with an applicable state law or an amount based on the greater of the median in-network amount negotiated by health plans and health insurance issuers or...

125 percent of the average allowed amount for the service provided by a provider in the same or similar specialty and provided in the same geographical area.

Non-Emergency services following an emergency service from an out-of-network facility: The draft bill would ensure that if a patient receives an emergency service from an out-of-network health care provider or facility and requires additional services after being stabilized,

the health care facility or hospital will notify the patient, or their designee, that they may be required to pay higher cost-sharing than if they received an in-network service and give the patient an option to transfer to an in-network facility.

The patient, or their designee, would also be required to sign a written acknowledgment of that notification.

Non-Emergency services performed by an out-of-network provider at an in-network facility:

The draft bill would ensure that a health plan or out-of-network provider cannot bill a patient beyond their in-network cost-sharing in the case of a non-emergency service that is provided by an out-of-network provider in an in-network facility.

The excess amount above the cost-sharing amount will be paid by the patient’s health plan in accordance with an applicable state law or an amount based on the greater of the median in-network amount negotiated by health plans and...

health insurance issuers or 125 percent of the average allowed amount for the service provided by a provider in the same or similar specialty and provided in the same geographical area.

This discussion draft would also instruct the secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study and issue a public report that includes recommendations to Congress regarding the impact the bill would have on the prevalence of patient cost-sharing,

patients’ access to care and the quality of that care, the price of insurance premiums, any change in overall health care costs, the use of emergency rooms, access to new and improved drugs and technology and the adequacy of insurance networks.

I hope @ScottAdamsSays sees this