1/ Evan: Where did you read about my “entire climate change argument”?
Read my tweets, I have made ONE specific point in the last two days:
-that Libs are trying to manipulate and mislead Canadians when they call their carbon tax a “pollution pricing system”
-that...
Read my tweets, I have made ONE specific point in the last two days:
-that Libs are trying to manipulate and mislead Canadians when they call their carbon tax a “pollution pricing system”
-that...
2/
-that CO2 is food for plants, not pollution, even though we can of course debate its negative effect on climate in excessive quantities
-and that we never hear about the positive aspects such as the regreening of the planet, because it contradicts the doomsday narrative.
-that CO2 is food for plants, not pollution, even though we can of course debate its negative effect on climate in excessive quantities
-and that we never hear about the positive aspects such as the regreening of the planet, because it contradicts the doomsday narrative.
3/ So, the rest of the NASA article, which simply repeats the conventional alarmist scenario that you can read everywhere, does not in any way contradicts anything I have said.
What’s interesting is to see so many people, including journalists, freaking out because I said this.
What’s interesting is to see so many people, including journalists, freaking out because I said this.
